New Engine Combo - Your Opinions - Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board
Hotrodders.com -- Hot Rod Forum



Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Unanswered Posts Auto Escrow Insurance Auto Loans
Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board > Tech Help> Engine
User Name
Password
lost password?   |   register now

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2008, 12:28 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dickson, TN
Posts: 36
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
New Engine Combo - Your Opinions

Hello All,

I'm currently in the process of upgrading a few components of my mostly stock 350 in my Chevelle. I'm curious to see what you all think of my combination.

It has a virtually stock bottom end. The engine was rebuilt well over 10 years ago, but has been run very little. This is a mid 70's smog engine with dished pistons.

I'm replacing the unknown aftermarket cam with a Voodoo 60102. I've purchased a set of Summit brand aluminum heads with 200cc intake runners and 64cc combustion chambers along with 2.02/1.60 valves. I also have a set of Comp Cams Magnum roller-tipped rocker arms (1:5 ratio).

The engine will be topped off with a Weiand Stealth aluminum intake and a 600 cfm Holley carb with vacuum secondaries. I also have an aftermarket HEI distributor to install.

This all will be backed by a TH350 trans. with some stall to it and a shift kit. I still have the factory open differential (I'm guestimating it at approx. 3.73 ratio, originally a L6/glide car).

I realize that my engine's downfall (in my opinion) is the dished pistons. It's just not economically feasible at this time to purchase flat tops. I have yet to get new head gaskets. I'm still studying to figure out what thickness would be best for my application... Any suggestions?


So.... Would any of you be so gratious as to give me your opinions on this setup? Criticize/compliment at will. I know this is far from the ideal engine combo, but it's what I've got to work with. My funds may allow a few changes here and there, but not much. What kind of power would you expect to get out of this combo?

Any and all info is appreciated.

Thanks in advance,
300Deluxe

    Advertisement
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2008, 01:18 AM
DoubleVision's Avatar
Not Considered a Senior Member
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Heart Of Dixie
Age: 41
Posts: 10,664
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 15
Thanked 60 Times in 57 Posts
200cc heads are too big, it'll be rather soggy in the lower RPM ranges. 180 would have been far better. the smaller 600cfm carb will make up for some of it, but not much. Since you dont know for sure your rear gear I'd find out, as it will be a big influence on how it performs. I always use GM head gaskets that are .028 in thickness, the 64cc chambers will give you a ratio somewhere in the 9:1 area even with the thin head gaskets depending on how far down in the bore the pistons are. rest of the combo looks good, but I think you have a bit too much head for it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2008, 05:50 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dickson, TN
Posts: 36
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks for the reply DoubleVision.

I've also been under the impression that the heads are a bit much for the rest of the components. My line of thought was that they would give me room to grow when I decide to go more radical with this or any other engine. Plus when comparing prices at the time I purchased the heads, they weren't much more than an iron counterpart.

What would be a desireable rear gear ratio? 3.73? I plan on eventually replacing the stock differential with a 12 bolt.

I *think* that my pistons are .025" in the hole. Can anyone confirm this of a 70's era 350 with dished pistons? Does anyone know of a set of piston's being further in the hole from the factory?

Also, with a .028" thick head gasket, would I need to be concerned about piston to valve clearance issues?

Thanks,
300Deluxe
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2008, 06:49 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dickson, TN
Posts: 36
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
F-Bird,

I've been under the impression that the springs that came with the heads are too aggressive for my cam (see my other thread on valvesprings). I don't know the specs right off hand, but I do remember the tag on the springs mention a roller cam (I'm running hydraulic).

Sounds like you're familiar with these heads. Will the springs be suitable for my cam?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2008, 07:47 AM
DoubleVision's Avatar
Not Considered a Senior Member
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Heart Of Dixie
Age: 41
Posts: 10,664
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 15
Thanked 60 Times in 57 Posts
I wouldnt even consider roller cam springs on a flat tappet cam. But then again, my belief is always run the springs that are matched to the cam.
The cam companys say do not use flat tappet springs on a roller cam, machinists will tell you the same, same thing applies to vice versa. With todays crappy oils that are killing flat tappet cams and a roller springs pressure, it wouldnt take long to eat the lobe off.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2008, 11:46 AM
Member
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Age: 51
Posts: 4,023
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 24 Times in 24 Posts
Just running the outer springs will cause harmonic issues. The inner and out springs have different natural frequencies so they dampen each other. Therefore, I would recommend you buy the correct single spring with dampener for your new cam. check with Lunati.

I think a 2000rpm stall should do it. I would think you could even run the stock converter. Again, check with Lunati.

Why did you select a cam with so much more exhaust duration? Do your new heads have poor flowing exhaust ports?

