![]() |
|
|
|
||||||
|
When I first started out , like you I really wanted to get it just right and used the Zahn cup with a stopwatch also. Then it became a issue cleaning the thing after each batch but that was the price of following the learning curve.
After a while once the mix is how you like then you can touch a sample from your mixing stick to a nearby vertical suface and learn the rate a sample runs down after it leaves the paint stick. Soon you'll be able to recognise perfect viscosity weather it's primer or paint or clear ... Good to see you having fun with it too... helping others is the best way to help ourselves
|
|
||||||
|
I was very interested in what you were asking because I paint with other
products beside car paint and most of them have no thinning instructions for spraying. Like wood polyurethane, meant to be put on with a brush but some spray it so how much do you thin? everyone I've asked gives me a different answer. Somewhere, someplace there's bound to be a chart or something stateing what viscosity matches what tip size. I would love to see that. |
|
|||||
|
Hi Jim, Yeagh im interested in this stuff alot too as you can see
![]() For a chart of Viscosity for the guns I think your best bet would be to contact the manufacturer of the gun. I believe since the gun manfacturers are in the business of making guns then they also got to be in the business of knowing what the "Eflux" or viscosity of the liquid that a certain tip size or cap size can spray. They have to have this data otherwise what could they base a gun creation on. I will do some hunting around on this a bit more to see if I can gather additional data. Its kind of a inportant issue when you think about it. So the more we know the more productive we can be right from the get go. Thanks. X |
|
||||||
|
Hold on here X, you measured your viscosity without mixing it? I re-read your post a few times and still see the same thing, you only checked the PAINT, that viscosity recommended by the manufacturer is mixed and ready to spray, so your results mean nothing, not one single thing.
I have never seen the term RTS on anything other than a 1K product that was LITERALLY ready to spray out of the can. By definition "RTS" means there is NOTHING to be added. So if Valspar is calling a product that needs a hardener "RTS" they are going to confuse a lot of people. There are plenty of products from IMRON to clears that are "prereduced" and you only add the hardener in a let's say 4:1 mixture. Are they saying these products are "RTS"?? NO OTHER manufacturer calls a product that you add a hardener to RTS, does it actually say that on the can or literature? Brian |
|
|||||
|
Hi Brian, I measured the Viscosity of the paint I had received in the can.
It was way above what the data sheet said for a "RTS" viscosity without mixing in the Activator. Adding the Activator will and did make the paint thicker. My point from the earlier post was that while the paint looked ok from a visual perspective, the stuff measured with the Zahn 2 cup produced results that were way out of spec with what the spec sheet states for a "RTS" Viscosity. Prior to runing the test, I made sure the paint in the can was mixed with a stick. My measurements are valid. Are you seeing where im coming from now ? Page 2 of the data sheet says. AIR PRESSURES Conventional @ Gun PANEL OVERALL Gravity Feed. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30-35 psi. . . . . . . . 35-45 psi Siphon Feed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35-45 psi. . . . . . . . 45-55 psi HVLP @ Cap . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8-10 psi. . . . . . . . 8-10 psi PHYSICAL DATA VOC (Ready-to-Spray) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Coating: 3.5 lbs/gal (Max) Volume Solids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47.4% (Avg) Theoretical Coverage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 760 sq. ft. per mil per gallon (Avg) Recommended DFT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 - 3 mils. Zahn #2 Viscosity (RTS) . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 - 22 seconds "I assume the Zahn 2 Viscosity would include the Activator" Here is a link to the actual spec sheet, check it out. http://www.autopaintdirect.com/data/840.pdf Thanks.... X |
|
|||||
|
Jim I found a good link that might give you some insight on the tip size to use
vs Viscosity of material you wish to spray. Here you go. http://www.spraygunindustry.com/Info...nViscosity.htm Interesting stuff. Thanks X |
|
||||||
|
Thanks Mr. X. Just what I wanted to see.
