![]() |
|
|
|
||||||
|
Question about compression.
I know this might have been brought up a few times before but can't find anything.
I understand that in a gasoline V8 engine a compression of about 10.5:1 is pushing the limits of pump gas. But what puzzles me is why does my motorcycle (2008 Kawasaki Ninja ZX-6R) came from the factory with a 13.3:1 compression and ran on premium gas without any problems what so ever, also my new motorcycle (2009 Kawasaki Ninja ZX-14) runs a 12:1 compression on premium. I also know that diesel motors (the ones I work with) run almost 18:1 then are turbocharged to insane amounts of charge PSI. I understand that this is because of the differences in firing methods. What makes these motorcycle engines allow a higher compression then a V8 or other factory car will allow? Hopefully someone is able to answer this, been reading alot and now I'm puzzled. Eric |
|
||||
|
As already stated, aluminum, chamber design, and vehicle weight is a huge one on a bike as they are so light.
Also, cam design plays a role, as most bikes have redlines in the 9000-14000 RPM range. |
|
||||||
|
Aluminum motorcycle enigines expand quite a bit when they are running.
This cylinder barrel, head,crank case expansion actually lowers the physical compression ratio a significant bit. (A small change in piston compression height makes a big difference in a small cubic inch motor) They also have highly advanced high swirl fast burn combustion chambers that don't need as much spark advance, much better control over cylinder to cylinder AFR, Mixture swirl, quench, through out the useable power band and newer ones have advanced electronic knock control and individual cylinder spark timing control. A automotive V8 is limited to the worst knock limit cylinder of the 8 cylinders ant any one time. The power rpm band of a high performacne bike motor is quite a bit higher than a typical V8 so low rpm/ high load lugging is not common. below 3000-4000rpm. The in cylinder running pressure is low(er) at low rpm {BMEP} untill the engine gets up "on the cam" and the induction wave and exhaust system scaveging are "in phase" creating high cylinder charge filling at the higher rpm band. The intake valve timing closing point (begining of actual compression) can be quite a bit later toward TDC to optimise the high(er) rpm resonace wave tuning of the induction and exhaust system. If the typical high performance bike motor gets too far off tune for some reason: lean AFR, carbon,oil in combustion, excessive induction path or combustion chamber heat, over heated valves and detonation and or priignition sets in, they $$self destruct in a hurry$$$ just the same. Even a bad tank of gas can kill it at WOT. Thats what the knock detection/electronic timing control is for. Small(er) bore size engines are naturaly more knock resistant. Last edited by F-BIRD'88; 07-20-2009 at 06:30 PM. |
|
|
| Recent Engine posts with photos |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 406 compression ratio question | e6205m | Engine | 2 | 12-05-2008 05:20 PM |
| Interesting compression question | Jmark | Engine | 11 | 04-26-2006 03:27 AM |
| Compression ratio question | Ratoflic | Engine | 8 | 11-08-2005 05:09 AM |
| Compression testing question. | schnitz | Engine | 28 | 11-06-2005 03:30 AM |
| compression question | 72HeavyChevy | Engine | 1 | 02-19-2003 04:09 PM |