Hotrodders Bulletin Board Hotrodders Bulletin Board
Home · Bulletin Board · Project Journals · Tech Article Wiki · Knowledge Base · Photo Gallery · Classifieds · Company Reviews · Calendar · T-Shirts


Start a tech article on any subject...
...hundreds of hotrodders help build it into a comprehensive resource.

Fresh wiki articles that you can add to: Air suspension on a front solid axle, Basic stuff for newbies, Building a new shop, Ceramic insulation, Electric fuel pump mount, Engine and transmission mounts, Freeing a stuck engine, Gasser, How to check driveline angle, How to make a vacuum power brake bleeder, How to safely cut steel with a torch, Improving fuel economy, Narrowing a rearend, Patching a body panel, Quick-disconnect rear mount battery, Reducing vehicle weight, Stereo installation, Stripping paint, Valve spring setup, and many more...

Or, start a new article.

Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Unanswered Posts
Hotrodders Bulletin Board > General Discussion > Hotrodders' Lounge
User Name
Password
lost password?   |   register now


View Poll Results: should Marijuana be legal?
Yes 38 57.58%
No 28 42.42%
Voters: 66. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #106  
Old 09-30-2004, 01:44 PM
Beenaway2long's Avatar
Beenaway2long Beenaway2long is offline
or Jeff, or Doc, or...
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Syracuse, NY-well, just North
Age: 45
Posts: 976
Wiki Edits: 0

re: legalization of marijuana

Now THAT is what should be outlawed!! MONEY !!! LOL
Root of all evil........
Reply With Quote
  #107  
Old 09-30-2004, 02:18 PM
Rhansen's Avatar
Rhansen Rhansen is offline
Footbraker
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Davenport, Iowa
Age: 39
Posts: 432
Wiki Edits: 0

re: legalization of marijuana

That's it, all greedy, irresponsible people can get off my planet!
Reply With Quote
  #108  
Old 09-30-2004, 02:55 PM
MadRabbit's Avatar
MadRabbit MadRabbit is offline
ya just need a bigger hammer
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Charlotte Northcackalacki
Age: 38
Posts: 51
Wiki Edits: 0

Legalize it!

I am one of these idiots that has anxiety and Dr. perscribed Buspar wich is the stupid pill to me .I take one and cant keep up with a 30min sitcom .If I smoke a splif,joint,blunt or what ever it seems to set my mind allot straighter than the meds ever did.It's not for everyone and I wouldnt force it upon antbody but for me.....I smoke.And I never heard of anyone selling thier kids,furniture,wife or heaven forbid the car just to get a dime bag!unlike the poisonous and deadly crack.
I think it was a natural drug before drugs were around.and indians smoked piece pipes to make piece.
Reply With Quote
  #109  
Old 09-30-2004, 03:47 PM
tm454 tm454 is offline
Tazz
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: amherst,ohio
Age: 60
Posts: 2,059
Wiki Edits: 0

Pot? Why not??

No, of course not, they just don't get up for work or pay their bills because they want more bud than they can afford being laid off. Point in fact...its illegal....shown to be addictive to some..leading to other drug use and you go to jail if your caught using or selling it. Other than that I have no interest in it.


Tazz


Rat Rods Rule!
Reply With Quote
  #110  
Old 09-30-2004, 03:58 PM
z3pr's Avatar
z3pr z3pr is offline
A legend in my own mind
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Just west of Rapid City, SD.
Age: 42
Posts: 63
Wiki Edits: 0

re: legalization of marijuana

This thread is getting pointless. There's way too many closed minded people that can't see past the government propaganda. I'm neutral on this topic. I don't care if it's legal or not. I don't use drugs anymore. I've been on both sides of the issue and I know the truth. Some people can do dope with no ill effects, and others will loss everything over it.
Reply With Quote
  #111  
Old 09-30-2004, 04:09 PM
RCastle's Avatar
RCastle RCastle is offline
Come Home Safe Soldier
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Louisville,Kentucky
Age: 37
Posts: 854
Wiki Edits: 0

