|10-06-2013 05:35 PM|
Wonder what happened with the OP on this one???
Opening post and then that's it???
|10-06-2013 05:27 PM|
|LATECH||More good info Stan Weiss' - Cylinder Head Flow Data at 28 Inches of Water -- DFW / FLW Flow Files for use with Engine Simulation Software|
|10-06-2013 05:25 PM|
BTW #360 BBC heads are not "peanut Port" they are small oval.
Apples to oranges.They still suck as bad as PP heads though.
With flow that low, and no significant increase from .500 lift to .700 lift , unported of course...it just doesnt add up.
|10-06-2013 05:19 PM|
|jokerZ71||Arless,when post incorrect info wether intentionally,or,even just from not knowing any better,someone here is gonna call ya on it.Even if not necessarily incorrect,but,anything contrary to what makes good sense.Some of your posts have been,for lack of a better word,unbelievable.Not everyone has to agree & often times we don't.Some of us have different ideas & can think outside of the box.However,when you make the claims,you should be able to back it up somehow,someway.You don't offer anything except wild exaggerated claims & then seem to get upset when someone questions you,or,asks you to validate or show some proof.It seems that you have some type of simulator program your playin with & posting the results here as actual builds & experience.IDK.These builds prolly only exist on your hard drive.If that's the case.Either your program needs some tweaking,or,data entry needs to do a better job.IDK for sure,but,I think it would be a safe bet to say that the JY 8:1 CR 500+ HP 454 you claim to have had dynoed & goes 8 seconds in your Chevelle is really exists on your computer since several ppl requested dyno sheets,time slips,etc,but,got nuthin except an attitude from you.If I had built that motor,i'd have proof posted everywhere.I apologize in advance if you prove me wrong.|
|10-06-2013 05:02 PM|
Good reading here. Especially Firestone' , F Bird and Techinspector post.
|10-06-2013 04:43 PM|
[QUOTE=arless;1816017] let it go man you act like your still a kid over nothing that concerns you. [QUOTE]
Being a Moderator there is plenty to concern me. I am no kid.
Youre messin with fire
Lose the attitude sonny.
|10-06-2013 04:28 PM|
|10-06-2013 03:16 PM|
|10-06-2013 02:30 PM|
No one is dissin you. He merely said "I Think" ... Not... "You are" if you read it correctly.
That does'nt translate to "You are incorrect".
You are getting uppity for no reason.
Allways room here for a healthy debate.
Besides the flow on those heads looks weak for a 500 HP mill. Just sayin.
|10-06-2013 12:44 PM|
I do not like sarcasm for help, I don't need help that talks to me like he talks to me.
|10-06-2013 05:35 AM|
Vinnie is being helpful. Havent you ever heard of the "Devils Advocate" ?
Lose the attitude and learn something. He is not badgering you, he's trying to help.
|10-06-2013 05:27 AM|
500 hp peanut port heads.
If you l@@k I,ve already answered this same question
|10-06-2013 04:38 AM|
100 54 45
200 124 102
300 195 118
400 216 141
500 235 157
600 236 168
|10-06-2013 12:32 AM|
|10-06-2013 12:23 AM|
Could you show the math on getting 500 HP from peanut port heads? which ones?how many CFM in stock peanut port heads?
are you sure those cam specs are correct for a mild engine?
why is the full spark advance in at 2200 rpm?
|This thread has more than 15 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.|