Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board - Reply to Topic -- Hot Rod Forum

Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Unanswered Posts Auto Escrow Insurance Auto Loans
Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board > Tech Help> Engine> pontiac edelbrock rpm peformers
User Name
lost password?   |   register now

Thread: pontiac edelbrock rpm peformers Reply to Thread
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name (usually not your first and last name), your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:
Please select your insurance company (Optional)


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Topic Review (Newest First)
03-10-2013 09:24 AM
Mr. P-Body That calculates to just over 9:1. Will run well on 89, probably just fine on 87. The round port head has the "old fashioned" Edelbrock chamber. It "likes" more timing than the stock heads. 38 "total" isn't uncommon. Unfortunately, the valve placement isn't much better than the factory large-valve heads, and the small bore will inhibit flow (shrouded intake valve). Lift should be kept under .550". There's a good chance for valve-to-block interference too, so be careful.

In the light car, this thing should catch revs very quickly. You may have found the one application where the 350 Pontiac can give 350 Chevy a problem. With the flow of an "out of the box" E-head, the little engine can see 7,000 RPM easily. A solid roller and all the trimmings would make it a very potent Poncho... But always remember, the 350 has the same "issues" as 400 and larger. The connecting rods... The smaller bore does nothing for the rod bearing and cast rod...

PM me and I'll make a cam recommendation.

03-10-2013 06:05 AM
69 widetrack I'm a huge Pontiac fan and thank you for calling it a 354...just like Mr. P-Body said, they didn't want to piss off their GM counter parts by having a bigger little motor than they had is probably why Pontiac went to a 326 so they wouldn't step on any 327 toes. Very cool build, love those Pontiacs.

03-09-2013 03:29 PM
killeratrod wow , that is a nice ride. Great job on the build.
03-07-2013 06:23 PM
h0trod thank you all for replying!

Originally Posted by Mr. P-Body View Post
Well, it certainly IS different... (:- Interesting refering to the engine as "354".

From looking at the pics, they appear to be the "D-port" castings.

Be careful as it's real "easy" to over-cam a 350P.
Compression is important, so the chamber information is necessary.


point #1, i call an engine by the inches! im short, so i need all i can get!

point #2, look a little closer at the picture. those are casting # 77's D port cast irons!
the edelbrocks i have are supposedly 72cc round port heads. they are bolted on the engine, so i cannot measue them.

the 354 these said heads are on, i drove it around the property (in a 77 t/a)for a couple of weeks until i decided that a 13.1 was not good enough for my hotrod. TRANSPLANT TIME!
however its got some kind of valve train problem, like a sticky lifter, mabe a valve spring, i dont know yet. but it would miss like a bad dog!

im thinking its a lifter, so i want to re-cam it.

but right now im on a slim budjet, and i gotta order a scatter sheild and a throwout bearing next. then i gotta convert the hotrod from an auto..

the joys of fabrication.

good day.
03-07-2013 05:01 PM
Mr. P-Body Well, it certainly IS different... (:- Interesting refering to the engine as "354". It's true, but it's refered to as "350P" in most parts books. I think Pontiac "down-sized" the rating to not step on toes in other GM divisions by having a "bigger" little engine.

From looking at the pics, they appear to be the "D-port" castings. What is the chamber volume? I know the round-port versions well, but have yet to build the D-port. I've read they have high-swirl chambers, similar to the KRE d-ports. We've built several engines with those. Good heads.

The round-port versions have to have the pushrod holes elongated for 1.65s, so I would imagine CB327 is right, they'll need attention. Be careful as it's real "easy" to over-cam a 350P. The small bore makes the large valves a liability, not an advantage. As said, the bores NEED the chamfer, but even that isn't enough. We've learned 350s "like" the 1.96/1.66 combination, not unlike 389.

Compression is important, so the chamber information is necessary.

03-07-2013 04:25 PM
LATECH sweeeet
03-07-2013 01:38 PM
cobalt327 Good chance you'll need to open them up for 1.65 rockers.

If the block hasn't been notched at the tops of the bores to help reduce the valve shrouding, it should be done.
03-07-2013 08:27 AM
pontiac edelbrock rpm peformers

im running a set of STOCK edelbrock rpm peformers on a pontiac 354.

rockers are a stamped roller tip crane 1.52:1

i have a set of PRW's 1.65:1 full roller rockers.

do the pushrod holes need opening up?

before you ask "what the hell did you put those on a 354 for"?

i bought the engine for a grand. couldnt pass it up!

this engine is going into my 30 oldsmobile.

replacing a junkyard 389 and a stock th350

with this aluminumheaded 354+ (dont know the bore until i pull the heads)
and a st-10!

have a great day!

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999 - 2012. All Rights Reserved.