Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board - Reply to Topic
Hotrodders.com -- Hot Rod Forum



Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Unanswered Posts Auto Escrow Insurance Auto Loans
Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board > General Discussion> Hotrodders' Lounge> '70s cars, under appreciated?
User Name
Password
lost password?   |   register now

Thread: '70s cars, under appreciated? Reply to Thread
Title:
  
Message:
Trackback:
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name (usually not your first and last name), your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Topic Review (Newest First)
09-30-2014 10:24 PM
mud.man.rj
big block hmm.

New small block in the car but doesn't seem like much, may have to build a big block, my favorite engine.
09-30-2014 10:08 PM
Dragonoake
Quote:
Originally Posted by mud.man.rj View Post
Just bought a 70 Camaro SS tonight, will have to get pic's and post tomorrow. Small block auto w 12 bolt.
Back in the day, my buddy's brother had one with a 427/4-speed
09-30-2014 09:59 PM
mud.man.rj
70"s cars.

Just bought a 70 Camaro SS tonight, will have to get pic's and post tomorrow. Small block auto w 12 bolt.
09-29-2014 11:56 PM
BuzzLOL . My biggest complaint of 1970's cars was 1940's compression ratios being used with 1960's cams giving 7 - 9 MPG city and 10 - 13 MPG hiway... at best... soggy engines with little HP that were all done by 4500 RPMs... what I've always called: "The Dark Ages of Engines"... 1960's cars got much better MPG... MPG started coming back again about 1976, but only in the smallest cars to start with...
09-29-2014 11:18 PM
BuzzLOL
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragonoake View Post
In the mid-80's, you could have bought as many of the Gen 1 Camaros as you wanted for $500 a piece... Nobody wanted them unless they were SS or Z-28
. In early 1970's I sold my '65 GTO convertible with tri-power V8 and 4-speed for $400... it was perfect except for a little rust spot on the rocker panel on each side... insurance companies had slapped a big surcharge on 4-speed cars... it's worth a fortune today, if still around...