re: legalization of marijuana

I laid back and did not post on this one for awhile because of my earlier rants.Weed was around for the Indians,but it was no way near as "manufactured" then as now.I smoke those nasty old cigarettes and tried to quit so many times.They are surely the most addictive thing made to this day.I don't believe that anything short of outlawing them will make me quit.My kids have been on me to quit for as long as they have known the outcome of them.My grandfather died from them and my dad has one foot in the ground from them,I also know that I am living on borrowed time myself if I continue.I can almost convince myself that weed if in a controlled form,could be legalized by reading what some members have to say about it,but I still stand firm that if it was legalized that every other drug would soon follow and that would spell disaster.Like has been said several times,alcohol has definitely done more than weed as far as destroying families and lives,just as cigarettes have surely done more damage than weed.This is interesting food for thought guys.Take care...-Ron-
Reply With Quote
  #112  
Old 09-30-2004, 04:23 PM
MadRabbit's Avatar
MadRabbit MadRabbit is offline
ya just need a bigger hammer
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Charlotte Northcackalacki
Age: 38
Posts: 51
Wiki Edits: 0

re: legalization of marijuana

good points.If it was legel it would be abused allot and some people can be addicted to it.I smoked cigs for over 9yrs and I stopped when my 5 yr old was born and havent smoked cigs since.Maybe I have a higher tollerance to addictive things.But you never know what can suck you in........just look at cars!
Reply With Quote
  #113  
Old 09-30-2004, 08:19 PM
40fordtruck_son's Avatar
40fordtruck_son 40fordtruck_son is offline
Let the wheels of life roll on
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: preston, Idaho
Age: 19
Posts: 79
Wiki Edits: 0

re: legalization of marijuana

wow, 8 pages.

now tell me weed ain't popular. LOL

now i know alot of druggies have started with weed and moved up, but i beleive its not because of addiction. not to pot i mean, its an addiction to the high, to th efeeling. some people feel it and can't live without it.

but that dosn't mean everyone that smokes it will move onto coke, acid, 'shroom's, ECT. there is alot of casualy smokers, who do a bowl a week, or simalar that only do it to take an edge off.

why do folks come home and open up a can of beer? just one, not a case. to take the edge off. how many people drink beer and move on to harder liquor? granted, harder liquer aint gonna be as bad on your body as meth, but it can still ruin your life.

today i heard that Marjiuana is good for your eyes sight, any truth to that?
Reply With Quote
  #114  
Old 09-30-2004, 09:58 PM
53fordguy's Avatar
53fordguy 53fordguy is offline
Real Men Drive Fords
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Red Deer alberta canada
Age: 22
Posts: 273
Wiki Edits: 0

well thats interesting

I used to smoke pot and infact i was a victim of peer pressure, my dad was a dope dealer my friends all did it my friends parents were dope dealers, and i had my own share of experiances with dealing, but honestly now i haved smoked pot for about a year now and i find that after having a girlfriend, a good job and a totaly and undieng love for horsepower and hot rodding i find id rather sit and tweak a big block than smoke a joint and life is alot simpler no wasting cash on munchies and drugs no bionges that never ending nintendo, ive went from a low 60's student to a honmours graduate completing the advanced levels of mechanics, fabrication and im currently working on my autobody( go grade 13) soon i hope to have an apprenticeship in either feild. i owe alot to my girlfriends family whom helped me though the dry times buy since may last year ive been drug free ( except for the bottle now that im 18) i do have a few drinks once in a while but i go to work everyday and i enjoy every aspect of my life i now live on my own pay my own bills and have fun with my cars and everything around them. sure i havent smoked it for 10+ years but i belive its everyones choice, but nothing in this world is good for you in the end it all comes down to personal preference if you need to smoke weed, or what ever your fancy is good awesome thats wonderfull but if you sit down and brain storm and draw and totally invelope your mind in a project to get your buzz on more power to you. i may have like 2 or 3 friends now but i think its worth it to have a good life instead of one thats wrapped around whos packing the pipe next(not saying that thats how it is for everyone) heres something to quote me by:

cars, horsepower,gasoline,big block rumble, hot rodding, drag racing street racing, 454, 460, 17's , flowmaster, boyd, overhaulin, 12 bolt ford chevy cadillac, low pros, rocket stopmp, turbo 350, headers, lowered, bagged, 32', impala, dodge, hemi, crate , 900hp!, old school, vintage, white walls, motocraft......... = My anti drug! long live ford trucks built ford tough (tougher that any rock)

