![]() |
|
|
|
|||||
|
If you're going through all of the added expense on the long block why are you getting the cheapest cam you can find?
The summit cams are for people who just need something cheap to slap in an engine, not really for a high performance engine like yours. You're leaving A LOT of power on the table by not going with a solid roller or even a solid flat tappet. At least 50 hp. |
|
||||||
|
I see you're block will be "O" ringed and all, but you realize your effective c.r. at 8.5:1 and 14 lbs of boost will be 16.6:1, and at 20 lbs of boost 20:1? And you'll run it daily on the street? I understand you won't be under boost constantly, but it's a bunch or cylinder pressure.
__________________
Horsepower is how fast you hit the wall. Torque is how far you take the wall with you. Midnight Sun Street Rod Association Last edited by 68NovaSS; 11-04-2008 at 11:39 PM. |
|
|||||
|
Oh he won't be running 20 psi, but we can let him think that. It won't take that much either to make 700 hp. 12psi is a lot more practical, and still enough if he builds the rest accordingly.
If he's running summit cams I doubt it though. |
|
|||||
|
Quote:
oh and I won't be running 20psi? What else won't I be doing since you are the all time car know it all? here is some reading material since you probably want to tell these people whats up with their cam's also http://www.theturboforums.com/smf/in...topic=106407.0 Summit Cam? Last edited by darkostoj; 11-04-2008 at 08:40 PM. |
|
|||||
|
I'm not saying Crane is the only choice, in fact for a high hp engine, they wouldn't be a first choice for me. But summit cams are not the greatest by a long shot and cams are not as simple as you are saying. The fact that you are looking at those cams tells me that you really don't know what you're doing. You probably found a few articles, talked to a few sales men, and decided to slap it all together and see what happens.
running 20 psi on a run of the mill 6-71 on a 350 will destroy something major... I'm not sure if it'll be the engine or the blower first but whatever it is, it will be awesome to see. If you really want some good advice and want to do this right then we can help, but none of us will recomend that you go for a cheapo hyd. cam for a 700 hp small block. |
|
||||||
|
First thing I'd be doin' is shopping for a roller block. I know of two that were purchased in the last week by guys on this forum. One for $100 and one for $75. Being able to start with a roller block for such a steal seems like a no-brainer to me. Both these guys are newbies, but they had enough sense to take my recommendation to start with a roller.
|
|
|||||
|
Quote:
For hp, you cannot be soild cams, either flat or roller, and neither requires a roller block. Even if he runs a solid flattie he's better of than a hyd. roller as far as power goes. a hyd roller is nice for a daily driver that you never want to work on but I don't think that this is that type of situation. |
|
||||
|
I would stick with the current cam, I think torque is going to be the least of your worries. I would pay more attention to the 200 tranny as although you indicate "custom" the line pressures, billet shaft, clutches, drum all need to be "the best" to survive without either breaking or burning it up inside. I know, I run one at 700ish. For a converter, you can't be an Edge for price and performance and you do want lock up.
I have dynoed 383's with superchargers and 230 duration camshafts with Brodix heads. 230 to 240 is the range I'd say you will want to be in to meet your goal. The only drawback to either cam is neither takes advantage of the cylinder heads. We would spec a much higher lift. No matter if you make 600 or 700 it will still be more than enough. On the carb, make sure you take note on how the float levels will need adjusting. If like the E85's we have done, they will be MUCH higher than gasoline. Get a big pump as well. |
|
|||||
|
Quote:
You said higher lift would take advantage of these heads. I was going to get it all running with the 1.5's and swap over to 1.6's to see if there was much of an improvement...but that was going to be later on down the line. as far as E85 goes I have a BG220hr fuel pump so that should hopefully give enough volume for E85, but we'll see |
|
||||||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
5 disk? No need for that to lock up on full throttle, either a 9X11 or Edge can do that. PTS in Cali (bruce) or Chris, www.ckperformance.com, in NY or Jake www.jakesperformance.com are the few folks I'd trust to spec out parts for a 200 at this level. All three will work directly with your local builder on the parts that are proven to work. Even if you only make 600 HP there are a ton of things that need to be done correctly to make sure the tranny lives. One flair on a shift and the tranny will be junk at this level. PTC is another excellent converter for your application. I just did some business with Jake and he is a superb resource an will save you a ton of dough on parts. I'd suggest that as a first shot call. Tell him Rick from WI sent you.
Expensive upgrading the rockers versus just getting a cam grind which will get you into the .550+ range with current 1.5 rockers as well as have a much better/more modern ramp profile. Thus making more power. How cams get to the valve events is important, and that is where the advances have been made. Remember as well, or in case you were not aware, most cam manufacturers get thier cores from Crane. Pump should work fine |
|
|
| Recent Engine posts with photos |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| SBC 350 superiority rebuttle...was:POWERED BY CHEVY, WRITTEN ON A FORD, (from 'Engine | Oldsmolac911 | Hotrodders' Lounge | 50 | 01-12-2011 10:00 PM |
| 350 sbc cam suggestions please | sfd771 | Engine | 1 | 07-30-2004 06:25 PM |
| help me pick a cam for my 350 | 74huggerorange | Engine | 14 | 04-28-2004 08:54 PM |
| 350 sbc cam | bowtienut | Engine | 8 | 08-06-2003 01:34 PM |
| Cam grind for a 350 sbc | 30coupe | Engine | 2 | 04-07-2003 07:29 PM |