|
Long Awaited 400 SBC Dyno Results
I've finally got the results for the 400 SBC that I have been asking all kinds of questions about lately, from differences in valvespring pressure, to crankshaft and block reliability, manifold porting etc. I thought I would post the dyno numbers to show what motor I produced with some of the help and insight I received from people on this website. I have also received PMs from people interested in the output from this particular build. I got this done yesterday, at the expense of $640 (CDN), but the guy I built it for sure had a big grin on his face when he seen the numbers. Although it was a tad shy of my expectations, he was thrilled with the output and promised to do some rubber donuts in front of my shop in his truck when the snow is gone.
So here it is... I cannot get my scanner working for the actual dyno sheets, so I typed it out instead in summary form, since there is a TON of information from the dyno (some of which I don't really know), and it would make for a long night of typing to report it all...
------------------------------------------
Lee Brothers Automotive - performance specialties
- Dynamometer test session results for 400 Small block Chevy
-Ambient air temperature: 18.9*C
-Ambient air pressure: 101.9 kPa
-Ambient humidity reading: 42%
-Fuel Type: Gasoline
-Fuel Octane rating: (unknown)
-Fuel delivery method: Carburetion
Gross power output readings:
RPM...............PWR(HP)...............TRQ(FT-LBS).............MAN PRS(PSI)
2000................165........................433 ...........................14.56
2250................190........................443 ...........................14.55
2500................216........................454 ...........................14.54
2750................242........................462 ...........................14.52
3000................270........................472 ...........................14.50
3250................300........................485 ...........................14.47
3500................328........................492 ...........................14.45
3750................356........................498 ...........................14.41
4000................381........................501 ...........................14.38
4250................406........................502 ...........................14.34
4500................427........................499 ...........................14.31
4750................446........................493 ...........................14.26
5000................453........................476 ...........................14.21
5250................463........................463 ...........................14.15
5500................457........................437 ...........................14.11
5750................468........................427 ...........................14.10
6000................435........................381 ...........................14.07
There was a bunch of other stuff it read, like approximate CFM airflow usage, efficiency of overlap, efficiency of head flow, intake manifold restriction estimates, exhaust manifold restriction estimates, etc. but this is all sensitive to the engine parameters that were entered for the dyno test, and as such they are computer generated numbers and should be taken as credibly as Dyno 2000 numbers.
Here is the engine build for this test:
SBC 406
10.5:1 compression
Speed Pro forged pistons with -10cc dish (he wanted pump gas)
Scat forged 5.7 rods
Scat cast 9000 series crank
Clevite 77 bearings
Mildly ported Edelbrock Performer RPM heads 252cfm intake, 191 cfm exhaust, 64cc chambers
Comp Cams solid XS268 cam, 230/236 @ .050, .488/.501 lift, 110 LSA
Crane Cams Pro Street Roller Rocker Arms
Edelbrock RPM Air Gap intake
750 Mighty Demon Carburetor
1-3/4" Hooker full length headers
Mallory Performance HEI Ignition with Accel 8mm plug wires, 36* total timing
Stock Oil pump with Moroso oil pan with baffle
8" harmonic dampener
I would have adjusted the carb some more, but the price of the operation severely limited my time. All in all it produced a pretty strong street motor, although short of the 500HP I was expecting, guess it shows that 500 HP is a lot harder to attain than one might think. It's possible the readings may have been slightly higher had I tested this motor at sea level in better air, as I currently reside at about 2800 ft elevation. I noticed the torque and HP peaked at relatively low RPM, calling into question the use of a bigger cam. However I was to use the stock stall for this build (truck), so I would have been giving up a lot of low end going much bigger.
I can surely use this as a basis for another 400 SBC project I have in the works, perhaps upgrading to a solid roller cam, a victor jr intake, and a bigger cam with a higher stall to get to the 500HP mark.
|