Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board - Reply to Topic
Hotrodders.com -- Hot Rod Forum



Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Unanswered Posts Auto Escrow Insurance Auto Loans
Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board > General Discussion> Hot Rod Art> Car Sketches
User Name
Password
lost password?   |   register now

Thread: Car Sketches Reply to Thread
Title:
  
Message:
Trackback:
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name (usually not your first and last name), your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Topic Review (Newest First)
12-03-2007 11:59 PM
DVierstra
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobbyG-39
I prefer this one, designed by my friend Steve Gilmore. This is something actually realizable as a production car, too!



I guess you are somewhat biased because he's your friend. To be truthful I think they are both cool designs. But I also heard that they may both end up as Hot Wheels die cast models. Let's be realistic...neither one would make it to production...at least for the next five to ten years...then cars will drive them selves!

Here's on that may Actually be produced: The Chevy Volt.


Went to the EV show in Anaheim CA over the weekend and there was the Volt and this 2007 Electric Mustang that went from 0-60 in four seconds flat! Electric Muscle cars are coming!!
12-03-2007 09:29 PM
BobbyG-39
Quote:
Originally Posted by powerrodsmike
I thought the same as Malc, that the window area was way too small, so small in fact that it would be illegal. (I'm sure that there are visibility standards set by FMVSS somewwhere) Also, it seems the hood line would further obstruct vision to the point that you would need a periscope to drive it.

When you said that this would be a car that could actually see production, I didn't realize you meant as a toy. Nowhere in your post did you say this design was for Hot Wheels.
I actually meant it was more "producable" than the yellow one shown earlier. Both were HotWheels designs, which you are right, I neglected to mention.

yep there are visibility standards, but it depends on the H point ( driver's hip point ) which sets the eye ellipse in relation to the glass. But look at the Audi TT, and you will see its dropped chopped top requires you to sit back one car length from the street lights ( like a chopped deuce ) in order to see it. Its a delicate balance between accepting a decrease in usability for coolness. But judging by how many hot rodders there are, I think the choice is clear!
12-03-2007 09:07 PM
BobbyG-39
Quote:
Originally Posted by malc
I was looking at one of these downtown today parked amongst our European egg shapes.
I like the short windows, which I feel couldīnt be any shorter, and deep sides.

This the Dodge Magnum in the US sold w/ the Chrysler front end in Europe. What sucks is they're cancelling it. It was a great interpretation of the old cool wagons of the 60s and 70s.

The short windows to high bodyside is nothing more than the old hot rod trick of chopping the top to get a down-low mean look. Though we have fancy professional phrases for that. In this case its the "low-greenhouse ( roof/glass- get it ? ) to high bodyside", or "chopped DLO ( Day Light Opening) to a rising beltline." Any way you say it, it looks cool...

Compare it to the competing Ford Taurus X ( nee Freestyle ) and you'll see what I mean:
12-03-2007 09:00 PM
BobbyG-39
Quote:
Originally Posted by Job~Rated
I agree, but an altered or fabricated vehicle also has to fall within certain guidelines - height of headlamps from the ground etc.
Depends on the state and who pulls you over

I've seen many deuces with headlights dragging the ground. Check these as well:

Billettproof pix on VW Vortex

Billettproof Gallery on Webshots
12-03-2007 08:54 PM
BobbyG-39
Quote:
Originally Posted by malc
For cars shaped like t66turbocobro drew we over here in europe have plenty,
check this thing out from Seat, owned by VW

Yep, the two-box ( hatchback in US ) or one-box ( minivan ) shapes are very popular in Europe due to their space efficiency ( big inside, small outside for cheap petrol and limited physical space for roads and parking ) Virtually every European manufacturer has them. The Renault Espace and Megane are good ones, as are several Citroens, Fiats, Peugeots, etc.

Even good old Ford has plenty:
Ford Ka
Fiesta, and Focus C-Max and S-Max.

I look at these, especially the Focus C-Max and S-Max as 21st versions of my panel wagon, even more so than the HHR. Because the HHR is purpose-built, whereas these were adapted from normal passenger vehicles in the way panel and sedan deliveries were....


