![]() |
|
|
|
| View Poll Results: Which makes a better GM overdrive transmission for street aplications? | |||
| 200 R-4 |
|
5 | 55.56% |
| 700 R-4 |
|
4 | 44.44% |
| Voters: 9. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
||||||
|
Next upgrade for the money pit. A 4-speed. Which 4 Speed is the best choice?
Here's a question that's never been made into an opinionated pole, and I feel it would be an interesting thread.
Question: There are only about two choices for moderately-priced, GM overdrive transmissions: The 200 R-4 and the 700 R-4 (including all of its nick names throughout its service). Which one of these transmissions makes a better street transmission? bowtieoverdrives.com Makes versions of both beginning around 850 dollars and ending at about 1280 dollars with respective horsepower ratings ranging from 350 to a steady diet of 600+ HP and torque. Presupposing this aftermarket companies' claims are correct about their transmissions ratings (many vouch for their reputation, so I'm inclined to believe). I've been reading a bit about the trannys and I'd have to say that personally I like the 200 better. It still gives you a bit better than the TH350 first gear (2.74 as compared to 2.52) and has a lower overdrive than the 700 (.67). Furthermore, many have expressed dislike at the 700's steep first to second drop in ratio (about 1.5!). What are your opinions and why? K |
|
||||||
|
My choice of the TH-700R4 is for the first gear being low to lower the resistance load on the engine as it now has 171,000 miles on it.
I also like the overdrive ratio being at .70 compared to the 2004R's .67 for the same reason. Also, there is the little fact that when changing from the th-350 to either of the OD's the speedo drive and driven gears are more easily changed in the 700, the tailshaft housing on the 2004R is NON-removeable. Both will necessitate the proper setting of the TV cable, and torque convertor lock-up in OD for longevity. |
|
||||||
|
I like them both. But for your application get the 2004R it has a better gearing. 2.74:1 going to 1.57:1 is a better matched 1rst 2nd than 3.06:1 going to 1.62:1. The 2004R is also lighter and eats up a little less horsepower.
Mike |
|
|
| Recent Transmission - Rearend posts with photos |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|