New York Times and Science Magazine debunk biofuels - Page 6 - Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board
Hotrodders.com -- Hot Rod Forum



Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Unanswered Posts Auto Escrow Insurance Auto Loans
Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board > General Discussion> Hotrodders' Lounge
User Name
Password
lost password?   |   register now

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #76 (permalink)  
Old 02-22-2008, 06:41 PM
Registered User
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: kansas
Age: 67
Posts: 515
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
sounds kinda like I'm out numbered here....I guess in a way, it's the nmuber 1 guy, or owner, who's responsilble for what kind of research and or engineering that gets done, but then he's limited to what ever , by customer demand ???? Help me out here , guys........
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #77 (permalink)  
Old 02-22-2008, 08:35 PM
grouch's Avatar
Registered User
 
Last wiki edit: How to document your project
Last journal entry: 1949 Olds -- Rotisserie, pt. 9
Last photo:
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: KY
Posts: 1,143
Wiki Edits: 2

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by knighthawk
sounds kinda like I'm out numbered here....I guess in a way, it's the nmuber 1 guy, or owner, who's responsilble for what kind of research and or engineering that gets done, but then he's limited to what ever , by customer demand ???? Help me out here , guys........
I have to agree with your earlier complaint about it taking so long to see improvements hit the market. That's the pace of big business. Mass markets don't usually change fast. Big marketers follow those markets; they don't lead. That is fine when the commodity being sold fits the times and needs. However, it's not so fine when the inertia of mass marketing prolongs obsolescence.

When I see the title, "New York Times and Science Magazine debunk biofuels", my first thought is, "Who is debunking the debunkers?" Why are we so dependent on a single fuel, petroleum, right now? Why should we assume that a single replacement needs to be found? The only answer I can think of that makes sense for those last two questions is mass marketers.

It seems pretty obvious to most people that we're not going to replace all our current petroleum needs with moonshine or leftover chicken grease from KFC. What is there to "debunk"? How about debunking the notion that we must continue being single-fuel dependent until we are rescued from that dependence by some MegaCorp?

Individuals and small businesses are already providing alternatives. They just don't show up much on tv. You don't get much advertising for building a Harley that smells like french fries or an electric commuter that outlives several commuters.

The major car manufacturers will produce vehicles that people demand of them. They will also resist changes to their current market as long as possible. Instead of pointing out that 'consumers' waste 65% to 80% of every gallon of gasoline, mass producers point out that an electric commuter is not practical for long trips and that you can't fill up with biodiesel on every street corner. They will also point out that current electrical production (no pun intended) also uses petroleum and produces pollution, without noting the reductions of each compared to vehicles using internal combustion engines.

This marketing delays the time when capital-intensive retooling has to take place. The benefits of mass production are therefore denied to alternatives to the existing vehicle production. The alternatives have to come as aftermarket adaptations to be economically viable. Remember that the huge performance parts market of today grew from individuals working things out on their own hotrods.

The history of hotrodders is one of pushing the envelope. The bounds of that envelope today include the cost of fuel and what gets wasted. There are diesel dragsters and electric dragsters. (The first diesel dragster to get into the 7's runs on biodiesel).

I don't expect 'salvation' from mass marketers. I expect them to lag 10 - 40 years behind as they've always done. I also expect them to fight each change that might have an impact on any given quarter's profit margin and to wage that fight both by honest means and by 'stealthy' ones.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Recent Hotrodders' Lounge posts with photos

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name (usually not your first and last name), your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright Hotrodders.com 1999 - 2012. All Rights Reserved.