but most of all my girlfriend and her family

Last edited by 53fordguy : 09-30-2004 at 09:58 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #115  
Old 09-30-2004, 11:58 PM
z3pr's Avatar
z3pr z3pr is offline
A legend in my own mind
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Just west of Rapid City, SD.
Age: 42
Posts: 63
Wiki Edits: 0

re: legalization of marijuana

Reply With Quote
  #116  
Old 10-02-2004, 12:37 AM
karma fiend karma fiend is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: boston
Posts: 0
Wiki Edits: 0

re: legalization of marijuana

Quote:
Originally posted by Beenaway2long
Nice first post Karma. It speaks volumes of you. I see this headed for the dump..

Incidently, can anyone Pro-Pot give certified test results? Acknowledged sites? Or are they merely opinions? (Serious question- NOT inflammatory)


heres one to get u started.... ill have more later when i dig the sites out....

regular marijuana smoking is no worse for your health than either drinking regularly, or smoking cigarettes regularly.... cigs are worse.....

as i said ill be back with more sites that i think every anti pot person should see.....

i dont hate everybody thats anti pot... thats not my deal..... everybody is entitled to their opinion, and if yours differs from mine, even on a subject i feel so strongly about, so be it.... not a problem...

the only thing that annoys me is when people are anti pot, when the only things they know about the drug are lies that the DEAmade up as scare tactics...... and thats not even anyones fault except the DEA's.... theres so much bull**** being forced into our heads that its no wonder so many people believe it......

well if u look hard enough, u can find the truth on the whole reason pot is illegal in the first place... ill dig out a page somewhere that tells the modern history of pot (like 1860's onward) and youll be suprised at the stuff that went on..... .

im not trying to change anybodys mind here.... im just going to offer some truthful, NON-BIASED information, that many of you probably havent been fortunate enought to see..... heres one page but ill dig out more later.... peace

http://www.newscientist.com/hottopi...id=JDBDOJOGELGG

check this one out right here.... its a section out of a book called "grass"

http://www.overgrow.com/edge/showthread/t-511051.html

Quote:
Originally posted by RCastle
I laid back and did not post on this one for awhile because of my earlier rants.Weed was around for the Indians,but it was no way near as "manufactured" then as now.I smoke those nasty old cigarettes and tried to quit so many times.They are surely the most addictive thing made to this day.I don't believe that anything short of outlawing them will make me quit.My kids have been on me to quit for as long as they have known the outcome of them.My grandfather died from them and my dad has one foot in the ground from them,I also know that I am living on borrowed time myself if I continue.I can almost convince myself that weed if in a controlled form,could be legalized by reading what some members have to say about it,but I still stand firm that if it was legalized that every other drug would soon follow and that would spell disaster.Like has been said several times,alcohol has definitely done more than weed as far as destroying families and lives,just as cigarettes have surely done more damage than weed.This is interesting food for thought guys.Take care...-Ron-



i understand ur post and agree with most of it....

one thing id like to add..... when you say

Quote:
Weed was around for the Indians,but it was no way near as "manufactured" then as now.


ur correct in a way... there is alot of manufacturing.... and when its manufactured out of country, the act of exporting it over international borders in mass quantities usually involves organized crime....... example - mexico to US....

but on the other hand, its an easy plant to grow and with practice, its not hard to grow pot far superior than anything ull find on the streets, and anything that has crossed international borders.... transporting pot packed up in bags long distances will degrade the quality of the product.... the best pot ull see is "the strain ur buddys growin organicly down the street"... locally, homegrown pot is much better quality and theres no crime involved, except the the fact that cultivation is a felony....

now look at it this way.... if you decriminize cultivation (make it a fine, like a parking ticket) , there will be no need for an international market, or to move pot long distances at all, because so many people would be growing it themselves, that it wouldnt even be profitable to sell (supply and demand)....

with that said, the reason pot causes any crime at all is the fact that its illegal.... decriminalizing pot would actually be safer as far as pot related crime goes....

the only problem is, if everyones growing their own pot, then the governtments not making any cash off it..... right now they make tons of cash off it.....

