Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board - Reply to Topic
Hotrodders.com -- Hot Rod Forum



Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Unanswered Posts Auto Escrow Insurance Auto Loans
Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board > Tech Help> Engine> New Cam Advice
User Name
Password
lost password?   |   register now

Thread: New Cam Advice Reply to Thread
Title:
  
Message:
Trackback:
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name (usually not your first and last name), your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Topic Review (Newest First)
01-10-2007 11:14 AM
74chevyflat
heads cam and converter

if you decide to sell your existing Dart215 heads, and converter drop me an e-mail rednekgeneral69@hotmail.com.
01-09-2007 05:32 PM
71C10 [/QUOTE]I will take your advice and not go with a bigger cam[/QUOTE]

Both cams listed in your first post are smaller then your current cam...

[/QUOTE]but instead continue to save my money for some AFR 190's....I took some ill advice from the guy at the speed shop he talked me into the Dart pro1 215's as soon as I drove the car I new I had made a mistake...The are nice heads but as you guys said not enough cubes.....I will save them for another build.[/QUOTE]

Maybe spend the AFR head money on a .060 over crank kit for your block and stroke it to better fit your Dart 215's! That would give you a 388 with a 3.750 crank or a 401 with a 3.875 crank.

[/QUOTE]Also i did call that guy Joe Sherman...He would not give me the time of day unless i was going to buy a engine from him..He was real jerk... [/QUOTE]

I don't know what to say except it doesn't reflect my experience and I've never purchased a complete engine from him, but I have purchased parts.

Did you buy the 64cc or 72cc combustion chamber Dart 215's and did you have them milled? What are the specs for your pistons?

If you replace your heads with a pair that has smaller intake runners, you still don't have enough converter (or gear in my opinion) for your current cam.
01-09-2007 03:21 PM
xntrik
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnsongrass1
A Dart 180 would suffice.

You could sell those heads for 5 to 800 around here.

Agree.

Rule of thumb on SBC is cubes x 50 % = port volume for street performance.

cubes x 55 % = volume for high rpm useage.

You want the port air velocity at an rpm range you can use effectively.

Several tests have shown that AFRs flow better for the port size. = more power.
01-09-2007 02:26 PM
johnsongrass1
Quote:
Originally Posted by 65Guera
Thanks all for you comments and advice.......
I will take your advice and not go with a bigger cam but instead continue to save my money for some AFR 190's....I took some ill advice from the guy at the speed shop he talked me into the Dart pro1 215's as soon as I drove the car I new I had made a mistake...The are nice heads but as you guys said not enough cubes.....I will save them for another build.

Also i did call that guy Joe Sherman...He would not give me the time of day unless i was going to buy a engine from him..He was real jerk...
A Dart 180 would suffice.

You could sell those heads for 5 to 800 around here.
01-09-2007 12:23 PM
xntrik
Quote:
Originally Posted by 65Guera
Thanks all for you comments and advice.......
I will take your advice and not go with a bigger cam but instead continue to save my money for some AFR 190's....I took some ill advice from the guy at the speed shop he talked me into the Dart pro1 215's as soon as I drove the car I new I had made a mistake...The are nice heads but as you guys said not enough cubes.....I will save them for another build.

Also i did call that guy Joe Sherman...He would not give me the time of day unless i was going to buy a engine from him..He was real jerk...

Interesting. Every time I have talked to Joe he has been the nicest person and wanted to visit about our hot rodding experience beyond my technical inquiry. I have never done $ 1 worth of business with him.

Maybe somebody was kicking his cat.
01-08-2007 03:33 PM
65Guera Thanks all for you comments and advice.......
I will take your advice and not go with a bigger cam but instead continue to save my money for some AFR 190's....I took some ill advice from the guy at the speed shop he talked me into the Dart pro1 215's as soon as I drove the car I new I had made a mistake...The are nice heads but as you guys said not enough cubes.....I will save them for another build.

Also i did call that guy Joe Sherman...He would not give me the time of day unless i was going to buy a engine from him..He was real jerk...
01-08-2007 01:07 PM
xntrik
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guy Hiltz
If you are looking for long term longevity you might want to shy away from an off the shelf street series Comp solid roller cam,turns out they arent made from billet steel as I had thought they were, but are made from an austempered ductile iron which has a hardened surface that can wear.If it has an 8 as the last part number this is what it is.I went from an older Crane solid roller to the XR280R Comp grind and was a bit dissapointed,it lost on the bottom end,had a bit more on the top end,but sure didnt feel as good.I`m going to be changing cams next rebuild and I dont think I will be using another Comp Cams product.

Just curious here. Not being a smart-a..s.

If you chose a ductile iron cam OR if you chose a grind that did not perform as you hoped, is either a fault of CompCams..?????

All engines are combinations and some parts work together better than others. Often minimal spec changes are quite noticable.

Did you try altering the lifter clearances to see if the cam is too big or too small for your combination? Did you alter cam timing to adjust for variations in combination? Often cam changes need fuel mixture and timing tweaking.
01-08-2007 12:51 PM
xntrik
Quote:
Originally Posted by 454C10
I think you got that back-wards. A split duration cam typically makes an engine run rougher due to more overlap.

