![]() |
|
|
|
||||||
|
Apples to apricots.
Quote:
|
|
||||||
|
I tend to agree, I think if you look at a same year comparison the 302 will actually almost always make more power. There's a reason the 6 was a base engine and the v8 was an option. It's a good mill don't get me wrong but let's not start start the myth factory here...
|
|
||||
|
and nither of our trucks are any were ner stock the 302 is alot newer and has racing cams and **** and the 300 just a new tranny and carborator and its a long wheel base
|
|
||||||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
the 300 in line 6s has less strian on the motor cause the pistons aind going at a angle so there for it has more power cuase of less strain on the motor now if you have a low geared tranny hocked to the in line 6 the 302 will out run it but if you up grade the tranny no it will not
|
|
||||||
|
Quote:
K |
|
||||||
|
Quote:
Even ignoring your faulty assumptions, what you are saying cannot be taken seriously- there are too many variables when you just say "300 inline 6" and "302 Ford". And you cannot judge all 302's and all 300 I6's by what Momma's 302 does compared to your 300. Besides, she told me that she was sandbagging just to let you win for a change.
|
|
||||||
|
Quote:
The head on the 300 is pretty restrictive and even hogged out as much as you dare port isn't capable of supporting much over 300 hp. There were some furnace brazed 351C heads made for them that would allow for a pretty radical engine build, rare and expensive. |
|
|
| Recent Hotrodding Basics posts with photos |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|