they arrest you for possesion... they give you the option of going to jail or going to rehab... of course your going to go to rehab....who wants to be in jail? but the thing is, you dont need rehab if your smoking pot.... y not save beds for the dopesick people withdrawing from opiates who really need the beds?.... rehabs expensive.... thats more money out of your pocket into the govt's pockets..... then they charge you to piss in a cup every 2 weeks till your off probation.... that doesnt include court fees.....

the option of "rehab or jail" for pot related offences means that the ratio between people in rehab for pot compared to the total number of people in rehab becomes drastically inflated...... then the govt turns around and uses that bull**** stat as propaganda to keep people thinking its bad... "over 60% of all rehab patients are in for pot" .... well no **** they just didnt wanna go to jail.... they didnt really need to be there in the first place......

thats all for now... peace

i got another article here.... its an excerpt out of the july 02 playboy

it was posted by a member at another message board that im familiar with.... its worth a read tho if ur looking to make an educated decision on this topic..... if you believe all the propaganda out there today, u might as well give this info a try.... its not hard stuff to grasp....

if anybodys actually read this far down my post, i hope ive enlightened you to something new, even if i havent altered ur opinion.... as i said earlier, im not here to change anyones opinion, im here to provide u information you may have been deprived of, allowing you to make a better educated desision....

anyways, here the article

------------------

Quote:
The war on drugs has now gone on three times as long as the Vietnam war, with no end in sight and no good reason to believe it can ever be won. Richard Nixon declared the war in 1971, and its aim, as stated later by an act of Congress, was a drug-free society by 1995. If that is still the objective, plainly we have lost.
In 1980 there were 50,000 people in custody for drug-related crimes. Twenty years later, the number was 400,000. The price of locking up all those people climbed above $8.5 Billion. In 1980 some 580,000 people were arrested on drug charges.

Almost 1.6 million individuals were arrested in 2000 for alleged drug offenses, and some of them have, no doubt, joined the ever expanding prison population. Nevertheless, drugs are more available, cheaper and purer in content than ever. Inevitably, the drug warriors say they are fighting hard but they don't have the resources.

What they need is more money.

In this sense, the war on drugs has come to resemble many other big government programs and bureaucracies whose raison d'etre cannot be found in any mission statement.

Why? Because they are interest groups, and the real reason for their existence, their true mission, is to exist.

And to grow. More often than not, the best way to grow is to fail.

It works for Amtrak, the Postal Service and the Department of Education (the worse kids do in school, the more lavishly Congress funds this agency), so why not the war on drugs?

The drug warriors are, in a paradoxical way, fortunate to be fighting an unwinnable war. After a real war, troops are demobilized, weapons programs are canceled and generals are sent into retirement on half pay. But in an endless war, the money to carry on the fight more and more of it keeps rolling in until the end of time.

According to the Office of National Drug Control Policy, the federal government will spend more than $19.2 billion waging the war on drugs in 2003. That sum is $7.6 billion more than what it spent 10 years ago, and has increased by 7 percent in the past two years.

State and local governments will spend at least $20 billion more. That buys a lot of enforcement. A drug-sniffing dog with handler runs between $40,000 and $60,000 a year. A police cruiser equipped to handle dogs goes for about $25,000. A DEA agent starts somewhere between $25,000 and $40,000.

Money creates its own constituencies, and those lucky recipients tend to favor the status quo. No interest group has ever voted itself out of existence or asked Congress for less money than it received in the previous year. The people who depend on the war on drugs for their livelihood are no different. Consider, for example, the California Correctional Peace Officers Association union of prison guards that contributed more than $2 million to the campaign of the present governor of California. It has more political muscle than any lobby in the most populous state in the union. The CCPOA campaigned vigorously against a plan to send nonviolent drug offenders to treatment instead of prison.

The union has a big stake in the war on drugs and an incentive to push for its escalation. More drug busts means more convicts, and that means more jobs for prison guards and a larger union membership and war chest.

The longer the war on drugs fails, the better the union likes it.

Before drug offenders can be jailed, they must be arrested and prosecuted. That, of course, costs money.

Like prison guards and DEA agents, a lot of judges and prosecutors owe their livelihoods to the war on drugs.

