Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board - Reply to Topic
Hotrodders.com -- Hot Rod Forum



Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Unanswered Posts Auto Escrow Insurance Auto Loans
Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board > Tech Help> Engine> Aluminum Heads for Mild 327?
User Name
Password
lost password?   |   register now

Thread: Aluminum Heads for Mild 327? Reply to Thread
Title:
  
Message:
Trackback:
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name (usually not your first and last name), your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Topic Review (Newest First)
04-04-2013 08:41 PM
1Gary Clean looking build.Nice job.
04-04-2013 08:24 PM
sscamaro_510
Quote:
Originally Posted by techinspector1 View Post
You know, sometimes you just hit a sweet spot and the OP has done just that with this combination. This little motor makes some very pretty hp and torque curves. Any of you guys who want a 327 that will pull away strongly from a stop and still haul the mail at the top, should emulate this combination. I used the flow numbers from the Stan Weiss site to run this Sim.....Dynamic Compression Ratio of this combo is 8.428:1.

RPM HP TORQUE
2000 138 363
2500 177 371
3000 226 395
3500 280 421
4000 331 433
4500 375 435
5000 407 428
5500 425 406
6000 415 364

Peak volumetric efficiency 92.7% @5000
Peak BMEP 198.7 lbs @4500
Maximize the combo by retarding the cam 4 degrees and pick up 9 hp and 4 ft/lbs of torque. 650 is just the right amount of carburetor.
Good job SSCamaro_510.
Man,those numbers are impressive! I'm not a drag racer by any means,I just wanted a small cube motor for semi-daily use to run on pump gas. Looks like I'll be going with the 3.42 gears instead. I can't wait 'til I'm back on the road in a couple Weeks. Thanks for that dyno Sim Techinspector.


04-04-2013 04:58 PM
vinniekq2 techs post confirms what we all agree on
04-04-2013 04:30 PM
techinspector1 You know, sometimes you just hit a sweet spot and the OP has done just that with this combination. This little motor makes some very pretty hp and torque curves. Any of you guys who want a 327 that will pull away strongly from a stop and still haul the mail at the top, should emulate this combination. I used the flow numbers from the Stan Weiss site to run this Sim.....Dynamic Compression Ratio of this combo is 8.428:1.

RPM HP TORQUE
2000 138 363
2500 177 371
3000 226 395
3500 280 421
4000 331 433
4500 375 435
5000 407 428
5500 425 406
6000 415 364

Peak volumetric efficiency 92.7% @5000
Peak BMEP 198.7 lbs @4500
Maximize the combo by retarding the cam 4 degrees and pick up 9 hp and 4 ft/lbs of torque. 650 is just the right amount of carburetor.
Good job SSCamaro_510.
04-04-2013 12:25 PM
1Gary Well we are alot like everyone else in one sense.Pretty good at spending other people's money.LOL!!.
04-04-2013 11:31 AM
vinniekq2
327

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1Gary View Post
To be honest when I skimmed over this thread and saw 327 and aluminum heads the first thought that enter my mind was lean on the compression,build a RPM capable bottom end,cam it to buzz to the moon with heads accordingly to breath.Remember the Camaro's are heavy cars that need that to move them.
I would like to have seen one size bigger cam and a solid roller.That would make a lot more power
04-04-2013 11:27 AM
1Gary To be honest when I skimmed over this thread and saw 327 and aluminum heads the first thought that enter my mind was lean on the compression,build a RPM capable bottom end,cam it to buzz to the moon with heads accordingly to breath.Remember the Camaro's are heavy cars that need that to move them.
04-04-2013 05:02 AM
cdminter59
Aluminum Heads for Mild 327?

What happened to the Edelbrock Performer Rpm heads? If I was building a 327 ci My choice would be the Edelbrock Performer Rpm heads with the matching Edelbrock Performer Rpm intake maniflod. I have read where people are having too many problems with the air gap manifold. You can do a comparison here on Hot Rodders forum between the Performer RPM and the Performer RPM Air Gap. On the rear gears I would go with 342's or 355's. That 327 needs to get the rpms up quick. Most people use 373's for the street and with OD transmission use 4:11 or 4:56. Good Luck, nice Camaro. It looks like a copy of my 67 RS/SS Camaro. 491 ci, TH400, 12 bolt 4:11 rear, Caltracs and frame connectors too. Front suspension replaced with Global West upper and lower control arms. Unisteer manual Rack and pinion also.
04-03-2013 06:56 PM
vinniekq2 I see the HP at 390 ish,torque? maybe 375 plus? 6k maximum RPM for power
how does it go?
04-03-2013 06:35 PM
sscamaro_510 Well after many months the car is almost together,another couple Weeks...can't wait!

