Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board - Reply to Topic
Hotrodders.com -- Hot Rod Forum



Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Unanswered Posts Auto Escrow Insurance Auto Loans
Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board > Tech Help> Engine> Carb spacer or not?
User Name
Password
lost password?   |   register now

Thread: Carb spacer or not? Reply to Thread
Title:
  
Message:
Trackback:
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name (usually not your first and last name), your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Topic Review (Newest First)
11-21-2012 06:59 PM
Nemeth No access to a dyno but felt it dramatically!!!!!
11-16-2012 01:02 PM
techinspector1
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chevrolet4x4s View Post
Is the 500 with a 490 shot haha?
Shane
LMAO...........
11-16-2012 12:27 PM
vinniekq2 old thread, can you post your dyno runs on a new thread?
11-16-2012 12:22 PM
Nemeth
Carb spacers

Hello every one I had a 4 hole spacer atop my performer rpm air gap it really did not pull well.I have a sbc 383 rhs heads 180 cc runners 10.5 to 1 comp 236-242 @ ,050 .550 lift 110 lsa.670 worked avenger.
I installed a 1 inch open spacer....engine came to life and pulls hard mid range.
Seems an engine with after market heads and a decent size cam with a dual plane manifold do much better with open spacers.

How ever an engine with mild build like my 327 with vortec heads performer intake,600 eddy carb comp 218-224 @ .050 9 to1 comp run better with a 1 inch 4 hole spacer.Smaller builds need more velocity for the low end torque.

That is my conclusion after testing both engines with different spacers....

SO YES SPACERS USUALLY DO MAKE A BIG IMPACT ON ENGINE PERFORMANCE !!!!!!!!!!!!!
06-09-2010 01:45 AM
malc I went for the one inch spacer initially because I have the Airgap designed for the Q Jet which does not have the divider milled down.
The milled divider lets the motor get fuel from all four barrels of the carb,
when I had the four hole spacer each side was feeding off only two barrels,
didīnt idle well or accelerate smoothly.
Comparing my original one inch four hole spacer setup to my two inch open, itīs a world of difference car pulls much harder right off go.
06-08-2010 01:49 PM
V8 Super Beetle After looking at that video I have a question. Would the results of the RPM intake with the machined divider and a 2" open spacer yield similar results compared to an Air Gap with a open 1" spacer?

I have an RPM intake on my setup with a 2" open spacer and it didn't affect the bottom end any, that I can tell, cause I still can light them up around 2,000 rpm. Throttle response is still great, doesn't bog and I can't really tell the difference in top end performance yet cause either way I'm reaching for the "Oh *****" handle when I gas it.
06-08-2010 08:55 AM
Chevrolet4x4s Is the 500 with a 490 shot haha?
Shane
06-07-2010 03:22 PM
cobalt327
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chevrolet4x4s
Do they still make the stepped type four hole spacers? Supposed to have a venturi effect,I bought some 80s magazines the other day and was reading about them.
Shane
They're still around , THESE bust hell outta a buck fifty, some of them.

For a spacer.

'Course, it "Adds up to 47 HP naturally aspirated, and 500 HP with nitrous oxide."
06-06-2010 08:30 PM
Chevrolet4x4s Do they still make the stepped type four hole spacers? Supposed to have a venturi effect,I bought some 80s magazines the other day and was reading about them.
Shane
06-06-2010 07:16 PM
bammazon great video, I was actually debating between the air gap, and the Victor. Glad I decided to go with the air gap. Thanks for the input guys, I may try runnin it without the spacer and see what happens.
06-06-2010 06:05 PM
my87Z
Quote:
Originally Posted by malc
See my link in the post above.

shoot the CJTV through me off but that is the one
06-06-2010 04:58 PM
malc
Quote:
Originally Posted by my87Z
i dont think i would use a spacer with the air-gap intake but i would use it with the rpm intake, the air-gap already has a higher plenum like the victor but is still a dual plenum intake. i personaly am not a fan of the air-gap intakes i would rather use a performer rpm with the plenum divider notched and a 1" open spacer. if you look up bang suck blow on you tube you will see where they did comparisons of the victor intake, air-gap and rpm, then another comparison of the air-gap and a rpm with a notched plenum divider and 1" spacer.
See my link in the post above.
06-06-2010 03:48 PM
my87Z i dont think i would use a spacer with the air-gap intake but i would use it with the rpm intake, the air-gap already has a higher plenum like the victor but is still a dual plenum intake. i personaly am not a fan of the air-gap intakes i would rather use a performer rpm with the plenum divider notched and a 1" open spacer. if you look up bang suck blow on you tube you will see where they did comparisons of the victor intake, air-gap and rpm, then another comparison of the air-gap and a rpm with a notched plenum divider and 1" spacer.
06-06-2010 12:32 PM
malc You might find this CJTV video interesting.
I tried a one inch four hole spacer on my Edelbrock Air Gap and it was a disaster, then I tried a Summit aluminum one inch open, fanatastic.
Now Iīm using a Summit aluminum two inch open spacer, fantasticer.
06-06-2010 11:51 AM
cobalt327 A couple thoughts on spacers, not all-inclusive by any means-

Often as not, a spacer is a trial and error type thing. The best thing I can suggest is to do runs both with and w/o to determine whether your combo 'likes' one or not.

There are rules of thumb that I've heard through the years- "only use open spacers on open intakes"; "4-hole spacers only help the bottom end", "open plenum spacers need to be 2" to matter", "if you use an open spacer on a dual plane, it'll kill the bottom end", etc, ad nauseum. For every one of these "truisms", there's instances of the opposite results being obtained.

Sometimes the positive results are nothing more than the insulation properties of some spacer material that isolates the carb from heat.

A spacer WILL allow the fuel/air mixture to make the turn easier into the runners, this extra distance and increase in plenum volume can result in less signal felt at the boosters, which in turn can require more jet to compensate. Or not- that's the reason that you have to try them and compare the results.

Best bet IMO is to try them all and chart the results unless you have access to a dyno.
This thread has more than 15 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright Hotrodders.com 1999 - 2012. All Rights Reserved.