Mustang guys Help! - Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board
Hotrodders.com -- Hot Rod Forum



Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Unanswered Posts Auto Escrow Insurance Auto Loans
Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board > Tech Help> Engine
User Name
Password
lost password?   |   register now

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-20-2003, 06:29 PM
Tazz
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: amherst,ohio
Age: 66
Posts: 2,049
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mustang guys Help!

A buddy put a 2000 cobra 5.0 in his 86 stang. The 86 was 5.0 but the problem arises when the fuel rail for the Cobra and the 86 5.0 don't interchange. The 86 fuel rail has a fuel return line and the cobra 5.0 fuel rail dosn't and the Cobra runs RICH as HELL on the 86 fuel rail. What is the fix? Don't know if they have the same fuel pressure needs and don't know about adding a 2000 fuel rail and stuff in the 86? If this isn't confusing you maybe you can help, I couldn't help him. Thanks guys.




Todd




Rat Rods Rule!

    Advertisement
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-20-2003, 06:43 PM
dmorris1200's Avatar
doesn't play well with others
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Maine
Age: 49
Posts: 1,834
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Well unfortunately I have no manuals to check but I thought that after 1996 the Mustangs all had 4.6 modular engines in them. I didn't think Ford used a returnless fuel system in the newer Mustangs so there should be a return fitting. If it is a returnless system rail it will not work with the old pump and pressure rail. I would think you would need to modify the rail with a pressure regulator and a return line. The returnless systems are regulated by the PCM which drives the pump.


__________________
BUILT FORD TOUGH
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-21-2003, 05:10 AM
mstngjoe's Avatar
Member
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Oregon
Age: 63
Posts: 593
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
DMorris is correct........no 5.0 in year 2000. The Cobra had a 4.6 in it (the Corbra "R" had a 351W) and I would assume a Cobra specific fuel setup. I could be wrong on that though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-21-2003, 06:59 AM
woodz428's Avatar
Troll Hunter
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Philo,Il
Posts: 2,702
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Arrow

I believe by 2000 that the Cobra "R" was using the 5.4 mod motor. So no Windsor there either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-21-2003, 07:32 AM
klassik100's Avatar
Member
 

Last journal entry: almost ready to go in
Last photo:
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Melbourne Australia
Age: 48
Posts: 85
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Ask around at some of the mustang forums like www.imboc.com or www.mach1registry.com some of these guys do some weird stuff retro fitting late model motors into earlier cars.

Good luck

Craig
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-21-2003, 07:49 AM
former member of HR.com
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 175
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
You could do an HO "conversion" and go with a 4bbl, if all else fails and things get too expensive. Now this is based on the assumption that you are using a 5.0.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 10-21-2003, 07:54 AM
mstngjoe's Avatar
Member
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Oregon
Age: 63
Posts: 593
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally posted by woodz428
I believe by 2000 that the Cobra "R" was using the 5.4 mod motor. So no Windsor there either.
I stand corrected.

It was the '95 R with the 351W. The 2000 did indeed have the 5.4 with 32 valves.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 10-21-2003, 01:40 PM
Grumpy
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: D.C.
Posts: 1,447
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
All cobras 96(maybe 94-95) and newer use the 4.6 281 V-8. There is no ford 5.0 anymore. Even the concept cobra uses the 4.6 with a blower on it. My friend has a 98 Cobra with a 144 and the 4.6 in it and the figures look almost the same on a dyno to the new cobras.

I dont believe there is a 5.4 in the 2000 cobras, at least not from the factory. But I'm not a ford guy, I just know my friend loves his cobra and thats how I found out the info.

Try using smaller injectors if your running so rich.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 10-22-2003, 05:40 PM
Tazz
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: amherst,ohio
Age: 66
Posts: 2,049
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
it is a 2000 Cobra

I called it a 5. 0 not knowing any better. I told him to CK this site for himself, maybe he will post.



Todd



Rat Rods Rule!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 10-22-2003, 08:09 PM
WV hillbilly
 

Last journal entry: PTL 220CC
Last photo:
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: WV
Age: 39
Posts: 784
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
there wasnt a 5.4 in a cobra, its too tall, it would have to have a 3" cowl from factory N/a and a 4" cowl wouldnt clear the supercharged version, there was however a 5.4 lightning and it was supercharged...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 10-22-2003, 08:39 PM
mstngjoe's Avatar
Member
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Oregon
Age: 63
Posts: 593
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally posted by 2wld4u
there wasnt a 5.4 in a cobra, its too tall, it would have to have a 3" cowl from factory N/a and a 4" cowl wouldnt clear the supercharged version, there was however a 5.4 lightning and it was supercharged...
The 1995 Cobra "R" along with the 2000 Cobra "R" had larger displacement engines than the standard Cobra.

The 351W (5.8) in '95 and the 5.4 (330 cid) in '00.

