New GM ZZ383 Stroker Oil Consumption - Page 3 - Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board
Hotrodders.com -- Hot Rod Forum



Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Unanswered Posts Auto Escrow Insurance Auto Loans
Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board > Tech Help> Engine
User Name
Password
lost password?   |   register now

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2013, 07:16 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 19
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
ZZ383 Bad new continues I guess...

Sorry to hear you are having issues with your ZZ383 similar to mine. If I was a betting man I would say that they forgot to seal the intake studs, and the oil is getting sucked into the intake chambers. If you read all my post you will see what I have learned. The ZZ383 Stroked pulls a ton of vacuum. And given that you are seeing smoke on decel, that is when the motor is drawing the most. Keep me posted. One would think that if we could get enough folks together who purchased problematic ZZ383's in 2012 that GM owes us something.....

    Advertisement
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2013, 09:57 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 7
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Hello. Years ago i bought 300hp crate motor and it had a oil leak. The warr. said any chevy dealer across the nation could work on it. Do you have a chevy dealer near you to take it to. That will eliminate the middle man (your installer). I had to take mine back 4 times at no cost to me. Gm is jerking you around so maybe you will get better help from a dealer with a good service dept. and let them work with gm's BS.

Good luck

Don
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 01-09-2013, 07:00 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 19
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Talking Directly with GM

I am now communicating directly with GM So ??? The installer has been very helpful. And GM warranty folks have been OK. I am just tired of having to monitor everything I do. I think the correct move on their part if customer service was of concern would have been to send me another motor that was inspected prior to shipment.


My time is not their concern. The waiting continues until spring..........
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 04-10-2013, 07:46 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Ga.
Posts: 6
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
zz383 oil consumption

I have my truck with the zz383 in it at the dealership now and they are going to put valve seals on it today.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2013, 08:22 AM
Registered User
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Woodstock
Posts: 1,370
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 47
Thanked 216 Times in 176 Posts
WOW, GM sure has had a lot of issues with the 383 engines. When they 1st came out years ago, GM had to redesign the pistons slightly oversize pistons(4.005) to help to quiet them down.

These 383's have been out for over 11 years now(since 2002), you'd think GM would have them down pat by now.

GMPP doesnt seem to be having the same issues with the HT383 (340hp) or the HT383-E (direct replacement for 96-99 GMT400 Vortec 350 trucks/SUV's).
The Fastburn headed ZZ383(425hp) and the HT383 and HT383-E all share the exact same longblocks(crank/rods/block/pistons) only differnce is the cam and heads. ZZ383 uses the 220║/230║ duration @0.050" lift and lift of 509"/.528" lift(p/n 12370846) and the HT383/HT383-E runs the same cam as the Ramjet 350 crate and teh GM marine engines with 196║/206║ duration@0.050" lift and lift of 0.431"/0.451" witha 109║LSA(p/n-14097395).

The reason the engine pull so much vacuum isnt necessarily because of its stroke, its because of the discplacement itself.
The ZZ383/HY383/HT38/383-E) all use a 4.00 bore and 3.80 stroke which equals 383cid. You could have the exact same displacement engine built differently like 5.52" bore and 2" stroke for 382.9 cid. Both are 383 engines.

1 thing for sure, I would not be babying this engine around. The redline is 6000rpm, and I for sure would have had this engine there several times by now. The rods in the GM 383 engines are certified to 500hp.

The limited production ZZ430.430hp 350 crate, ZZ385-350cid crate, and the ZZ383-425hp/383 all use the same 210cc Fastburn heads. I wonder if GMPP has had issues with those engines as well?

I had a buddy install a ZZ383 in his 57 Chev, I'll have to check with him to see how its working.

good luck with your GMPP engines. I would love to have a ZZ383 engine, but for around the same money, a 525hp GEN 4 crate can be had. Or go grab a junkyard 6.2(376), drop in a cam and enjoy 500+hp.

peace
Hog
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2013, 09:02 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 9
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
i returned my zz383 and got my money back. what a horrible piece of workmanship.

gm basically told me to pound sand and would not offer any help/warranty, the worst customer service i have ever experienced. i hope many people read this post and decide not to go with a GMPP engine. i was given the run around for 6 months.