Their salaries, pensions, health insurance ( which includes drug rehab, no doubt ) and all the rest are picked up by the taxpayer who, in turn, may be picked up himself if he is suspected of fooling around with the wrong kind of drugs. Because a lot of the people who are busted for drugs can't afford to pay for their own legal defense, the state ( i.e., the taxpayer ) picks up the bill for the lawyer who tries to keep the drug offender out of jail, as well as for the one who is trying to send him there.

Just about the only people involved in a routine drug trial who are not on the government payroll are the jurors who get $30 a day and a ham sandwich for lunch.

The time lost to jury duty on drug cases by otherwise productive citizens is just one of a profusion of hidden costs of the drug war.

When you begin to consider these hidden and ancillary costs, you come to realize the true magnitude of the waste.

The official, on the books cost of this war is $609 a second.

The real cost is much greater and, because the economic distortions are so large, not really determinable.

For example, the zealous pursuit of drug criminals leads inevitably to a lot of bad arrests.

Consider the case of the woman who was strip searched at O'Hare airport and later collected $129,750 in damages when she took the narcs to court.

There will be large judgments coming in favor of the people who were stopped under racial profiling policies used to make drug busts. The drug war's failures can sometimes be too expensive to calculate in dollars and cents.

Consider, for instance, the death of a seven month old girl named Charity who was a passenger, along with her missionary parents, in a plane shot down by the Peruvian Air Force as part of the U.S.financed war on drugs.

In daily life, the drug war imposes more mundane costs of inconvenience on everyone. Those long lines of cars at the Mexican and Canadian borders are a cost, in terms of time lost. Time, after all, is money, especially if you are in the transportation business.

There is also the cost of the fuel burned by all those idling engines.

Not to mention the pollution they produce.

Drug tests are required by many companies that conduct business with the government, and the drug test industry is worth some $5.9 billion.

Does that money represent an efficient use of resources?

If you're smoking a powerful substance, the answer might be yes. The fact is that in 1990, 38 federal agencies spent $11.7 million on tests for 0.5 percent positive results. Each drug user, then, cost about $77,000.

We also have to consider what is not done with the money that goes to wage war on drugs.

If you spend money on a prison instead of a school, the long-term cost comes in the form of uneducated, unskilled kids who might just turn to selling drugs to make a living.

Or using them to ease the boredom. But, hey, you have a prison, so you'll have someplace to put them when the bill comes due.

And there is the cost of wasted opportunities and undeveloped resources.

It costs about as much to imprison someone as it does to send him to a good college. But factor in the lost wages ( and taxes ) of what might otherwise have been a productive citizen.

Add in the cost of welfare for the dependents of the jailed person and the salary of the parole officer who will supervise that person after he is released.

Taking someone prisoner in the war on drugs costs a lot of money ( as much as $450,000, according to one estimate ), and it is not a onetime expense.

In the most extreme case, society loses a taxpayer ( a productive resource ) and gains at least one, and maybe several, long term dependents. This may be good for prison guards and social workers.

But it isn't much of a bargain for the remaining taxpayers who pay the bill.

Then there is the cost of crimes committed by the violent felons who should be in prison but are released early because the space required to house them is taken up by drug offenders serving mandatory minimum sentences.

A few years ago, the state of Florida released murderers, among others, according to a formula called gain time, because it needed the beds to handle drug offenders serving long sentences.

Gain time isn't always the same as good time. In some cases, in fact, it was nothing more than time served. Some of the murderers who were released returned to violent crime, including murder.

Finally, there is the cost of putting our law enforcement energies into the war on drugs instead of, say, the war on terrorism, where the return could have been much more satisfying. Between 1992 and 1998, the FBI increased its number of convictions by almost 70 percent.

After September 11, one could reasonably ask if the FBI might have been fighting the wrong war. If the priorities of the FBI had been different, perhaps events might also have been different on September 11. That is one of those imponderables, like the actual economic costs of that terrible day.

One small cost of the drug war that has been documented is the more than $3 million that went for ads during the Super Bowl. Rather than concede the possibility that a full scale war on drugs might not be the best use of the nation's will and resources, the drug warriors spent all that money to propagandize for their war and piggyback on the public's support for the war on terrorism. According to the ads, if you do dope, the money you spend on drugs goes into the pockets of terrorists.