Check out the info here:

http://www.svtregistry.com/cobra-r/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 10-22-2003, 08:54 PM
WV hillbilly
 

Last journal entry: PTL 220CC
Last photo:
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: WV
Age: 39
Posts: 784
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
I stand corrected, I have delt with the 5.4's and they seem to be a little to tall for a mustang, but thats what the site said, Hmm, Id like to try that swap...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 10-22-2003, 09:16 PM
Grumpy
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: D.C.
Posts: 1,447
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Yeah but those cobra "R" s are cars that we will probably not see. And why is the 2000 Cobra R only putting out high 300's on HP and torque? My friends 98 cobra with a 144 on a 4.6 at 5-8psi puts out 400HP/380ft lbs. ?? With those numbers I would think the new cobra is supercharged, but they are still kinda low.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 10-23-2003, 06:21 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: CA
Age: 29
Posts: 71
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mustangs from 1979 - 1995 Used a 5.0 L block, Which was Basically a 302 Windsor Block that was available back in 1968 Mustangs.

(In 1979 They added 5.0 To make it look more appealing.)
So truthfully 1968 - 1995 Marks the Exsistance of the 5.0 (302 W) Block in publically available Mustangs.

Fuel Injection started in 1985 for The Ford Mustang. The 5.0 Does have a Fuel line that goes straight into the engine (No return lines) In 1996 Ford Switched to a Smaller 4.6 L (281 CID) Block... The 2000 COBRA "R" MODEL (Notice the R at the end) used a 333 CID 5.4 L Cast Iron Windsor Block. (This is the same block used in the Current Ford SVT F150)

And to the guy that said a 199x - 200x Mustang can't handle a 5.4, They're wrong. Theres an issure of HOTROD magazine as well as the 1994 10L Boss Produced by SVT Team *only 10 in the world exsist*, (In which theres a 429 CID Engine) in each Mustang.. Check out
http://www.svt.ford.com/flash/index.html
go to concept cars and check out the 10L boss... They did that without cutting and it fits right in, nothing needed to be moved around...

To the guy that started this trend, from my understanding your going to have to switch fuel pumps and fuel rails, the 4.6 Block that came from the 2000 COBRA (Notice its just cobra and not COBRA R) needs a return fuel line, it wasent made to burn the Excessive fuel that the 5.0 Needed. The Injectors would also have to be switched (Use the Injectors from the 4.6 with the 4.6, Because the 5.0 Used Higher Lb/Hr. Injectors then that of the 4.6)

I personally think it would be easier to swap a fuel tank from a 4.6 onto your 80's Mustang and swap the blocks, and that should settle all the Major problems you would experience... (You will also need to get your hands on a 4.6 ECU..)

If theres anything else Just reply here and hopefully I can keep up on this thread.

Mustangs are my Favorite car, Love em to death, I currently co-own a 1997 and am looking to buy a 94 - 95 GT for myself (Last years of the 5.0) Good luck and I hope this Helped others as well.
__________________________________________________
When I re-read your post I think you got the Engines mixed up man..

The 4.6 281 CID (used in the 2000 Cobra) uses a Fuel Return Line

The 5.0 302 CID (Used in your Friends 86 Mustang GT/LX, Etc.) Uses a Straight Line that fed into the engine and had NO FUEL RETURN line

Then theres a 2000 Cobra "R" which uses a 5.4 333 CID Engine, From what I recollect this as well diden't use a Fuel Return line.

I doubt you got your hands on a 2000 Cobra "R" because theres only 300 of those in the world and the selling price on one was marked at $54,000+ The Engine could have been ordered After market but You said your friend got The block out of a 2000 Cobra...

So that leads me to beleave you have your hands on a 2000 Cobra 4.6L (281) Block, and your friends origional 5.0 (302 W) blocks.

Remember as I said earlier, the 4.6 HAS and NEEDS the fuel return line to keep it from running RICH.

The 5.0 uses a NON Return line system (The Fuel pumps into the engine and stays there).

Thats why when you put the 86 5.0 Fuel rail on the 2000 4.6 Block The Engine ran RICH as hell, because it diden't have the Return fuel line the 4.6 Block NEEDS, to bleed off the un-needed fuel it was getting.

You might also want to check your FPR (Fuel pressure regulator) and make sure its not Set at a High pressure, or else your defeating yourself there as well....

Last edited by Smoked Rubber; 10-23-2003 at 06:21 AM.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 10-23-2003, 10:09 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: muskegon,Mich.
Posts: 3
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
hummm?????? the first fuel injected mustang came out in 1986,i own one,and it dose have return fuel lines,need to know if your friend is usen the 86 ecu,if so ,this is his problem you need to use the ecu for correct for that spasiffic engine..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Recent Engine posts with photos

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name (usually not your first and last name), your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright Hotrodders.com 1999 - 2012. All Rights Reserved.