New Engine Combo - Your Opinions - Page 2 - Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board
Hotrodders.com -- Hot Rod Forum



Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Unanswered Posts Auto Escrow Insurance Auto Loans
Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board > Tech Help> Engine
User Name
Password
lost password?   |   register now

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 01-13-2008, 03:39 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dickson, TN
Posts: 36
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
For those interesed, here are a few pics of the heads.






    Advertisement
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 03-22-2008, 08:41 PM
Member
 

Last journal entry: dash mods
Last photo:
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Picton,Ont,Canada
Age: 64
Posts: 189
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
New Engine Combo - Your Opinions

..........

Last edited by TheCiscoKid; 03-26-2008 at 12:13 AM.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 03-23-2008, 08:46 AM
Stroke Meister
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: MI, USA
Posts: 703
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Probably up and running, but do you have a pic of the guide boss more visible than in the above pic?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 07-14-2008, 07:57 PM
J.D J.D is offline
Registered User
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Faith, North Carolina
Posts: 30
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoubleVision
200cc heads are too big, it'll be rather soggy in the lower RPM ranges. 180 would have been far better. the smaller 600cfm carb will make up for some of it, but not much. Since you dont know for sure your rear gear I'd find out, as it will be a big influence on how it performs. I always use GM head gaskets that are .028 in thickness, the 64cc chambers will give you a ratio somewhere in the 9:1 area even with the thin head gaskets depending on how far down in the bore the pistons are. rest of the combo looks good, but I think you have a bit too much head for it.
If he shaved the heads and uped the compression would that not help for the large runners?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Recent Engine posts with photos

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name (usually not your first and last name), your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SBC 350 superiority rebuttle...was:POWERED BY CHEVY, WRITTEN ON A FORD, (from 'Engine Oldsmolac911 Hotrodders' Lounge 50 01-12-2011 11:00 PM
Valve Lash adjustment hiball Engine 36 05-11-2009 11:12 AM
Anything wrong with this engine combo?? Scott2112 Engine 6 03-05-2007 10:53 PM
Opinions requested from Engine Builders jleeheat Engine 24 02-06-2007 09:31 PM
engine tranny combo buffulohunter Engine 4 01-22-2007 08:05 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright Hotrodders.com 1999 - 2012. All Rights Reserved.