Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board - View Single Post - New York Times and Science Magazine debunk biofuels
View Single Post
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 02-12-2008, 12:07 PM
timothale timothale is offline
Registered User
Last wiki edit: General Motors transmissions Last photo:
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: near Yellowstone park
Posts: 5,124
Wiki Edits: 27

Thanks: 35
Thanked 488 Times in 431 Posts
what is the real answer

If it is in the paper it must be true.?? I wrote an article that "Automotive Industries " (the largest auto trade magazine) published in the 70's about alcohol based fuels. A GM Vice president, I think his name was Maier, was interviewed in a previous issue and listed reasons why GM was opposesd to alcohol based fuels, He stated a number of reasons which I refuted and listed the footnotes to support my answers, University studies, etc Ford of Brazil ,and energy consumption required to produce 'bio-fuels' data.. If you are just going to burn it in your motor, you don't have to worry about how it tastes or it makin' you go blind. USP (medical grade) products are not required for motor fuel. A lot of the published expert studies are too much in the lab and not real world.
Reply With Quote