Hot Rod Forum banner

Need Help!! What Is The Best Bucket Seat For A 55 Chevy

41K views 36 replies 23 participants last post by  Pontiac_Judas 
#1 ·
Hey guys i just bought another 55 Chevy,,,it has a set of racing bucket seats in it now but i want to change them..'im not a big fan for the racing buckets' i already have a 55 with a bench seat so i want to leave some kind of bucket seat in my new 55 for a change,,, My question is what is the best style of bucket that wont look out of place and wont be to hard to get sitting straight,, im thinking 60's model seat but not for sure, what is a good make and year seat you think would look good????? thanks
 
#3 ·
If it was me...and I ain't no CHEVY freak... :D

It is the same as a 57 FORD. Only 1964 GALAXIE XL buckets and console looks good in it. The TRI-5 CHEV only looks good (to me) with the 63/64 IMPALA SS buckets (and 409 installation)... :thumbup:

(It's an old fart thing... :pain: )
 
#5 ·
A lot of people like the seats from the 1960s Impalas.

The mid-60s GTO/Lemans seats work good too. I've got a set in my other Hardtop that have been in the car for over 25 years now.

I know for a while a few guys were using bucket seats from the late 80s, early 90s Dodge Shadows and Plymouth Sundances. I thought if you removed the head rest the seats would look better in a '55/6/7 Chevy.

I've also used early Nova bucket seats in my very first car that were basically the same seats Impalas got.

The 1980s Monte Carlo seats will work too if you can find a set.
 
#6 ·
I love all that is GM. I had to say that 1st. I wish I owned a 55 Chevy. That too...
Now having said that. I've got a 54 I've been working on since last year that I started driving in April. It's got 1985 AMC Eagle seats. Mainly because it has an Amc Eagle 4x4chassis. Those seats are almost more of a split bench [an effect I increase by putting a blanket over both togather] than buckets and they "nash" or lay back as well, a trick the stock ones didn't do. Now, being as I used that chassis/floor the seats stayed bolted in the same spot...I don't know how well they would workout w/the stock trans-tunnel or if the would be high enough w/out some lifts under them, as I channeled the body very low in front.
In Febuary I bought a 53 from a guy who was broke & needed fast cash. The car had/has alot of issues. He did a "clipjob" on it using a 79 Camero for a doner...but it's seats, front & back, are out of an 80's Chryst-killer LeBaron. They are highback, in a weird gray-colored leather. The driverside one appears to have been electric. They are about an 1 or 2"s lower than I'd like them to be, but maybe it's because I'm only 5'10". They do actually look like they belong w/the car [it's flatblack] though.
 
#8 ·
Why would you want seatbelts in your hardtop, or any other 50's Chevy thats supposed to be a hotrod for that matter. Besides that last time I looked in modern piece of crap, the belt straps went to the floor & were bolted, so the seat wouldn't really even be attached to them. That was the case w/the Lebaron seats in my 53. The backseat has a couple slots where the plastic buckle-end used to go through though. Which brings me to my only reason to even bother responding to this thread again...If your using a truck seat for the front, what are going to use for the backseat?
 
#9 ·
The 90% of seats defined as All Belts to Seat systems (ABS) to not allow for forward dumps to get into that car.

Note to all wanting to do this. The only forward dump all belts to seat system that I am aware of is the Chrysler Sebring Convertables. All others if you want to get into a back seat you need to make sure you have track travel.

The other thing to Note as I have posted several times before is that ABS systems require additional floor mouting scrutiny due to the additional weight and the load path of the seat belt forces into the floor. Also be aware that Almost all ABS seats use Pyrotechnic seat belt buckle that are fired by a crash system sensor to tighten up the slack and lock the retractor rachet to make the seats work correctly.

I always say something is better than nothing but dont think they will perform like they do in the OEM application.
 
#10 ·
I'm not sure exactly how the "good seats for a 55 or 57 Chevy" thread got turned into the "seatbelts thread"...I thought this was a hotrod site, not an insurance company's.
Seat belts do not belong in any pre1960 General Motors product period. If you want safety for vehicle occupants, go buy a more modern car. You are ruining the car by adding anything to protect humans.
Either of my cars is worth more than I am, [or anyone who will own them after I'm dead for that matter] even though they are both just raw [what some are calling ratrod] project cars. If I were to damage either one by my inability to handle road conditions and/or traffic than I surely would deserve to die, rather than survive, having destroyed a work of art....Good captains go down w/their ship...Cowards fear for their own safety over their ships.
 
#11 ·
rj57 said:
A lot of people like the seats from the 1960s Impalas.

The mid-60s GTO/Lemans seats work good too. I've got a set in my other Hardtop that have been in the car for over 25 years now.

