I read the article ...pics on the mag cover. Very exciting...if I had the $$ I'd buy one and start a '69 Camaro. Stated in the article that they are still in the process of getting licensing with GM for the name "Camaro" to be used with the product. I think GM would be stupid not to do it.
I read the article ...pics on the mag cover. Very exciting...if I had the $$ I'd buy one and start a '69 Camaro. Stated in the article that they are still in the process of getting licensing with GM for the name "Camaro" to be used with the product. I think GM would be stupid not to do it.
Even without GM's blessing the car can be sold under a different name... and yes GM will ding them for every unit they sell if ....if they give rights to the name. Like I said before GM would be stupid not to do it since there are die-hard Camaro lovers out there that will buy this repro...
A resonable fee will bring in good returns for GM but if they jack it up too high they'll get nothing. They have to be smart about it and make it a reasonable rights fee and people can still have a "2004-1969 Camaro".
I wonder just how accurate they are? Would factory '69 Camaro parts fit, or would there be a difference.
Not like it really matters, as long as I can't tell its not a real one, I'd buy it.
bonuts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
Hot Rod Forum
2.2M posts
175.7K members
Since 2001
A forum community dedicated to hot rod owners and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about restoration, builds, performance, modifications, classifieds, troubleshooting, maintenance, and more!