Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board - Reply to Topic -- Hot Rod Forum

Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Unanswered Posts Auto Escrow Insurance Auto Loans
Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board > Tech Help> Engine> Realistic Hp question
User Name
lost password?   |   register now

Thread: Realistic Hp question Reply to Thread
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name (usually not your first and last name), your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:
Please select your insurance company (Optional)


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Topic Review (Newest First)
09-12-2007 12:59 PM
Johnny4311 ive known of 383's lasting 10 years + i dont care anything about hydrualic camshaft really, ive run solid flat tappet cams on the street with no problems, what if i toned the cam down a little and went to a 215cc port or 210?
09-12-2007 04:53 AM

In case you didn't know, you'll lose anywhere from 18 into 25 % of your horsepower between the flywheel and the rear wheels. The higher percentage loss is probably more realistic. Most of the dyno horsepower numbers are with no alternator or other accessories and an electric water pump. Some, if not all, are without mufflers either.
09-12-2007 03:10 AM
red65mustang Edelbrock "RPM" 350 roller cam motor "power package" with E tec heads is 460HP and streetable....

why gamble that a 260 cam will work with 230 ports...on the street or best possible at the strip?

did you read the builds on the "ryanspage" link I posted?

do note...that is a 460HP "350" build which will out last a 383 due to side load wall wear

I'm not against will gain 30ft/lbs+ of TQ due to more cubes for a faster rate of acceleration....
09-11-2007 11:45 PM
Johnny4311 not a bad idea the supercharger, but i really just wanted naturally aspirated engine, im not too bad against a little nitrous but here is the combo im gonna go with i think, the 383 with a good rotating assembly from CNC motorsports, eagle forged crank, eagle 3D h beams, dart pro 1 230cc heads (i know my low speed torque will suck but will come alive on top end) somewhere in the neighborhood of 10.5:1-10.75:1 compression comp cams solid flat tappet camshaft 260 degrees duration @ .050 .555 lift 110LSA performer rpm air gap or victor jr that should get me somewhere in the 475 flywheel horsepower what do you guys think? i know i will have to spin the $h*t out of it to get it but with a good rotating assembly i should be ok, it dosent have to last forever lol.
09-11-2007 07:20 PM
Realistic horsepower

I'm 99% sure those numbers in the dyno tests are at the crankshaft, not the rear wheels. Unless something has changed in the last year or so. 400 hp at the wheels is a tall order. You're probably going to have truck that doesn't drive very well except when you stand on the gas. Then it'll be awesome!
09-11-2007 07:01 PM
s-10stroker No weight reductions yet.With the small block and Ford 9" rear I probably didn't add more than 250 pounds over when the v-6 was in there.
09-10-2007 09:05 PM
Johnny4311 what kind of weight reductions have you done to your truck?
09-10-2007 08:49 PM
s-10stroker Your truck should weigh approx.3100 pounds.I have a 1984 S-10 with a 388 stroker in it.With a set of slicks mid to high 7's in the 1/8th mile is not unrealistic.
09-10-2007 08:29 PM
Johnny4311 i totally agree with you DV, but i do already have the block in hand, and also ive been thinking of using a solid flat tappet camshaft it would solve the cost problem and eliminate valve float
09-10-2007 06:01 AM
red65mustang from the knowledge base link at the page top:

here's about 50 383 combo's with published dyno #'s (and a bunch of 350's)

you don't need to go $$$$ stroker and roller for 400+fwhp....
Edelbrock Chevy 350 "RPM power package" is 410(fw?)HP with a flat tappet cam....carb/intake/heads/cam "bolt on".....HP peak at 5500
09-10-2007 12:56 AM
DoubleVision 400 horses on pump gas and aluminum heads is rather easy for a 383. Why not shoot for 500? Many of these builds are outlined in chevy high performance articles online. I would only do one thing different, I would use a 880 casting 1 piece rear seal 4 bolt main block that came with a factory roller cam. By going this route over a retro fit roller cam set up, the cash you save can be put towards other parts to make more power. The 1 piece rear seal is also a nice addition, no worry`s about pesky leaks from the 2 piece seal blocks.
09-09-2007 10:55 PM
Realistic Hp question

Hi guys, ive got a 93 S10 SWB reg cab thats gonna be a street strip weekend warrior type vehicle, ive got a narrowed 9 inch ford with ladder bar suspension 3.90:1 gear, lowered 2 inches in front, full interior, all air conditioning components removed manual steering box and front inner fenders removed, and i soon will be cutting the floor of the bed out and putting in aluminum or thin steel wheel tubs, having said all that this is my question, i have a 69 model 4 bolt virgin bore block that im wanting to build a 383 out of, how realistic is 400 rear wheel horsepower on todays pump gas? and im talking 93 octane because thats what we have here in alabama, im not interested in using nitrous or a power adder, i dont mind buying a good set of aluminum heads or a roller camshaft, do you guys have any suggestions? i want something that will perform in the 2500-6000 rpm range, keep in mind that i wont have to run any accessories with the engine.

another questions i have taking into consideration the weight savings i have made what do you think this truck weighs? and if indeed i can achieve 400 rwp what kind of 1/8th mile times you think i can get? considering i can get good traction? thanks for looking guys and eager to hear your input

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999 - 2012. All Rights Reserved.