I know for a while a few guys were using bucket seats from the late 80s, early 90s Dodge Shadows and Plymouth Sundances. I thought if you removed the head rest the seats would look better in a '55/6/7 Chevy.

I've also used early Nova bucket seats in my very first car that were basically the same seats Impalas got.

The 1980s Monte Carlo seats will work too if you can find a set.
I think this dude has the most correct Idea...Keeping it GM, if you can would be sorta cool. 60's [or 70's], seats would be great, but might be hard to find, in good shape & still affordable.

I'll bet mid-80's 2dr GM cars would be; priced decent, available, probably still not to thrashed [in some cars anyway],and [my big hang-up] the backseat might just workout too. Having front & back seats that match is nice.

If it's buckets rather than a split-bench, you might want to get the center console too.
 
#12 · (Edited)
dingodong said:
I'm not sure exactly how the "good seats for a 55 or 57 Chevy" thread got turned into the "seatbelts thread"...I thought this was a hotrod site, not an insurance company's.
Seat belts do not belong in any pre1960 General Motors product period. If you want safety for vehicle occupants, go buy a more modern car. You are ruining the car by adding anything to protect humans.
Either of my cars is worth more than I am, [or anyone who will own them after I'm dead for that matter] even though they are both just raw [what some are calling ratrod] project cars. If I were to damage either one by my inability to handle road conditions and/or traffic than I surely would deserve to die, rather than survive, having destroyed a work of art....Good captains go down w/their ship...Cowards fear for their own safety over their ships.
Welcome to the board and welcome to your opinion. Captains are also responsible for the safety of the passengers, crew and enviroment.

The seat belts were from a later part of the discussion thread. That is why they were mentioned. It seems the seat belts are a plus that Jim57 of the thread was talking about and he may not have known there may be a loaded shot gun shell in the buckle. Its not an insurance issue its a personal safety issue when working on the seat as well as an operational expectation issue.

Your idea of whats good or bad are purely your own and that is what this site is about.
 
#13 ·
Seat Belts

My 57 Belair has Corvette suspension,steering and brakes from a C4 and the engine is LS2 at 450 HP. When I go into a hard left turn I do not want to end up on the passenger side. My solution is bucket seats with seat belts. It is extremely difficult to maintain control of investment from the wrong side of the car. Yes the Chevy pickup seats do tilt forward.
Jim
 

Attachments

#14 · (Edited)
hello guys
thanks for all your opinions it mean alot in making the best choice to make my car look good.... in my case i do need seat belt since my car will be running low 11's at the track... im not a big fan of seat belts my self but to race a car you have to have them... so im really thinking 60's model seats are going to be the best for me.... :thumbup:
 
#15 ·
creativeinteriors said:
Welcome to the board and welcome to your opinion. Captains are also responsible for the safety of the passengers, crew and enviroment.

The seat belts were from a later part of the discussion thread. That is why they were mentioned. It seems the seat belts are a plus that Jim57 of the thread was talking about and he may not have known there may be a loaded shot gun shell in the buckle. Its not an insurance issue its a personal safety issue when working on the seat as well as an operational expectation issue.

Your idea of whats good or bad are purely your own and that is what this site is about.
I agree...Improperly used modern seatbelts are actually MORE dangerous than none at all in a 50's GM car [see metal dash...see metal dash smash face]and even non-active 60's-style lapbelts or 70's-style 2point are going to have to be floor bolted, through to a crossmember, to be anything less than a slingshot, for launching the driver through the glass. In the case of a hardtop [no posts]you might as well call any belts, "straps for holding in the decapitated corpse", if you ever go upside down. These cars were not made for safety. DO NOT PUT YOUR KIDS [or anyone else you care about] IN THEM. They become even less safe after; chopping,lowering,bending this, removing that, & altering whatnot. When I was a kid that was what it was all about...Having a "death-trap" that my parents generation deemed unsafe...a.k.a. a HOTROD. If safety is going to be a concern to a driver I recommend they stick w/a modern, airbag equipped, unaltered, car, and not try & pretend to have a hotrod.
Above all if your going to drive like a moron, so as to need safety for yourself, then do the world a favor & sell your classic American car to someone who can respect the value of the vehicle, and go get yourself a jap tuner-toilet [they come w/idiot straps already installed!] to crash up! Not a matter of what I think is good or bad, just how things were & are.
It was supposed to be a seat thread...If whoever is still looking I've got a hay bale & a couple of milk crates I'll give you for free.
 
#16 ·
INTERESTING!

First off YES no 40, 50, or 60 year old car is going to be considered "Safe" by today's standards. Too many things have happened to automotive industry since any of these now "Old" cars were sold new.