The Seats are essentially more stylish VWs- I think its the Cupra is a re-bodied Lupo, whereas the Leon is a re-bodied Golf ( Rabbit here in the US ). When VW bought Spanish automaker Seat, it blew away all the old stuff, and based new Seats on VW platforms.

Anyway, I drove a Megane Scenic when I was in Spain a few months ago, and I loved it. I wish I could have one of those here to make into a Panel Wagon and hot-rod it with some Alpine or Abarth performance parts....
12-03-2007 07:22 PM
Rob Keller Looks Like Cadzilla Got left @ Pixar studios In da hood.





Grillz






R
12-03-2007 11:37 AM
Job~Rated I agree, but an altered or fabricated vehicle also has to fall within certain guidelines - height of headlamps from the ground etc.
12-03-2007 11:34 AM
malc Thatīs an altered vehicle not production.
Vehicle makers have to abide by construction laws.
12-03-2007 10:20 AM
Job~Rated
Quote:
Originally Posted by powerrodsmike
(I'm sure that there are visibility standards set by FMVSS somewwhere)
We don't seem to have those kinds of restrictions here in the UK...

12-03-2007 10:20 AM
malc For cars shaped like t66turbocobro drew we over here in europe have plenty,
check this thing out from Seat, owned by VW
12-03-2007 09:48 AM
malc I was looking at one of these downtown today parked amongst our European egg shapes.
I like the short windows, which I feel couldīnt be any shorter, and deep sides.

12-03-2007 08:13 AM
powerrodsmike
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobbyG-39

As far as the visibility comment, remember this design was for a Hot Wheels, and Steve hit the nail on the head as far the proper proportions for that size. In other words, the design has to scale down to 1:64 ( the big model is a 1:5 scale ) so in the larger size, it will of course look somewhat cartoonish with mafia-slit windows....Look at any Hot Wheels car and you will see the proportions have been modified to work at the smaller size ( scaled up, most of the wheels would be something like 30s, too. )


Of course, I am biased

I thought the same as Malc, that the window area was way too small, so small in fact that it would be illegal. (I'm sure that there are visibility standards set by FMVSS somewwhere) Also, it seems the hood line would further obstruct vision to the point that you would need a periscope to drive it.

When you said that this would be a car that could actually see production, I didn't realize you meant as a toy. Nowhere in your post did you say this design was for Hot Wheels.

It is a cool design though. It reminds me of a comet with it's fireball following it around.

Later, mikey
12-03-2007 07:22 AM
BobbyG-39
Quote:
Originally Posted by malc
That is cool but has severe all round visibility problems.

"This is something actually realizable as a production car, too!"

Never, the market for such a car would be too small.
Remember 99.99% of people want a car to go from A to B and one they can fit the wife and kids into.
You are correct the market would be small, but if built as a niche vehicle off another existing platform would allow a "halo" vehicle that would be worth more to the brand's image than the actual volume of sales.

As far as the visibility comment, remember this design was for a Hot Wheels, and Steve hit the nail on the head as far the proper proportions for that size. In other words, the design has to scale down to 1:64 ( the big model is a 1:5 scale ) so in the larger size, it will of course look somewhat cartoonish with mafia-slit windows....Look at any Hot Wheels car and you will see the proportions have been modified to work at the smaller size ( scaled up, most of the wheels would be something like 30s, too. )

The skill of a good designer is being able to translate the beautiful concept into a production-reality design, and trust me, with normal Chrysler 300C amount window glass, this design loses nothing.....

Of course, I am biased
12-03-2007 12:53 AM
malc That is cool but has severe all round visibility problems.

"This is something actually realizable as a production car, too!"

Never, the market for such a car would be too small.
Remember 99.99% of people want a car to go from A to B and one they can fit the wife and kids into.
12-02-2007 07:08 PM
79C10 Heeeeyyyyy..... that's perrty neet-o. Looks like Billy Gibbons got hold of a new Chrysler 300 ! mad cool
This thread has more than 15 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright Hotrodders.com 1999 - 2012. All Rights Reserved.