Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board - Reply to Topic
Hotrodders.com -- Hot Rod Forum



Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Unanswered Posts Auto Escrow Insurance Auto Loans
Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board > Tech Help> Engine> Modern Electronic Engines> 3.8 - 4.3
User Name
Password
lost password?   |   register now

Thread: 3.8 - 4.3 Reply to Thread
Title:
  
Message:
Trackback:
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name (usually not your first and last name), your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Topic Review (Newest First)
01-17-2012 12:48 PM
cobalt327
Quote:
Originally Posted by rusty rockerpanels
nope! no filing involved. Meds reek havoc with my memory, but I wouldn't have filed it out. there might have been a 92 305 laying around, but I was pretty sure The flex plate came off 229. I don't relish the thought of pulling it back out just to look. I suppose I could put stick flywheel back on and fire it on the ground. thank you for your response
Rusty rocker-panels


something about insulated gloves and snowmobile suit makes it hard to crawl under a car just now
I heard that! We're enjoying a very mild winter here- so far.

The flexplate wouldn't have bolted on (229 is 2-piece RMS, the '90's 4.3L is 1-piece RMS- they have different bolt patterns), so no worries there. The only 4.3L V6 Chev engine that could have used the 229 flexplate is the very first year of the 4.3L- '85.

So as long as the starter nose matches the diameter of the flexplate- and the holes in the block for the correct starter are present and accounted for- you are good to go. In my experience, the only engine that may be a problem is a 229 V6 Chevy, as some or all had only the side by side starter bolt holes for the smaller flexplate from the factory, and on the 229 engine I had experience w/this problem (a '81) was also lacking enough "meat" to drill the offset outer hole.

01-17-2012 12:28 PM
rusty rockerpanels
flywheel

nope! no filing involved. Meds reek havoc with my memory, but I wouldn't have filed it out. there might have been a 92 305 laying around, but I was pretty sure The flex plate came off 229. I don't relish the thought of pulling it back out just to look. I suppose I could put stick flywheel back on and fire it on the ground. thank you for your response
Rusty rocker-panels


something about insulated gloves and snowmobile suit makes it hard to crawl under a car just now
01-17-2012 05:42 AM
cobalt327
Quote:
Originally Posted by Two8tyThree
Correct, but he did say he used it on his mid 90's 4.3L? Did he file the holes?
I see that now. Good catch. I don't know, but he's in for a rude awakening if he hasn't bolted it up yet!
01-16-2012 07:34 PM
against all odds Whoops. Didn't catch that. Yes, 1pc and 2pc seal flexplates not compatable. 85 4.3 could take a 229 flexplate, 86 and later can't.

i guess that explains why the crate zz383, 383ht and others that i was looking at last night come with an externally balanced flexplate----because they have the newer 1pc rear seal.
01-16-2012 07:10 PM
Two8tyThree
Quote:
Originally Posted by cobalt327
The 229 flex won't bolt up to a 1-piece rear main seal crank.
Correct, but he did say he used it on his mid 90's 4.3L? Did he file the holes?
01-16-2012 12:08 PM
cobalt327 The 229 flex won't bolt up to a 1-piece rear main seal crank.
01-16-2012 09:08 AM
Two8tyThree
Quote:
Originally Posted by rusty rockerpanels
... I also used the flex plate off 229 on 350 turbo tranny. Havent gotten it started yet but am beginning to doubt my thinking. Any imput ???
Don't use the 229 flex plate on a 4.3L, you will end up with a shaker. The 4.3L V6 and the Vortec 350 sbc have an external weight in the flex plate for balancing. Get one of these flex plates.

GM Changes to the sbc (From GM website):
1986 The rear main seal was changed from a 2-piece rubber design to a 1-piece rubber design that used a mounting appliance to hold it in place. This necessitated a change in the flywheel/flexplate bolt pattern, as well as the need for an externally balanced flexplate/flywheel.
01-15-2012 03:18 PM
Two8tyThree Here is a previous post on the 4.3L V6 distributor:
http://www.hotrodders.com/forum/what...evy-77568.html
01-15-2012 09:53 AM
rusty rockerpanels
3.8 - 4.3

Thank you VERY much for your responses. I was not aware of my own ignorance. I thought if it wasn't even fire it was odd fire, thank you very much AGAINST ALL ODDS for semi-even-fire. Every question answered spawns 3 new questions, I'm well on my way to being the most ignorant man I know.


Thank you very sincerely
Rusty Rocker-panels

It isn't so much you know what you like, as you like what you know !
01-15-2012 03:05 AM
cobalt327
Quote:
Originally Posted by rusty rockerpanels
recently I decided to downsize from 350 chevy to 4.3 in my 38 dodge. The motor going in is 4.3, mid 90's TBI all computer contolled, I wanted it carberated so I pulled the intake and carb off 229. Ports are a little smaller but bolted up. Then I took 229 HEI, and thinking one engine is oddfire and the other is even fire I put magnetic pickup out of straight 6 HEI in the distributer. I also used the flex plate off 229 on 350 turbo tranny. Havent gotten it started yet but am beginning to doubt my thinking. Any imput ???
Did you notice the 229 2 bbl. intake is a 360 ('open plenum') design?