never buying a GMPP ever again. horrible quality.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2013, 09:45 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 9
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
i dont mean to be bitter about my previous post. but i was absolutely shocked and still AM shocked at how GM treats a customer who pays $5000 for an engine. No wonder why other companies are taking over the American market. wake up gm. the customer is always right!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2013, 10:39 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 19
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Getting a bad felling

I am just bringing my car out of winter hibernation. I have been instructed by GM to put more miles on the motor (4000) before they will reevaluate my oil issue. I have another 1200 to go. Does not look good so far.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 04-12-2013, 09:48 AM
Registered User
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Woodstock
Posts: 1,370
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 47
Thanked 216 Times in 176 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by airsmith View Post
I am just bringing my car out of winter hibernation. I have been instructed by GM to put more miles on the motor (4000) before they will reevaluate my oil issue. I have another 1200 to go. Does not look good so far.
Please let up know how it turns out.

Good luck!

peace
Hog
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 04-17-2013, 03:24 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Ga.
Posts: 6
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The dealship replaced my valve seals and the engine still smokes. They pulled the right head and it was loaded with oil. GM instructs the dealer to now take out the rocker studs and seal them, replace the valve seals with umbrella type seals, and replace the Edelbrock intake gasket with a GM gasket. Before I carried the truck to the dealer I measured the vacuum in each valve cover with a inches of WC gauge with the pcv system unhooked. I noticed no vacuum on the gauge after a extended idle so I'd say the intake gasket didn't leak.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 04-20-2013, 09:50 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Ga.
Posts: 6
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Looks like the intake gasket was my problem. The bottom side of gasket did not crush and oil was pulled from the lifter valley to Number 2 and 4. The engine does not smoke now when starting it or after an extended period of idling. I'll drive it for a few days and watch the oil level.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 04-21-2013, 07:24 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 19
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have all GM gaskets of my motor. That was the first question the asked my installer. As if there parts are the best. lol... But given the way they they try to wear us down, that will probably be next for me... As mentioned earlier, this is not my daily driver and GM wants miles on the motor before they will investigate futher. So I am working on that and so for the consumption is better since they sealed the stems, but still under 1000/Qt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #43 (permalink)  
Old 04-21-2013, 08:45 PM
gonzo08383's Avatar
Registered User
 

Last journal entry: brakes
Last photo:
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 233
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 12
Thanked 20 Times in 16 Posts
most likely shouldn't use synthetic before the engine is broken in. usually takes 500 miles or so to fully break in a motor. I've built a few and none have ever smoked, ever. usual culprits are valve seals, improper ring installment, too much oil, leaking rear main(2 pc seals are infamous for this), wrong oil type. I recommend 15w-40 rotella for break in. switch to synthetic after 1000 miles.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #44 (permalink)  
Old 04-22-2013, 09:31 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Ga.
Posts: 6
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I drove my truck yesterday about 75 miles and the oil level has not moved a bit so far. I must admit the dealer's service dept that I bought the engine from has been very good to deal with. This engine has some torque reminds me of driving a big block.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #45 (permalink)  
Old 06-25-2013, 09:03 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 19
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Im Back... GMPP Makes Good I Think???

If you have followed for the last 7 months or so I have had two GMPP ZZ383 Strokers that have been oil users. The first one GM replaced after less than 1500 miles because it flunked a leakdown test. So they sent a new one. That motor used oil at a lower rate, but still unacepatble. So thay had my installer try a few things and then had me put over 4000 miles on the motor. No improvement. Well I just brought it back, post 4000 miles, and GM has decided to send another motor. So I am hoping that three is my lucky number and after this motor is broken in I can finally drive my car without documenting everything I do. Just want to run my car and enjoy it. One would have thought that for the $$ I spent I would have been doing that almost 1 year ago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Tags
gmpp 383 stroker, new 383 crate, new zz383, zz383 break in, zz383 oil

Recent Engine posts with photos

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name (usually not your first and last name), your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:
Insurance
Please select your insurance company (Optional)

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
oil consumption 2old2fast Engine 9 04-26-2016 04:37 PM
So frustrated/oil consumption bygddy Engine 13 06-10-2011 11:35 AM
New build oil consumption??? CJ_1080 Engine 28 06-05-2011 12:48 PM
Oil consumption due to possible sucking oil from intake valley..signs ? y2k600f4 Engine 10 07-31-2010 04:40 AM
oil consumption 4doorjoe Engine 10 07-04-2005 06:20 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright Hotrodders.com 1999 - 2012. All Rights Reserved.