Hotrodders Bulletin Board Hotrodders Bulletin Board
Home · Bulletin Board · Project Journals · Tech Article Wiki · Knowledge Base · Photo Gallery · Classifieds · Company Reviews · Calendar · T-Shirts


Build hot rod how-to articles

100+ user-created articles:
'37-'57 Buick Olds Pontiac suspension upgrade, Body-exterior tips, Bulletproof cooling system, Buying a trailer, Cheapo paint job, Cold air intakes, Cylinder head choice, Determining TDC, E85, Epoxy primer, First paint job, Free T-Bucket plans, GM transmissions, Head gasket, Header design, Health and safety, How to find an electrical drain, How to title a hot rod, How to identify a Ford V8, Make a fiberglass fan shroud, Media blasting, Patching a body panel, Pitted rust, Pre-1980 VIN decoding, Removing stuck fasteners, Rewiring a vehicle, Waterproof panelboard, Why not to use a SBC engine, and many more...

Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Unanswered Posts
Hotrodders Bulletin Board > General Discussion > Site Suggestions and Help
User Name
Password
lost password?   |   register now


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 05-13-2008, 08:16 AM
65smallblock 65smallblock is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: utah
Posts: 86
Wiki Edits: 0

Rediculous article

I find the "why NOT TO use a CSB engine" article to be biased at best and bordering on downright stupid.

Citiing, very common, highly available, reliable and cheap to build as reasons NOT to use a CSB is clearly coming from someone with an axe to grind.

How about throwing in a "reasons for chosing a CSB" article in to keep things in perspective?? Cant think of any "reasons"?? How about highly available, cheap to build, reliable ... ... need more? no problem, wide spectrum to suit different purposes, more aftermarket parts than any other engine on the planet, huge HP potential, easy interchangeability... Things that make me go HMMMMM???
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-13-2008, 08:33 AM
Henry Highrise's Avatar
Henry Highrise Henry Highrise is offline
Moderator
 Henry Highrise's barnstar
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Tupelo, Mississippi
Age: 63
Posts: 14,060
Wiki Edits: 4

re: Rediculous article

Where is this article that you speak of? Is it in the WIKI ? Or are you talking about a thread here on the Bulletin Board? Please provide a link or a url so we can all see what your referring to. Thanks
__________________
Hotrodding is much more than just owning a hotrod...It is a state of mind!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-13-2008, 10:06 AM
matt167 matt167 is offline
Member
 matt167's barnstar
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Prattsville
Posts: 2,887
Wiki Edits: 19

re: Rediculous article

Quote:
Originally Posted by Henry Highrise
Where is this article that you speak of? Is it in the WIKI ? Or are you talking about a thread here on the Bulletin Board? Please provide a link or a url so we can all see what your referring to. Thanks


It's in the Wiki.. it's 1 of the last in the list that appears on the bullitin board top in the " How to build " section.. I just noticed it there at quick glance
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-13-2008, 10:09 AM
matt167 matt167 is offline
Member
 matt167's barnstar
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Prattsville
Posts: 2,887
Wiki Edits: 19

re: Rediculous article

but also, there is an article on why to use a Chevy small block, I can't remember the title but it's in there, just have to look for it... so everything is in perspective.


I don't think you understand the full extent of the article. it's aimed at street rods and hotrods, not high hp vehicles where every hp counts.. but cars that should be diffrent than the next, even if there the same make/year/model.. Hot rods w/ SBC's are common and the value of a SBC powered hotrod can be lesser than say a Buick Nailhead, or an Early Hemi..

Last edited by matt167 : 05-13-2008 at 10:20 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-13-2008, 12:06 PM
Jon's Avatar
Jon Jon is offline
Administrator
 Jon's barnstar
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Colorado
Age: 31
Posts: 4,564
Wiki Edits: 3,456

re: Rediculous article

If there's not already a "Why to use a SBC engine", feel free to start one. The wiki is very democratic -- anyone can start or edit any article.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-13-2008, 12:46 PM
F&J F&J is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Connecticut
Age: 56
Posts: 1,205
Wiki Edits: 0

re: Rediculous article

Quote:
I find the "why NOT TO use a CSB engine" article to be biased at best and bordering on downright stupid.


Quote:
Citiing, very common, highly available, reliable and cheap to build as reasons NOT to use a CSB is clearly coming from someone with an axe to grind.


Ok,I'll admit I did not read the Wiki yet, BUT...the "first two" reasons you posted for NOT choosing a sbc, seem to hold true if a person is building an open hood/hoodless rod. I've seen so many cars built in a trad style, yet the use a modern sbc. Good grief, at least put as much effort in the motor, as the rest of the build ... What the heck is so hard about finding an early sbc, with maybe 265 manifolds, maybe double bump heads, oil fill pipe, etc??? Instead, there is a brand new sbc crate motor...and the usual excuse is "i want something reliable"
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-14-2008, 08:15 AM
65smallblock 65smallblock is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: utah
Posts: 86
Wiki Edits: 0

re: Rediculous article

Quote:
Originally Posted by F&J
Ok,I'll admit I did not read the Wiki yet, BUT...the "first two" reasons you posted for NOT choosing a sbc, seem to hold true if a person is building an open hood/hoodless rod. I've seen so many cars built in a trad style, yet the use a modern sbc. Good grief, at least put as much effort in the motor, as the rest of the build ... What the heck is so hard about finding an early sbc, with maybe 265 manifolds, maybe double bump heads, oil fill pipe, etc??? Instead, there is a brand new sbc crate motor...and the usual excuse is "i want something reliable"



Had to edit after re-reading your post. I can appreciate uniqueness. So you made a reccomendation of something other than a crate motor. Thats fine, but the article doesnt, it simply baggs on the CSB. If the article read "Other options for builder motors" and then made some suggestions it would have made a lot more sense. But to simply put down perhaps the greatest classic motor of all time because of their success.... Sorry, that dont flush..