For example a 270/270 degree cam ground on 110 lobe separation will have 50 degrees of overlap. A 270/280 cam cam ground or 110 lobe separation will have 55 degrees of overlap.


As to your split duration comment. It depends on if the intake is less, or the exhaust is more than the comparison cam. He is considering splitting to a shorter intake, thereby reducing the overlap minimally.

My poor choice of wording.
I should have said

"I think it would be a waste of money to change. You already have an outrageously large set of heads and cam for your cubes/compression.

..... If you were to use more cam the dynamic compression and the overall combination would be worse. You compression likes a 224-230* cam. Crutching the combination with a minimumly smaller cam would be disappointing in my opinion. Not much will help the slow port velocity of those large heads that like 7000 rpm on a 355 cube.

Luckily you have a dual plane intake which crutches the cam overlap. If you had a single plane intake it would be rough idle and be horrible to drive. YOu would drop 4" idle vacuum. You probably also have very large headers.

The heads and cam might be matched to each other, but not matched to the intake and cubic inches as the heads/cam implies a race car.

I would go for a maximum chassis dyno tune-up to see what you can get from what you already have, and then carefully consider changes. In my opinion your combination is ill chosen.

I would look to cam timing, ignition curve, and fuel mixture as already suggested by this forum crew.

Trouble is, chassis dyno time will eat your money and might net you minimal gains.
01-08-2007 10:54 AM
firestone It seems to me that your heads and cam are matched OK right now. Your cam could be bigger, but I dont think it is out of the ballpark. The compression is a little low for the current cam you have though, so I think the fact that you did not go any bigger on the cam is a good thing. Being that your heads are as large as they are, I dont know that going with a smaller cam would gain you the low end power you are looking for. I think you would be better off buying a 3500 converter to get the stall speed more into the powerband when you hit the gas. When you sell the cam and heads, you could also sell the converter with them.

Adam
01-08-2007 07:47 AM
454C10 I think you got that back-wards. A split duration cam typically makes an engine run rougher due to more overlap.

For example a 270/270 degree cam ground on 110 lobe separation will have 50 degrees of overlap. A 270/280 cam cam ground or 110 lobe separation will have 55 degrees of overlap.
01-07-2007 02:21 PM
xntrik
Quote:
Originally Posted by 65Guera
Hi All
I received $400.00 in gift certificates from our local speed shop.
And was thinking on a new cam the XR280R or the XR274R....
I dont know if this would be a good upgrade or not......Any advice would
be greatly appreciated...

I have a 357 SBC .30 over
Forged pistons
6.0 rods
10:01 comp.
Lunati roller cam and lifters 248 duration @ .050...555 lift
Roller rockers 1.6
Dart 215 pro1 aluminum heads
Demon 750
Airgap intake
Transmission 700R4
MSD ready to run dist and 6AL ignition box
373 rear gears
2800 stall

I think it would be a waste of money to change. You already have an outrageously large set of heads and cam for your cubes/compression and more cam might really hurt the mid range due to duration and dynamic compression loss.
01-05-2007 05:09 PM
bonzipenguins Another advantage on dual patterns is slightly smoother at the same durations,and more vacuum.But other than that there isnt much it does for performance.Sometimes single patterns will still make power past that of the dual patterns.
01-05-2007 03:18 AM
Guy Hiltz
New Cam Advice

71C10 wanted to see the differences between my old cam and my new one so I found the old cam card.The cam that was in my car when I bought it was a Crane solid roller part # 138021,valve lift was .567 for intake & exhaust,duration @ .050 was 234 intake and 244 exhaust.The new Comp solid roller is part # 11-771-8,valve lift is .646 intake & .653 exhaust, duration @ .050 is 242 intake and 248 exhaust.For what its worth,the old Crane cam lasted for over 15 years,and if I had of known that the squealing noise that I thought was the alternator was actually a lifter,I could have put new lifters in and probably still be running that cam.
01-04-2007 07:09 AM
454C10 Only 300 on the dyno means your engine isn't making the power it should or the dyno is wrong. Have you ran any timed 1/4 miles?

You combo should be making about 350 rwhp even with the mismatch of parts. So, maybe you should find out where the problem is before installing new parts. What is your total timing? Did you measure air/fuel ratio on the dyno? Checked cylinder pressure?

Yes, the cam and heads are too big for your combo. Get a smaller cam and head cc or add more cr, more gear, and more stall. A smaller cam would help but as you know already, those heads are killing low speed torque.

Typically heads that flow well don't need split durations or narrow lobe centers to aid in cylinder filling. However, narrower lobe centers will allow the intake valve to close earlier which will make more dynamic compression ratio and help low speed torque. Have you tried advancing the cam 4 more degrees?
01-04-2007 05:21 AM
71C10 I was hoping Guy would give us his old vs new info as well...

I like to go higher than the "bare" minimum advertised compression, stall and gear recommendations. http://www.holley.com/50157.asp

Maybe you should consider more converter (since your below the minimum recommended) until your ready to build a new motor?

Take your car down to Joe, you'll find him "very" straight forward and honest with his opinions.

Let us know what he says.
This thread has more than 15 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright Hotrodders.com 1999 - 2012. All Rights Reserved.