|10-05-2012 02:11 PM|
|vinniekq2||make a new thread just for yourself. ask why a big bore makes better/more power,ask about light weight rotating parts and short stroke Vs long stroke and slow throttle response,state N/A or boosted and get a bunch of answers that apply to your application. a 7 year old thread is not a good place to start|
|10-05-2012 01:30 PM|
Such a good argument...!
OK GURUS, HERE WE GO...
I WANT TO BUILD A QUICK "WINDING" MOTOR, MAXING OUT @ 62-6500 RPM I DONT WANT TO SPEND HUGE MONEY... AND I DONT WANT TO GO 140 MPH!
IM THINKING 377 (BIG BORE/SHORT STROKE)
AM BUILDING A 31 MODEL A ROD FOR STREET USE... TREMEC 5 SP, JAGUAR REAR W 3:70-ISH RATIO, 32INCH TALL CHEATER SLICKS.
THE WHOLE RIG SHOULD WEIGH LESS THAN 2000 #
NOW HERES THE KICKER, THE CAR CAME W A 671 ROOTS BLOWER AND 2 FOURS. SO IM PRESUMING THAT WILL MAKE UP FOR ANY LOW END TORQUE PROBLEMS.
I HAVENT BOUGHT HEADS YET BUT HAVE A NICE COMP ROLLER CAM THAT LIVES @ 2000-6500 RPM...
AM THINKING SOME SEMI MILD ALUM HEADS THAT WILL FLOW @ THESE RPM RANGES.
DO YA SEE ANY HOLES IN MY PLAN SO FAR??
|06-11-2008 04:36 PM|
Buddy shop owner down the road runs a 377 in his camaro. No joke. It flat out rips with 1/4 mi times high 9's all motor. RPM KILLS, so keep that in mind. I personally like the 3.875 combo, always made plenty of TQ/HP for me, no matter. You can get a 3.48 stroke crank with the 400 main size and LJ or SJ rod, whatever you want. You need to come up with a specific goal for this motor, figure out how much track time and how much street time and go from there. Gears tire size trans weight heads cam intake etc etc etc. I'm looking at 10 400 mained 4340 cranks with strokes from 3.3, 3.35, 3.4, 3.48, 3.5, 3.562, 3.625 and 3.875 available for 5.7 or 6.0 rods. You can build your 400 beast into a variety of c.i. with more head options than you'll care to look at too. It's all in the COMBO, and it all works together... when you get it right. JMO One more thing you might consider, that being how much HP you make in the stock block. I've seen them over 700HP on motor but that's a crap shoot not to grenade. I've run them with 500+ and hit 'em with a 150-200 shot without trouble. All I'm going to add is to run it with a solid flat cam so it makes some noise.
|06-11-2008 04:13 PM|
|Double_v23||I would expect you to split that block in half about halfway down the track the second time you launch it. The stock 400's were not very strong and the 4 bolts were the weaker of the castings. Ask CNC Block N/E what he thinks of the 4 bolt 400's and he will show you some pics where guys tore the mains right out of them. And they weren't doing the RPM's that you are planning to pull.|
|06-11-2008 03:43 PM|
|06-06-2008 06:21 PM|
Has anyone else actually run this motor? I have been thinking about it and would like to hear from more people with more experience with it. The car is a 68 firebird that is getting an M-21, and a 9-inch in the next month or so after I finish gathering parts.
My goal for the car is for it to run a solid 12 second quarter mile and more importantly all around fun to drive. I also want to use (with the exception of safety items) parts that were available in the seventies where possible, my Dad has a set of camel humps he is giving me, how would these be on this motor? This is not a DD and is only driven when I want to, and I am used the quirks of a modified vehicle. I am thinking a nice fast spinning small block would be well suited to this goal. So please let me know if I am in line here.
|06-06-2008 03:52 PM|
What kind of a block are you using, you are spending alot of money on internals, I would hope you would get an aftermarket block to hold it all together.
|06-06-2008 03:50 PM|
|Double_v23||I don't pretend to know alot about Cams, but I think that cam is going to only be good from 4500-8000 rpm. If you plan on doing anything but full throttle driving then you will want to go another way.|
|06-06-2008 03:39 PM|
406 cam info
Thanks for the reply, we are still gathering parts for the 406 and picked up a roller cam from a friend. You mentioned the 7500 range. Here are some specs from the cam card. Comp Cam 12-000-9, 106 LS, 306 IN/310 EX @ .020, 273 IN/277 EX @ .050. What do you think this would do for the RPM range?
|06-04-2008 08:44 PM|
|lapersinger||7500rpm wouldbe my guess.|
|05-15-2008 11:33 PM|
First post on engine forum.
Hey guys, since we are talking about 400's. I am building a 406 sbc with a Scat lightweight 3.75" stroke crank which requires a 6" rod to clear the pistons. Using World 235 series alum. roller heads with oversized valves, a 0.700+ lift cam, and JE high domes. Don't plan on running NOS right away. With these little bits of engine info, what RPM range do you think this mill can be pushed to?
|05-15-2008 12:29 AM|
that's probably a result of excessive tire spin... getting better times with less power usually means there's a problem somewhere in the suspension or tires.
|05-14-2008 11:28 PM|
|11-25-2007 11:31 AM|
I think that building an effective high RPM package is more technical and complicated than a high torque machine, but make no mistake, it works!
Gobs of torque is kind of a one size fits all proposition, effective in most all applications. One thing that is rarley mentioned in these threads is the fact that gear reduction = torque!!
In a high reving package everything needs to be done right and made to work together. ALL of the engine parts and its composition as well as the rest of the car.. The whole idea is based on the principle that the HP "rate of gain" grows as the RPM's escalate and so they need to operate in a higher band. Pro stock cars are an excellent example of this principle, the amount of technology that goes into one of those motors alone is staggering, to say nothing of the rest of the car. They are able to run at speeds that are almost unnatural for carbureted engines because of their unprecedented utilization of RPM's.
Weight to HP ratio is also another very important factor with a high RPM street rod.
|11-24-2007 05:22 PM|
|chrismac||I would personally build a 406 with 6 inch rods, more bearing clearance and forged internals with the pistons having mm style rings total sealed to turn up the heat all the way around. most tq at the bottom and most hp at the top end with the right cam and heads like pro topline 235s or big afr heads around 650 lift and 262 @.050 with a 1.6 rocker.|
|This thread has more than 15 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.|