Ah, yes. And marijuana is a gateway to hard drugs, LSD causes birth defects, and so on. The $3 million plus is chicken feed in the big scheme of things ( and the war on drugs is a big scheme, if ever there were one ). The heavy handed pitch is pretty much in line with what we have come to expect. Of course, you could point out that Osama bin Laden is a Saudi of considerable wealth.

Saudi money comes, directly or indirectly, from oil. So maybe someone should have created an ad about how if you drive a gas guzzling SUV, you are financing terrorists. Such an ad would have provoked outrage, and rightly so. But the drug warriors didn't take much criticism for their Super Bowl spots.

Probably because we have all grown weary. The drug war has been going on so long that we expect it, like farm subsidies, to go on forever.

The difference, of course, is that when you pay farmers not to grow crops, you are just wasting money.

When you pay for a war on drugs, you waste lives. If we are going to pay so extravagantly for such meager results ( the drugs keep coming in and people keep using them ), then maybe it is time to pay off the drug warriors.

Give them the money, but only if they do nothing.

The only other solution, after such a long exercise in futility, is to recognize that what we really need to do is declare war on the war on drugs.

this was written by geoffrey norman, published in july 02" in playboy magazine

Last edited by karma fiend : 10-02-2004 at 12:37 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #117  
Old 10-02-2004, 06:16 PM
54belairkid's Avatar
54belairkid 54belairkid is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: boston
Age: 20
Posts: 3
Wiki Edits: 0

re: legalization of marijuana

leagilize it
fi these kids want to smoke pot let them do it who cares any ways its there body let them do what ever the * they want wit it, and there will be less kids in jail so we can make room for the real nut jobs, the cops are spendin more time arrestin kids for drugs when they could be out preventing gang violence, all there dooin is havin a little fun. besides drinkin is way more harm ful to the user and inocent pedestrians.look at the smilie icons would you rather have this guy driving or this guy i rest my case

Last edited by Jon : 10-02-2004 at 08:53 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #118  
Old 10-02-2004, 09:16 PM
msc66's Avatar
msc66 msc66 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Atlanta GA
Age: 49
Posts: 84
Wiki Edits: 0

re: legalization of marijuana

The other day a few people I work with were out after work when one said "have you ever noticed that even though pot is illegal everybody has it." That is such a true statement. I'm 45 yrs old and the vast majority of people I know or have ever met smoke pot and can readily buy it. In my life I've met people from all walks of life, steal workers to doctors, yuppies to rednecks and the one thing that most of them had/have in common is weed.

Most of the people I know now smoke pot and have for most of their lives. These are successful people with good jobs, nice homes ect. Yeh, I've had friends who have become junkies, coke heads or alcoholics but they had other issues that they were trying to hide from. Most people I know that smoke pot have never done harder drugs and if they have it had nothing to do with pot. I drank and did coke and extasy long before I ever smoked pot. I don't do any of it now because that part of my life has past. I had a lot of fun but now I just don't feel the need to do it anymore. (If it were legal I might still smoke now and then though)

So I guess what I'm getting at is that yes, pot should be legal and regulated like alcohol. It is so readily available as it is, so why waste tax dollars and jail space busting people for something that in my experience is less harmful than alcohol? Of course we're talking about pot here not the harder drugs.

MIke C.
Reply With Quote
  #119  
Old 10-03-2004, 08:05 PM
68ImpalaSS's Avatar
68ImpalaSS 68ImpalaSS is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Omaha, NE
Age: 34
Posts: 3
Wiki Edits: 0

re: legalization of marijuana

well I do not smoke any more but I have no problem with it. As far as I see it if it was legal it would just be more tax money for the country to try to get out of debt with.

There are far more deaths due to alchohol than weed and it is legal.
Reply With Quote
  #120  
Old 10-04-2004, 06:50 AM
heloflyer007's Avatar
heloflyer007 heloflyer007 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Charlotte Nc
Age: 28
Posts: 1
Wiki Edits: 0

re: legalization of marijuana

Reply With Quote
Closed Thread
Back to top


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump




Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.3.2 © 2005, Crawlability, Inc.
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:07 PM.
Copyright Hotrodders.com 1999 - 2008. All Rights Reserved.