Good luck keeping that cam from going flat. Those voodoo (lunati) and xtreme (compcams) cams have very aggressive lobes tend to go flat quickly. Sure, they make more power but not worth the damage that a flat lobe can cause.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2008, 11:52 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dickson, TN
Posts: 36
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The cam was suggested to me form another member on another forum. Being as the bottom end of the engine is basically stock with dished pistons, I didn't want to get too radical of a cam. I'm not knowledgable enough with valvetrain geometry to specify a particular duration for the intake/exhaust; hence I didn't get a custom grind. I was under the assumption that this would be a decent cam for a mild build. Was I wrong? I'm beginning to doubt the cam selection now.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2008, 12:12 PM
Member
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Age: 51
Posts: 4,023
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 24 Times in 24 Posts
Yes, it will make a good mild cam. However, it has very aggressive lift rates which often can cause lobes to go flat.

When selecting the cam, the intake/exhaust flow ratio should be considered. A stock GM cylinder head typically has a poor I/E ratio (65 to 75%) so it does well with a cam with more exhaust duration, like the one you have. However, after market heads tend to have good I/E ratios (>80%) so a cam with the same intake and exhaust duration should be used.

Do a search on this site for "flat lobes" or "bad cam" or the like and see how many are voodoo or xtreme cam grinds.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2008, 05:30 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dickson, TN
Posts: 36
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Guys I certainly appreciate your input.

I've read horror stories on various forums of cams failing prematurely. This is why I'm trying to go about this build as meticulous as I can. I've read about cam break-in procedures at-length and hope to follow the guidelines provided here and elsewhere.

There seems to be differing opinions on the valvespring issue here. Here are the specs of the springs provided with the heads:

1.47 Dia

Intalled Height (Intake): 1.88 (Exhaust): 1.88

Seat Pressure: 130

Open Pressure: 320

There are various check boxes with the different types of cams on the spring card with "Hyd Roller" checked.

Lunati's recommended valvespring specs:

1.266 Dia - single spring

Installed Height: 1.75

Installed Pressure: 108

Open Height: 1.25

Open Pressure: 339

Coil bind height: 1.060

Spring rate: 462 lbs/in

I realize we need to compare apples to apples here, but the above info is what I found on both springs.

Judging by the numbers, the provided springs are obviously heavier. So F-bird, do you think that these will be OK for my cam? My line of thinking is the fear of having too much pressure on the lobes. You suggested removing the inner springs. What are the specs of just the outers? Are they similar to Lunati's recommended specs?

454C10, you recomment NOT removing the inner spring, right? What would your alternative be?

I apologize for the redundancy. I just want to be confident before I start assembling anything.

You all have already been a big help.

Thanks,
300Deluxe
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2008, 11:31 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dickson, TN
Posts: 36
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
F-Bird,

I got the spring specs from both Jegs and Summit's product description on their websites. I want to say that I looked them up at one time on Holley's website as well. I'm guessing that they can't be found there anymore.

It's a relief knowing I won't have to purchase new valvesprings. I just wanted to be certain.

What about pushrods? I plan on purchasing a length gauge. I was told that the stock pushrods wouldn't work. I've read that with the proper length, that the tip of the rocker arm should be centered over the pushrod. I *think* this came from article on Comp's website. I may have to dig up the link. Is this something you eyeball to see that it "looks" centered? Or is there a more precise way of measuring?

Also, I'll pose this question again: With such a thin head gasket, do I need to be concerned with valve-to-piston clearance?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 01-11-2008, 06:27 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dickson, TN
Posts: 36
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Bump. I'm getting lost in the shuffle, lol.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 01-12-2008, 08:14 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dickson, TN
Posts: 36
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The specs for the 1.47" springs are on a card attached to a spring on each head.

F-Bird, I appreciate your help.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 01-12-2008, 08:34 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dickson, TN
Posts: 36
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
One more thing: With this combo, is there a ballpark horsepower/torque figure? Just curious.

Thanks.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 01-12-2008, 05:08 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dickson, TN
Posts: 36
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
www.lunatipower.com

Found out about the site a day or two ago. Apparantly it's not 100% functional, but there is a pdf catalog.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 01-12-2008, 07:01 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: AZ
Posts: 15
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Tanks

First I would Like to thank you 300Deluxe for posting this thread. Next I would Like to thank Double Vision, F-Bird'88 and 454C10. I am very very new at this and you guys have answered a lot of questions that I have been asking my self. The four of you have also given me so much to look and thank about. If not for people like you guys my '73 Malibu would be half of what I would like to thank it is going to be. Again THANK YOU so much all of you. RAH!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Recent Engine posts with photos

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name (usually not your first and last name), your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SBC 350 superiority rebuttle...was:POWERED BY CHEVY, WRITTEN ON A FORD, (from 'Engine Oldsmolac911 Hotrodders' Lounge 50 01-12-2011 10:00 PM
Valve Lash adjustment hiball Engine 36 05-11-2009 10:12 AM
Anything wrong with this engine combo?? Scott2112 Engine 6 03-05-2007 09:53 PM
Opinions requested from Engine Builders jleeheat Engine 24 02-06-2007 08:31 PM
engine tranny combo buffulohunter Engine 4 01-22-2007 07:05 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright Hotrodders.com 1999 - 2012. All Rights Reserved.