Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board - Reply to Topic
Hotrodders.com -- Hot Rod Forum



Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Unanswered Posts Auto Escrow Insurance Auto Loans
Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board > Tech Help> Engine> Cam Choice with CR of only 8.4:1
User Name
Password
lost password?   |   register now

Thread: Cam Choice with CR of only 8.4:1 Reply to Thread
Title:
  
Message:
Trackback:
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name (usually not your first and last name), your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Topic Review (Newest First)
07-07-2003 01:46 AM
jimfulco Both of those cams have 204* intake duration (at .050"). The Crane has a little more lift, & may be slightly more aggressive (less seat-to-seat timing). The difference is not very much, and either would be noticeably better than the stock 305 cam.
07-06-2003 03:01 PM
meschnebly I also noticed that Edelbrock has a Performer Plus cam that looks like it might work for me at such a low CR. Think it would be much better than the stock one?

Mike
07-05-2003 03:41 PM
meschnebly I'm sorry I meant Crane Cams and they recommended the PowerMax H-260-2 cam and the description is "smooth idle, daily usage, off road, towing, economy". I guess it's better than stock but I was hoping that I could use a little more cam than that.

Mike
07-04-2003 12:27 PM
mstngjoe What cam did Comp tech recommend?
07-04-2003 08:48 AM
meschnebly Yep, it looks like I will have to stay with what I have in it or use a RV type cam. The cam that Comp Cams recomended to me was little more than a stock cam. I was hoping to have a little fun with this engine for the time I have to use it but..... I already have the intake, carb and headers for it so that's no expense and I was just hoping I could find a cam that would give it a little more go.

Mike
07-04-2003 02:16 AM
andybird just use thin head gaskets to get the compression up, if it's only going to be with you for 1 year, why bother putting money into it at all, just build a 350 like you know you want to
07-04-2003 01:15 AM
jimfulco Too much cam & too little compression. I did a 350 w/224* cam & low 8's compression many years ago. Didn't work well at all.
07-01-2003 02:57 PM
meschnebly Thanks for the suggestions. What do you guys think about the XE268H 224/230@050 477/480 lift 110lsa? Think that is too big? I'm kind of looking for the most bang and cam sound out of this motor for what it is.

Mike
07-01-2003 01:58 PM
mstngjoe Take a look at the Comp Cams XE series. They have some fast ramps that build great cylinder pressure. Should work very good on low cr engines.
07-01-2003 12:54 PM
78 monte I'd suggest the summit K1102 204/214@050 420/442lift 112 lsa.Its the same as the edelbrock performer cam,but for cheaper.It'll have a smooth idle but is a nice torquey cam.We had one in a 305 w/ a Torker(totaly wrong) and 3.55s and a tall tire an it run nice.
07-01-2003 12:28 PM
meschnebly Oh, one more thing. It has a stock converter in the tranny.

Mike
07-01-2003 06:20 AM
meschnebly Sorry about that. It's a 1977 Monza 2+2 so its pretty light. It has stock gearing and I think it's about 2.29:1 so.... not too good. In the future I am putting in an Auburn Posi with better gearing and Moser axles and I'm in the process of building a 383 stroker with a TH350 tranny but that wont get finished for at least a year. I wont be using this cam in the new engine. The last thing I want to do is loose low end torque. What do you guys suggest?

Mike
06-30-2003 11:43 PM
78 monte List all your specs rear gear,stall speed etc... or call a cam company.Having a cam thats too large for your compression will kill bottom end torque,but with say a steep gear,or a real light car or a 4 speed you can go a little bigger on cam size.
I run a XE262(218/224@050) with true 8.6:1 in a 350.
06-30-2003 09:08 PM
OldBucsFan Your cr is very close.....If they are available for your application, go with a thinner head gasket. That will boost the cr a little.
06-30-2003 08:36 PM
meschnebly
Cam Choice with CR of only 8.4:1

I'm working on a mild build of a 1977 305. I've got a Edelbrock Performer intake with an Edelbrock 600 4bbl for it. I would also like to put a little better cam in it while I've got it apart. I been looking at a couple of cams (Crane Energizer 274H06 and CompCams Magnum 270H) but it seems that they say you need a compression ratio of at least 8.75:1. This motor has a CR of only 8.4:1. I really dont want to do any head work on this motor as its only going to last me a year or so. Would one of these cams not work for me or would you recommend something else?

Mike

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright Hotrodders.com 1999 - 2012. All Rights Reserved.