This is what I ended up going with:
327 bored .030
9:6:1 Compression
Balanced
Edelbrock E-tec 170cc heads.
Edelbrock RPM Air-Gap
Stock crank and rods
MSD Ready to run HEI Distributor
MSD Wires
Comp XR270HR Hydraulic Roller Cam
Comp Valve Train
1.5 Roller Rockers
Holley #4150 650cfm Vacuum Secondaries
1 5/8 Headers
2 1/2 Dual exhaust into flowmasters

Gonna put a TH-350 and 3.36 rear gears behind it...what kind of HP/TQ am I looking at with this combo?
08-26-2012 01:20 PM
sscamaro_510
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdminter59 View Post
Relax, the Lunati roller cam make way better power than those two hydraulic cams. I don't see what these guys are gettin excited about those number are not exact but a guide. The dyno sim doesn't have flow numbers from your heads,exact rear gear ratio, etc.
You're right,I think that's the cam I'm gonna go with. Should have plenty of power to dust the occasional Mustang lol.
08-26-2012 12:36 PM
vinniekq2 cd,I agree with you,the roller would make more power.better duration for a 327 and more lift.The power would increase everywhere,including the bottom end. A bigger cam does not "always" mean a loss of low rpm torque. neutron meters and kilowatts are different ways of expressing something that humans can kind of understand.
and thanks for reiterating that a wider power band is required to match transmission ratios.
I no longer have a desire to argue here. 327s make power at higher rpms than 350s.putting a smaller cam in a smaller engine is not entirely accurate for rpms. duration is time,lift is flow,o
08-26-2012 11:49 AM
cdminter59
Cams

Quote:
Originally Posted by sscamaro_510 View Post
Relax, the Lunati roller cam make way better power than those two hydraulic cams. I don't see what these guys are gettin excited about those number are not exact but a guide. The dyno sim doesn't have flow numbers from your heads,exact rear gear ratio, etc.
08-26-2012 11:23 AM
ap72
Quote:
Originally Posted by vinniekq2 View Post
ap72,please learn the rule of 5252.


In terms I understand though not technical,the peak hp being 2 or more k higher than peak tq rpm will usually indicate higher hp numbers than torque.when you reach 5252 rpm,that is usually the x over spot,or it should have happened by then.There is hp being left on the table somewhere???

a 5500 rpm 327 though perky is no where near what it should do. a 1500 rpm range is too narrow for idael acceleration.In a perfect world you shift at max hp and the transmission drops the rpm to max torque rpm.not many transmissions drop 1500 rpms between shifts.
I wont post a detailed explanation like Bogie,that guy does a much better job of explaining the details
Again, there is absolutely no good information in any of this, BUT it does come from a long line of misunderstood BS, so it is understandable how a person may come to believe it carries some merit.

hp and tq always cross at 5252, there is no significance of that number though other than how hp and torque are defined, switch to metric readings and 5252 carries no significance.

To a certain point running a larger cam will produce more hp and it will produce it at a higher RPM... which means that if you don't ever run in that RPM the "increase in power" will actually make your car slower as it results in a loss of power in a lower RPM. Which is why you need to compare power output at the same specified rpm to get a better comparison.

For a perfect shift on a race track you do NOT shift at peak hp down to peak tq, you shift to maximize your average hp, meaning you shift past peak hp and fall to a place right below peak hp (how far in each direction depends on your power curve).

A 5500 rpm 327 maybe exactly what is needed depending on the application. If you run 50hp less than a more aggressively built 327 but are never in the rpm range it makes the additional power the engine with less power can actually make your car run a little faster.
08-26-2012 10:29 AM
sscamaro_510 I keep coming back to these two also:
Street Master Cam - Chevrolet Small Block 276/286 - Lunati Power
Voodoo Hyd Cam - Chevrolet Small Block 268/276 - Lunati Power

Would those make more power?
This thread has more than 15 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright Hotrodders.com 1999 - 2012. All Rights Reserved.