|08-12-2012 04:05 PM|
|stallion0606||Maybe some muddin here and there|
|08-12-2012 03:31 PM|
|stallion0606||no I didnt know about no adds on the forum, but thank you|
|08-12-2012 03:30 PM|
|stallion0606||I used to race it in the mudd, but that is over. now its just for offroading purposes only or weekend beast. Rockcrawling and what ever I can find to climb. I havnt taken it apart yet and looked inside or did any measurements, sooo I am probably going to check it out and see.|
|08-08-2012 03:07 PM|
|lg1969||Take that 283 put it in a vega. You will get the power and MPG. Or better yet, Build a Rat Rod|
|08-07-2012 09:49 PM|
|vinniekq2||I have 2x 283s I picked up for $50.I think I will look for an old chevy2 or like the other poster said (blyndgesser) some light weight car.My plan is to make about 360 HP.The 283 has very little torque so she will get some gears.I wouldnt go so far as to say I will use an RV cam though.so far its just a whim,,,looking for heads that will flow enough air and fit|
|08-07-2012 03:12 PM|
|327NUT||Now you know you can't run add's in the forum....don't you? Try the classifed section.|
|08-07-2012 02:55 PM|
|stallion0606||ok than i have a 283 sbc for sale 300.00 oir best offer.|
|07-07-2012 06:02 AM|
Personally, I'd consider anything smaller than a 350 SBC incompatible w/a 4WD full sized vehicle (Chevy Blazer/C-10 truck, etc.). A 305 might squeak by, but that's the absolute bottom line. Now, if you had an import/LUV/Ranger/S10 all stripped down (meaning light weight) you might do OK w/a 283. But any place a 283 fits, a 350 fits....
|07-07-2012 01:30 AM|
is it possible to make enough horse power to run it in a 4x4
|06-11-2012 07:50 PM|
As mentioned, if the heads haven't been rebuilt to run unleaded fuel, then they need all SS valves, and hardened seats. My local guy charges $300 to redo them, and at the same time he'll make the intakes 1.94" for a 283, or 2.02" for larger SBC with 4" bore.
I just got a pair of old 2,02 camel hump heads from him, and I just welded up a bracket to make my alternator mount on the front two header bolts, and adjusting arm off the water pump.
|06-11-2012 07:36 PM|
|swvalcon||305 heads make a good update for a 283. A lot cheaper than setting up 283 heads for unleaded gas and they have all the holes.|
|06-11-2012 06:47 PM|
|stallion0606||i mostly deal with off road vehicles, but i do have an 85 trans am. now apparently the heads are not drilled or threaded might be a problem. now what can i do to it for a 4x4.|
|06-10-2012 09:14 PM|
There were a lot of full sized Impalas with 283 engines and they ran very well. Don't underestimate the 283 for power. The 283 power pack engine was rated 220 hp, and the Corvette version with fuel injection was rated 283 HP.
I built a 283 for my '55 Chevy that ran 1.84 fueler heads and a dual quad intake with twin 400 AFB's and it dyno'd at over 350 hp with stock bore and stroke. It also wound 6,500 with ease.
I would tend to not want a high winding engine in a 4x4, but for most anything else the 283 will serve you well if properly assembled and the right tranny and rearend behind it.
|06-10-2012 11:17 AM|
|sstock||Put a bored 283 in my T bucket, this thing definitely does not need more motor, pretty stout. Keep the small 283 out of the heavier vehicles though as said, anything more than say early nova size is too big, IMHO|
|06-10-2012 08:45 AM|
|blyndgesser||That's a good suggestion, vpd. Keep it light and you'll be pleased with the results.|
|This thread has more than 15 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.|