![]() |
|
|
|
||||||
|
I guess there bigger to feed a bigger engine, right outa the box.
|
|
|||||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||||
|
I agree. You cant compare apples to oranges.
|
|
|||||
|
I know the 326 is a stepchild.
|
|
|||||
|
Even if you port the bezesus out of a Pontiac D port, the Vortec port is still higher.
Last edited by V8&4spd; 01-31-2011 at 08:54 PM. |
|
|||||
|
Quote:
This is not comparing apples to oranges, this is comparing fish to birds. Totally different. |
|
|||||
|
I"m not the one who brought up the chambers. I just ran with it. How about GM to GM. Now instead of everyone doing the two step trying to avoid posting the flow numbers. Lets see the real numbers to see how they compare.
|
|
|||||
|
Quote:
They (Edelbrock D's)flow better than a stock Chevy Vortec head, but not by a lot. If you are wanting to know what stock Pontiac D-ports flow you can take a look at Stan Weiss' cylinder head flow database, shows the 7K3 Pontiac head at 215 intake/170 exhaust cfm @ ".600 lift and 28" drop, and most stock Pontiac D-ports regardless of the casting numbers are within a few cfm of this. His head database has a lot of entries, from a lot of different sources, for many different heads and engine families |
|
||||||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||||
|
Quote:
what can i say??? when i have a chevy i scrap em
|
|
|
| Recent Engine posts with photos |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New Pontiac edelbrock aluminum Dport heads | 1badLemans | Engine | 5 | 01-30-2011 09:26 PM |
| 57 pontiac 287 edelbrock 4 brl manifold | krazeyone | Engine | 10 | 01-29-2011 12:10 AM |
| Edelbrock Heads | BBCMudbogger | Engine | 10 | 01-03-2006 04:55 PM |
| Edelbrock E-Tec Heads vs- Edelbrock Rpm`s. | KeithB123 | Engine | 3 | 10-26-2004 06:39 PM |
| edelbrock e-tec heads | nastynova | Engine | 2 | 03-13-2003 06:42 PM |