Last edited by 65smallblock : 05-14-2008 at 08:25 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-14-2008, 10:13 AM
65smallblock 65smallblock is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: utah
Posts: 86
Wiki Edits: 0

re: Rediculous article

OK, I did my own article. The controversial Chevy small block. But apparently I did something wrong, the format seems screwed up. ?? Can someone help with that?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-14-2008, 10:23 AM
Jon's Avatar
Jon Jon is offline
Administrator
 Jon's barnstar
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Colorado
Age: 31
Posts: 4,564
Wiki Edits: 3,456

re: Rediculous article

Nice -- the article is off to a good start . I've just fixed the format.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-14-2008, 10:38 AM
F&J F&J is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Connecticut
Age: 56
Posts: 1,205
Wiki Edits: 0

re: Rediculous article

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon
Nice -- the article is off to a good start . I've just fixed the format.



HR site seemed to have a problem early this AM, could not even get the url to show in the browser after using my bookmark.


Now it's Sooo slow to get to the coalition page and then worse delays getting to it's idex. Got to the index, and can't find his new wiki? or did he add to the old one ??



To 65sb; I did read most of the old wiki, and I really don't see what is so offending? except maybe the comment about the sbc is less powerful. That's wrong as we know, BUT there is a note there saying this comment needs facts & figures added ("as a wiki edit" I would guess?)
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-14-2008, 11:29 PM
65smallblock 65smallblock is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: utah
Posts: 86
Wiki Edits: 0

re: Rediculous article

You dont know whats so offending? How about the title of the article?? It is an article with one purpose, to attack the CSB.


Jon, thanks..
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-16-2008, 12:20 PM
MARTINSR's Avatar
MARTINSR MARTINSR is offline
Brian Martin,Freelance adviser
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: San francisco bay area
Age: 49
Posts: 3,933
Wiki Edits: 0

re: Rediculous article

It's only "offending" if someone should take it personal like saying they dress funny or the kids ugly or something. We are talking about a motor here, not a boob job.

Brian
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-16-2008, 01:40 PM
Henry Highrise's Avatar
Henry Highrise Henry Highrise is offline
Moderator
 Henry Highrise's barnstar
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Tupelo, Mississippi
Age: 63
Posts: 14,060
Wiki Edits: 4

re: Rediculous article

Quote:
Originally Posted by 65smallblock
You dont know whats so offending? How about the title of the article?? It is an article with one purpose, to attack the CSB.


Jon, thanks..

Good gosh man...everybody wants us to be "politically correct" and now...you want us to be hot rod correct. Sheeeeesh. Build them like you want them with whatever motor you like. Its all good.
__________________
Hotrodding is much more than just owning a hotrod...It is a state of mind!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-16-2008, 01:44 PM
poncho62's Avatar
poncho62 poncho62 is offline
Moderator
 poncho62's barnstar
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Hanover, Ontario, Canada
Age: 56
Posts: 13,009
Wiki Edits: 4

re: Rediculous article

Besides, you should not be saying "CSB".................it's "SBC"..........That's like saying "IMEH" instead of "HEMI"..............and, you wouldn't want to upset those RAPOM guys...................
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-16-2008, 02:54 PM
Jon's Avatar
Jon Jon is offline
Administrator
 Jon's barnstar
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Colorado
Age: 31
Posts: 4,564
Wiki Edits: 3,456

re: Rediculous article

The pro-SBC article complements the anti-SBC article. On each article, we can add a link to the opposing argument. Or, we can combine them into one article.

The point of the wiki (in this case) isn't rightness or wrongness. It's efficiency. We spend countless hours debating the SBC controversy. It makes more sense just to document the various viewpoints on one page, rather than having everyone repeat their argument every other week when this issue comes up. The time and social energy that we save in the process can be invested in more constructive pursuits.

Anyway, job well done 65smallblock . Rather than just complaining, you put your money where your mouth is, and started a wiki article to document the opposing viewpoint.
Reply With Quote
Reply Back to top


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads for: "Rediculous article"
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Thanks Sprecher48 for VW engine basics wiki article Jon Engine 1 05-05-2008 01:08 PM
wiki article: Cheapo Paint Job Jon Body - Exterior 0 11-13-2007 11:08 AM
need help on wiki article: pitted rust Jon Body - Exterior 4 08-07-2007 08:38 AM



Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.3.2 © 2005, Crawlability, Inc.
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:33 AM.
Copyright Hotrodders.com 1999 - 2008. All Rights Reserved.