|
|
|||||
|
Brian, when I checked the paint last night the temp was about 57 degrees F
the activator added right about 8 seconds to that time. If you look on the data sheet page 1 they offer various activators, from the top down they get thicker in viscosity. I was using the warp speed one. I have others and they are less viscous. The warp speed one looks like treacle but is clear in color. Today I left the paint in a warmer room that was right around 72 degrees for more than 8 hours. Measuring the paint just awhile ago produced a Zahn 2 reading of 35 seconds. Thats a 20 second difference just on the paint. I will be spraying right around 65 F later this week so my intent is to mix the paint knowing its temperature and reduce as needed to bring it into the correct window as indicated on the data sheet. I might just try use a medium reducer as opposed to the fast reducer which I had used previously. I want to try spray out as slick as possible. I shall be using the 1.4 tip on the devilbiss gfg-670 plus gun. Thanks ... X |
|
|||||
|
Wow, that's a really good example of what temperature can do for the viscosity. You can imagine what headaches can be created by using too much reducer in cold paint to get the viscosity right. I was kinda hoping that Barry would chime in on this post and give his nickle on viscosity especially with some of the more solvent poppin prone clears of today. More solvent can sometimes come back to bite ya in the end with more chance of pop and possible dieback problems. But then again I know Milo reduces it how he likes it but I think he's also fond of higher air pressures when applying, nobody can deny that his work looks really good so he's got it the way he feels is best. Personally I try to stay fairly close to what the manufacturer recomends reducerwise. Usually less reducer means more retained gloss after clear. One example is Dupont's Chromaone- spray it without reducer (solid colors) and the gloss will be much more than if it had been reduced. Bob
Last edited by baddbob; 12-03-2005 at 07:21 AM. |
|
|||||
|
Bob, sure surprised me, Its all very interesting indeed. I think the trick is to have
your temperature where you can use it for a good period of time. Then configure your paint so its more suitable for that temp. If you are new to this and I am, your pretty much dead in the water if you dont know the Viscosity of the paint as at that point its only a guessing game. Thats not to say you cant make it spray correctly. I just like to be more informed and try elimate possibility of error up front in advance until I build experience. I agree that Milo has it down, fair dues to the guy he knows what he is doing and is real helpful to others on here too. This place is a goldmine such a cool Board ![]() Thanks .. X |
|
||||||
|
AH HAH,
You ARE a rocket scientist aren't you? I have to give your due, You have tried to answer the 64 million dollar question and done a good job of it too. The Zahn cup is a nice tool but can get you into big trouble as you've (I hope) realized. Reduction is a good thing but like booze need's moderation and common sense. I used one a few times but ended up just staying within the Manuf's guidelines for the product for the most part and had much sucess doing so. It just got to be TOO much measuring and fiddling around.I just want to paint. Glad you got what your looking for. Mike. |
|
|||||
|
Ha, Ha Mike, good to hear from you. Well if nothing else I sure am
persistent lol.Hey, Im new to this so while the Zahn cup might be a little over kill I am now in a position to eliminate the variables. Now im sure I will still have to tweek the process no doubt about that but what I have is a 1/2 decent reference point to move forward with. It kind of cool really. Knowing the viscosity of the material one is spraying can help shed light on problems down the road, assuming the manufacturer got it right that is, Yikes hope they did ![]() Using the cup aint too bad really. Just pop it in the liquid see how it flows out, reduce as needed but dont over reduce. Do it a few times then I can move on to Milos method using the stick drip test. I just need to get a better feel for it so me thinks I am on track. Thanks X. |
|
|
| Recent Body - Exterior posts with photos |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| "Basic of Basics" Can I use "rattle can" paint on my car? | Centerline | Body - Exterior | 33 | 07-08-2011 12:33 PM |
| HVLP Spray guns and paint viscosity: | x711 | Body - Exterior | 21 | 11-15-2005 08:49 PM |
| Painting roof tips needed..... | Bluepen | Body - Exterior | 7 | 09-10-2005 09:26 PM |
| This is interesting. Temporary peel off paint. | kenseth17 | Body - Exterior | 5 | 08-11-2005 09:41 PM |
| First paint scheme for '59 Caddy by me | Nightrider | Body - Exterior | 54 | 07-05-2005 02:27 PM |