Something that does seem forgotten here is the fact these "Old" cars have a lot more metal to them then your adverage run of the mill, reynolds wrap cars/trucks of today which are 90% PLASTIC!

Do we need more safety features on a plastic car? Well........ I'd have to vote "YES!"

(let's not even go to "these cars are dinosaurs. these land yaghts need to be scraped and none get as good as gas mileage as todays cars.") If you think I'm joking about this do your own comparison. A '57 Chevy is NOT as large as some of today's SUVs or duelly quad cab pickups. Do those get good gas mileage?

Okay back to the point. (now what was it?)
Seat belts in a Classic car.
You can buy new belts from several vendors these days and install them yourself. They do need mounted through the floor pan and some type of stiffening done at this spot like using a large flat washer on the underside of the floor pan.

I do know of a guy who put seats from a Cadillac in his '55 Chevy and they do have the shoulder belt incorporated in the seat. So no anchoring of the should belt is needed.

PS. sorry for hijacking the thread.

:D
 
#17 ·
The fact that pre1960's cars are all metal is of course their double edged sword...in some ways safer, unless you get your face smacked on the dash, then you will wish you were in a muscle era car w/padded dash & shoulderbelts. They are in some ways more crush resistant...50's ones anyway, Some would argue that it isn't a hotrod, if it's "that new" [& classic car is maybe the better term even if modified]true hotrods being preww2 cars w/exposed larger motors, swapped from different cars. To me, [my definition of a hotrod] it has to have 3 things; #1 vintage. must be premuscle car era...muscle cars are not hotrods...They infact ruined hotrodding. #2 must be modified. If you restore a old car to anywhere near stock, that is the opposite of making a hotrod. #3 Must be dangerous. I'm not joking. Thats why the image problem going back to the 50's. These cars are SUPPOSED to be unsafe. Hotrodding means removing so called safety equipment, not adding it.
If I wanted safety I'd go chat it up on the Volvo site.
So my I stand by my opinion...If you want seatbelts go buy a car made after 1960 [in GM'S case] but don't go and ruin a classic that can be beautiful restored to stock or modified into a hotrod.
I am now done w/this thread [and anyone putting seatbelts in anything that didn't originally come w/them] & won't respond to it again, even if Chip Carlson & Boyd Foose, both get on here & talk about how they like a benchseat so they can sit close togather & hold hands!
 
#18 ·
hello again.....guys in my car the seat belt are mounted to the floor, reason being its got a set of racing buckets in it now.... what ever kind of seat i go with i can still use my floor mounted seat belts..... i just want a nice looking and comfy seat that will fit the car and not look hacked.... like i said before it would be nice find a seat that i wont have to do alot of modification's to get the right seat height/ that way they dont seat too low or 2 high u know..... i hate hacked up cars!!!!! really i should put a factory bench seat back in the car but like i said before my other car has a bench in it so i want to be different... thanks for the info
 
#21 ·
I am using seats out of a 92 honda prelude for my 77 nova. these seats flip forward for back seaters and you would be able to get the buckets and the back seat to match. The only part of the seat belt that is on these seats is the buckle which is easily removed. since i have a 77 i plan to remove these and put my originals on. I didnt want to put honda seats in a chevy either but they were the color i want in like new shape and i got them for $100 for the pair. All it took to put them in is some fabricting and welding to make new floor mounts from the bench that was originally in there. I know honda isnt the best thing to put in a chevy but thay are very comfortable have some style and they wrap around your body nicely. This is probably not for every one but i am happy with my choice and thought i would give mt input.
 
#22 ·
The Honda and Toyota seats are outstanding. It's your vehicle, put whatever seat in it you like. If you're happy with them, that's all that should matter.
 
#23 ·
If any of you are old enough to remember funerals from the 50's and 60's, many were due to being ejected from the car, usually a rollover or hitting something hard enough to go through the windsheild.

I will always find a way to get some kind of restraint to keep me in the car. Sure it could be on fire or roll into a lake and I might be out cold. These were the old agrguments for not wearing a seat belt.

My 56 post has basic belts bolted in, if the next owner wants them out, weld up the holes and carry on. My race cars have 5 point, probably should change to 6 point, would not go on the track without them. I've been lucky but have seen a few big wrecks from the driver's seat. ;)
 
#26 ·
I'm building a 55.5 Chevy truckrod for my son, and am planning to install a 4-point cage and seat belts for his protection in the event of a crash/rollover. Why are seat belts a bad idea...as mentioned in a few of the replies?

If they are NOT a bad idea, should I attach them to the seat? Or to the cage? Or???

Thanks in advance.

Antny
 
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top