|10-29-2012 01:47 PM|
|10-29-2012 08:40 AM|
Overlap can also cause reversion at low rpm along w/a loss of vacuum. This contributes greatly to the 'lope' of a performance cam- which is really nothing more than the engine running like crap at low rpm.
As it is, cam companies have been stretching the envelope for a long time. It's only because of advances including CAD/CAM and in metallurgy that we can get away w/cams as intense as the Comp XE series.
Personally I'd like it if a cam could be ground w/o any lope and retain 20 in/Hg vacuum while retaining all the lift, duration and overlap needed for high rpm efficiency. But because of the limits on materials, valve spring pressure, lobe intensity, etc. this can't happen. Not talking about variable lift/duration/timing valvetrains here- I want a magical cam w/square lobes w/o needing any bells and whistles!
|10-29-2012 02:33 AM|
Engine sbc combination
Don, I checked on Comp Cams website where they have CamQuest a camshaft selection software with dyno results. I used United Engine & Machine (Keith Black) COMPRESSION RATIO CALCULATOR Static and Dynamic Compression Ratio
(Considers Cam Timing and Rod Ratio). I used the 75cc chamber from the AFR 195 heads and SRP flattop pistons with a piston head volume of +5. (#1) 299THR7 PN 12-602-8, 2500-6200, .569/.554 lift, 243/257 duration @ .050, LSA 107, ICL 102, CR 9.895, DCR 8.341, 359hp@5500 rpms, 369 lbs torque@4500 rpms. (#2) 12-443-8 XR294HR, 2800-6100, .540/.562 lift, 242/248 duration @ .050, LSA 110, ICL 106, CR 9.895, DCR 8.118, 390hp@5500 rpms, 413 lbs torque @ 4000 rpms. (#3) 12-433-8 XR288HR, 2500-6000, .520/.540 lift, 236/242 duration@ .050, LSA 110 ICL 106, CR 9.895, DCR 8.287, 394hp@5500 rpms, 426 lbs torque @ 4000 rpms. Send the thumpr back and swap for 12-433-8 XR288HR.
|10-28-2012 10:48 PM|
There is little or no cylinder pressure at overlap. The piston is coming up to TDC on the exhaust stroke and has evacuated the cylinder of exhaust gases from the previous power stroke. The intake valve is just beginning to open. So, we have two valves open and cannot possibly have any cylinder pressure.
Cylinder pressure is determined by the static compression ratio of the motor combined with the intake valve closing point after bottom dead center.
|10-28-2012 07:26 PM|
I have the info....first hand. I have 388 with Etec 200 heads and ran on a chassis dyno. Round 1 is a big m/thumper and round 2 was an Edelbrock 2201 . Round one on the chassis dyno ran 347 ponies and 379 twist.
Round 2 came in at 380 ponies and 397 twist. All else was the same, except for a little change in tuning to match each came. The 2201, rather old school cam, gained 33 ponies and nearly 20 lb/ft, and at about 800 rpm lower than the Thu per. Also, much easier to tune and excellent street manners. Also, it idles nicely at 850 rpm. This is no dyno sim. These are real numbers.
|10-28-2012 06:19 PM|
|wwilliams181||I honestly think you will be fine with this cam. The problem most are talking about is that the Rpm range is narrowed and the loss of cylinder pressure due to the added overlap. That cam already has 5 deg. built in. I would install it straight up which would be an intake centerline of 102. If you ar a little high on compression.. this cam will work to your advantage when using pump gas. The upside to the sound is the throttle response. The head choice you are looking at will be fine. If you havent bought pistons yet.. i would tell you that this is one place you should spend your money.. i buy almost the lightest thing i can get. You will really gain here.|
|10-28-2012 05:57 PM|
|RONNYinWAXHAW||Thank goodness for these posts. I searched "SBC Thumper Cam" and read all the responses in those posts. There was a lot of good info there. I too am considering a 383 in a one-piece rear seal block. I was going to use flat top hypereutectic pistons with the coated skirt and stock rods in a daily driven pick-up (in my project journal). I was looking into a set of heads with 180cc intake runners and 2.02/1.60 valves with 64cc chambers. This block is set up for a roller cam (bosses for the spider in the valley, cam retainer drilled and tapped) so I was looking at the Extreme Energy hydraulic roller that specs: 270/276 .495/.502 with the powerband being 1600-5400 rpm. I plan roller rockers, RPM Air-Gap intake and the carb is undetermined. A 2000 lock-up convertor in a 700R4 and 3.42 or 3.73 rear gears. Any suggestions?|
|05-31-2010 07:54 PM|
|05-29-2010 02:38 AM|
|05-28-2010 03:43 PM|
I have seen on another board where engine builder Joe Sherman(maybe you know the name?, won the first Jeg's Engine Masters contest) has good results with the two biggest Thumpr cams in 383-406 street builds but doesn't recommend any of the smaller ones. IIRC seems like he is installing them 6-7° advanced.
You might try looking for his posts over at www.speedtalk.com in the engine forum, his handle is bigjoe1
|05-28-2010 02:52 PM|
|don77camaro||I really want to see some actual dyno runs for the thumper cam with adv. duration of 299|
|05-28-2010 02:50 PM|
|don77camaro||Hey im going to run the thumpr cam,and im going to degree it ,and run the recommended parts,and i have a friend at bb&t racing who has a engine dyno,and im going to do a swap and see the difference of horsepwer, im going to see if an extreme energy roller will make more than this cam, or if any one knows of a cam with close to same lift on intake and exhaust that would like to see which would do better. The heads are afr 195cc|
|05-28-2010 08:02 AM|
|cobalt327||It occurred to me that if you get ahold of the company who sold it to you, you may be able to just tell the deliverer to return it to the sender when it comes, if you or someone will be there. I would check w/them and see.|
|05-28-2010 07:56 AM|
That said, all is not lost!
Depending on who you ordered it from, get on the blower to them and just tell them that you want to return the unused, unopened cam for an exchange on another different cam. Likely, they will give you a return authorization or something like that along with instructions on how to return it for credit/exchange/refund.
I know of no reputable dealer who wouldn't accept a return- you'll only have to eat the shipping charges but that's a better alternative to using a cam that's not what you want.
|05-28-2010 07:43 AM|
Its already shipped please read
The cam already shipped. I know you guys know whats good and whats not. I read on these post and the replies are crazy. This site has alot of intelligent people for sure, and i know you can help me understand. I don't care about the sound i care about performance, and it had good lift,and the rpm looked to be where i would want it. Is it the exhaust overlap that hurts it,and if so wouldn't it only decrees power at low rpm. I just got back into building engines. I was spending time boxing, and I didn't know the cam was just for sound, i would have never bought it,and i have kids,and not alot of money so when i get extra money i want it to be on quality parts not some cam that makes your car sound stronger than it is, i could care less about sound performance is important to me, please let me know what the problem is with the cam
|This thread has more than 15 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.|