. Insurance companies didn't like car insurance back then, they wanted to sell life insurance policies... most people let their policies lapse before they died and they seldom had to pay off... then about 1980, AIDS came on the scene... car insurance has looked better and better to them ever since...
09-29-2014 09:46 PM
1971BB427
Quote:
Originally Posted by gearheadslife View Post
sure...
lets try facts shall we, the 2nd gen wasn't of any value until a few years ago.. the later cars are 9-11 years newer.. than the 70.5-73
the 77-78 t/a cleans the early cars clocks on worth as far as $$$ unless you get into the big block and the h.o's and SD of 73-4 . the older crowd that thinks the 71 back had more power.. and the ones that shockingly hate the 2nd gens when they got the wrap rear window, but are the sameones that cried about the new cars blind spots.. go fig.. the #'s matching crowd are the only ones that hold the early cars in more worth, the rest of the car world knows the newer cars handle better, drive better and the power is a rebuild away.. something a car that's 34 y/o or better will need anyways..
If you're into cars that cross a block and then mothballed, and that gets your rocks off, great.. the 79-81 z looks killer.. even with it's disco strip kit.. and not so costly that you'd be afraid to drive it.. most of those 70.5-73 f bodies that have any worth haven't cracked the secondaries in years in anger.. so they might as well have the 1981 lame 145hp as they are driving like rolls ..
Your generation is stuck in 72 or before.. everything after that blows...
those that were 7-13 when the 77's and later came out, like those more.. as it's what they grew up with.. some look at the car, some drive them.. fact is only the rs from the 70.5-73 look good.. the others look tame.. but that's my opinion.. I'll take a poncho thanks..
More ridiculous banter from you. Let's indeed look at facts.
The 2nd Gen Camaros NEVER changed suspension components throughout the 1970-81 years. The only major change was dropping the 8.2 10 bolt after 1970, and also dropping the 12 bolt after 1970. All the front and rear suspension that was offered in 1970, was still used in 1981, so where's the better handling?
Yes, you can build any engine Chevy made to more power than it came with. But that has little or nothing to do with a car's value. The value is in what the car came from the factory with, and the earlier 2nd gen Camaros are more valuable because they came with higher HP engines.
All that fugly disco plastic wasn't just ugly, it also had a huge amount of steel behind it, so beyond having an anemic engine, it carried around 300 lbs. of extra weight to further slow them down!
And finally, the early 2nd Gen Camaros were pre DEQ, so they don't have all that smog junk on them. They are exempt from federal EPA or DEQ testing, and thus you can run any engine you'd want to put in them (in most states) and not have to meet any state or federal testing. Start swapping the engine in your '74 or newer Camaro to get the power you'd like, and you'll soon find you've violated federal or state laws, and will have a off road use only car.
As for the TA cleaning any other F body's clock for value. Total BS. Why are you saying "unless it's a BB or HO, or SD"? Any early split bumper RS, or Z/28 will get every penny or more than a TA of later years.
You're either out of touch, or clueless about 2nd Gen F body cars. I've owned them long enough that I know what will or wont sell, and what the values are, and you're so far off track it's nuts.
Here's another thread I'll unsubscribe too, just to avoid having to debate with somebody who's clueless!
09-29-2014 08:30 PM
Dragonoake
Quote:
Originally Posted by gearheadslife View Post
lets try facts shall we, the 2nd gen wasn't of any value until a few years ago..
In the mid-80's, you could have bought as many of the Gen 1 Camaros as you wanted for $500 a piece... Nobody wanted them unless they were SS or Z-28
09-29-2014 08:19 PM
gearheadslife
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1971BB427 View Post
You really believe that's the only reason they're more popular and worth more? Don't be ridiculous. They're a much nicer looking style, and people hate all the plastic that is on later 2nd gen Camaros.
sure...
lets try facts shall we, the 2nd gen wasn't of any value until a few years ago.. the later cars are 9-11 years newer.. than the 70.5-73
the 77-78 t/a cleans the early cars clocks on worth as far as $$$ unless you get into the big block and the h.o's and SD of 73-4 . the older crowd that thinks the 71 back had more power.. and the ones that shockingly hate the 2nd gens when they got the wrap rear window, but are the sameones that cried about the new cars blind spots.. go fig.. the #'s matching crowd are the only ones that hold the early cars in more worth, the rest of the car world knows the newer cars handle better, drive better and the power is a rebuild away.. something a car that's 34 y/o or better will need anyways..
If you're into cars that cross a block and then mothballed, and that gets your rocks off, great.. the 79-81 z looks killer.. even with it's disco strip kit.. and not so costly that you'd be afraid to drive it.. most of those 70.5-73 f bodies that have any worth haven't cracked the secondaries in years in anger.. so they might as well have the 1981 lame 145hp as they are driving like rolls ..
Your generation is stuck in 72 or before.. everything after that blows...
those that were 7-13 when the 77's and later came out, like those more.. as it's what they grew up with.. some look at the car, some drive them.. fact is only the rs from the 70.5-73 look good.. the others look tame.. but that's my opinion.. I'll take a poncho thanks..
09-29-2014 07:54 PM
Dragonoake I remember, in the late-70's, when some commentator made comment that the new cop cars "couldn't catch a fat kid on a bike"
09-29-2014 06:30 PM
1971BB427
Quote:
Originally Posted by gearheadslife View Post
only because it's older and there are less of them left..
You really believe that's the only reason they're more popular and worth more? Don't be ridiculous. They're a much nicer looking style, and people hate all the plastic that is on later 2nd gen Camaros.
09-29-2014 05:07 PM
gearheadslife
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1971BB427 View Post
Yes, and sells for many times more money than the post 73 models.
only because it's older and there are less of them left..
09-29-2014 04:42 PM
1971BB427
Quote:
Originally Posted by mud.man.rj View Post
But the 70 1/2 -73 is the most popular today out of the two.
Yes, and sells for many times more money than the post 73 models.
09-29-2014 03:45 PM
mud.man.rj
Camaro.

But the 70 1/2 -73 is the most popular today out of the two.
09-29-2014 01:16 PM
gearheadslife [quote=1971BB427;2646962]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kwik View Post
I would call it a sporty car. When the new '77 Z/28 was developed it was done as a handling car, where the latest 350 motor complemented the package, the motor wasn't central to the car's performance like it was in the pre '72 era.
/QUOTE]

I'd call the post '73 Camaro effort by Chevrolet, "lazy". They took a beautiful car design, and simply cluttered them with either big ugly energy absorbing bumpers, or plastic covered bumpers. It was an attempt to delay designing a new body style, and take the original 1970 body and extend it's life through 1981. The result was an ugly eye sore, when comparing them to the early 2nd gen Camaro body, and bumpers.
It always looked to me like the designers at Chevrolet were either sitting around working on something else, or too lazy to come up with a new body style that would turn heads.
funny the 79-81 sold
better than your "loved" 70 1/2 to 73
09-27-2014 10:11 PM
mud.man.rj
old folks

Yes even cars like Corvette's were lame, sad then but today they try to mix in old with new, good old nostalgia to keep us happy, good thing performance is back...finally and w warranty. Nothing like the 70's and back, classic lines that last forever.
This thread has more than 15 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright Hotrodders.com 1999 - 2012. All Rights Reserved.