I think the only way you'd see much of an increase in MPG is if you kept the EFI on the 4.3L V6. You could have swapped a Dualjet carb and intake to the 350 and gotten about the same results IMHO.

Your scheme for the distributor will work fine. The problem comes when the 4.3L even fire distributor is used on the semi-even fire 200/229. Even the info on Skip White ebay ad for their V6 distributor says it'll work on both the 4.3L and the 229cid V6 engines. I wrote them to ask about this, along w/a reference to a chrome moly ring that's actually molybdenum inlaid. They responded on the rings (said they'd correct the ad) but never said squat about the distributor.
01-14-2012 03:16 PM
against all odds All 200, 229 and 262 cranks are INTERNALLY balanced; So, you can use any small block flexplate(the 229 is good) that is not balanced---except for the 400's. This is according to the 90 chevrolet power manual chapter 4, pg 19. i know it's not real current but all those engines were produced before 90 and the thus info is still correct regardless.

Good luck and go for it; i'm leaning towards this engine for hi-po work believe it or not.


P.S. correction---the correct term is semi-even fire for the 200 and 229 because cylinder firings happen at 132 degrees, 108 degrees, 132, 108 and so on. The 262/4.3 is even fire because firings happen each 120 degrees---you probably already knew that. And the odd fire is the hardcore common pin crank for hi-po work---150, 90, 150, 90 etc. firings.
01-14-2012 08:24 AM
against all odds
Quote:
Originally Posted by rusty rockerpanels
the star wheel (magnetic pick up assembly) I put in the distributor came out of a straight 6 (250) and is even fire. My primary concern is with the balance. The 262 had a stick shift flywheel, as I am using a 350 turbo tranny I used the flex plate from the 229. The question is whether it is a balanced assembly or independently balanced ? ALSO if it is a balanced assembly can this be fixed by changing the harmonic balancer ? HELP PLEASE



IF YOU CAN CONCEIVE IT, YOU CAN ACHIEVE IT
Give me a few hrs.
01-13-2012 10:30 AM
whyholdback The 4.3 swap may help, but think on this for a while:
I had a '78 Camaro 350 doing 8 MPG. Of course I tried swapping the carburetor and such, but the only thing I did to it that made a dramatic improvement in MPG was a $100 700R-4 from a salvage yard. I did a shift kit, a new filter, and a lockup kit, plus had to get the driveshaft shortened. Final cost under $500. Final MPG, with no centrifugal advance working in my '78 HEI: 25.1 MPG at 65 MPH. This was the same Q-Jet that was giving me 8 MPG before. This was with the 5" rear spoiler, 215/60R15x7 front, 235/60R15x8 rear and a 3.08:1 axle.
As for the 4.3, I had 2 give amazing mileage. The first was in a '94 Chev C1500 W/T, a full-size, regular-cab, long-bed 2WD pickup with a/c, 4L60E ( same as 700R-4 ) and 3.73:1 axle on 235/75R15x7s. It averaged 23 MPG, with a best of 26.
I then had an '89 S-10 2WD regular cab short bed with every option. I had to swap the rear axle, and then I had to get the speedometer corrected. I consistently got 28 MPG at 70 MPH with this: TBI 4.3 / 700R-4 / 3.42:1 / 235/60r15x8s, lowered 2", tailgate down, and 4" front airdam.
But the performance difference between my S-10 and my Camaro was well worth giving up a few MPG.
A week before I sold that Camaro I finally rebuilt the distributor. I know that had I re-checked the MPG at 60 MPH, it would have showed 27. Put it in a third-generation Trans Am, it would do 28.
Sell your 4.3, reinstall your 350, sell your TH350, install a 700R-4, swap your 2.73:1 gears for 3.08:1 gears, and keep the car fun as well as efficient.
01-13-2012 09:09 AM
rusty rockerpanels
star wheel

the star wheel (magnetic pick up assembly) I put in the distributor came out of a straight 6 (250) and is even fire. My primary concern is with the balance. The 262 had a stick shift flywheel, as I am using a 350 turbo tranny I used the flex plate from the 229. The question is whether it is a balanced assembly or independently balanced ? ALSO if it is a balanced assembly can this be fixed by changing the harmonic balancer ? HELP PLEASE



IF YOU CAN CONCEIVE IT, YOU CAN ACHIEVE IT
01-13-2012 08:37 AM
against all odds i think what you're concerned about is the distributor compatability between the two engines?

If that is the case, then NO you cannot and should not use the 3.8's distributor in the 4.3! This is due to the even vs. odd-fire differences. At the very least the "star wheel" will have to be swapped for an even fire "star."

i think all 3 engines---200,229 and 262 are internal balanced but i will get back to you on that.
This thread has more than 15 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright Hotrodders.com 1999 - 2012. All Rights Reserved.