![]() |
|
|
|
||||||
|
Quote:
I replaced that failed bump-stick with an even lumpier flat-tappet one. It (knock on wood) seems to be hanging in there this time. Time will tell, as the truck hasn't turned a wheel yet ... and it's been 4 years. Money and ambition ... still looking for a pail full of each.
|
|
|||||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Bugger? AAAA? sounds Canadian
|
|
|||||
|
I used a Howards retrofit roller cam in my 406 and am happy with it, as far as the timing cover I just bought one from summit with a wear plate I believe it is called in it and used a cam button in conjunction with that, the pushrods are lunati, I can possible check my summit order history and get the lengths and pn's for you.
Shane |
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Sir: I beg to differ: I have been reading this site for awhile as well as others..I sum this up with Inspector1's reply from another person asking on which way to go...Your saying that his logic is wrong? Just wondering and not trying to start an argument, but the logic I see in Inspector1's comments are reasonable....Also, since I was already corrected about Joe Gibbs turning 9,000 rpm's with his engines, that explained it to me...I was corrected... Furthermore, my current motor has 170,00+ miles on it and it is toast..It is my opinion that when Cash for Clunkers failed to get all the older cars off the road 2 yrs ago, and GM failed, as well...It could be that the next step was the oil,.... 1,000,000,000,000 ohms of resistance is the reason why, our country is in the trouble it is in...When bankers, Car manufacturers and whoever else wants Tax payer dollars, because they could not balance their check book from the wild parties they throw, that is a conspiracy, because you and me would have been thrown in jail for fraud... I used that amount of ohms, because people keep allowing the status quo to do the same things over and over again....To much resistance to think outside the box~! From Inspector1 on this site; http://www.clubhotrod.com/chevy-smal...uggestion.html "OK, I'll comment more. DO NOT USE A FLAT TAPPET CAMSHAFT, REPEAT, DO NOT USE A FLAT TAPPET CAMSHAFT. If you were aware of the number of flat tappet cams I see roached, you wouldn't even consider one. It's not just the fact that the cam and lifters are ruined and you have to buy them again, it's the fact that the motor has to be removed, completely torn down and all cracks, crevises and oil galleys must be cleaned just like they were when you first put the motor together. So, there's the cost of new cam and lifters, all new gaskets, all the cleaning, re-assembly and the possibility that it will happen all over again. I know there are those of you who have successfully used a flat tappet camshaft, or know someone who has, but everything must be absolutely perfect to prevent wiping a lobe. It's just not worth the gamble when a roller hydraulic camshaft and roller lifters aren't that much more money. I'm going to suggest a Howard's CL110235-12 retrofit cam for you with an intake closing point that will match up with your 8.99:1 static compression ratio. You don't want to use any more cam than this with your low SCR. If you want to use more cam, then change the pistons to 12cc units and use a Howards CL110245. Howards are a little less money than some of the other manufacturers, but still have the reputation of being an excellent product and have been for many years. DO NOT USE A FLAT TAPPET CAMSHAFT." Last edited by Dannyringo; 04-10-2012 at 07:45 PM. |
|
|||||
|
Quote:
\Thanks again... |
|
|||||
|
My order history with Summit is only showing up back to December 2010
. If my memory serves me correctly they were 7.25", which with Google I am coming up with 7.25'' - 7.3''.
|
|
|||||
|
Quote:
I was looking last nite at comps website and I wrote a tech question about their 2 different lengths of pushrods they sell for the same cam...1=7.266, 2=7.300....I wondered if one was for the 1.6 rocker and the other for 1.5?... |
|
||||||
|
Quote:
The I don't think moving to a 1.6 rocker would necessitate a pushrod length change, but I could very well be wrong. |
|
|||||
|
sound logic to me
Quote:
|
|
|||||
|
Quote:
I think I'm sold on using the Retro Roller cam...I would prefer to get a newer vortec L-31 block, but for the van it is going into, there would be too much difference with the oil pan, dipstick location, as well as other hard parts placement...I need to KISS this project! (KEEP IT SIMPLE FOR STUPID: ME) Moreover, there is no guarantee on oil and the companies continued changing of oil properties to less than optimal anti-wear additives... With a roller cam, I eliminate 2 problems... 1) cam break in (NO WIPED LOBES) 2) finding cheap oil for a daily driver w/o buying additives, or mail order~! I can use almost any oil off the shelfs and have no worries.. AND the Benefits of freeing up HP by the rollers themselves and the added benefits of a cam change without buying new lifters and again breaking in a cam... Lastly:"if it ain't broke, don't fix it~!" Well, why would all those companies that build cars for a living, abandon the Hyd. Flat Tappet Cam for the Hyd. Roller Cam....What part of this problem is everyone resistance for changing over to the new design? Like I said the other day, it is all about 1,000,000,000 ohms of resistance... People don't like change, so they resist trends in all facets of life... Last edited by Dannyringo; 04-11-2012 at 02:02 PM. |
|
||||||
|
Again, I think you are over analyzing it. Why would cam companies still be selling flat tappet cams if they were all doomed to fail. Do your proper break in, change your oil regularly and use the right oil.
Now, you want more confusion? Better figure out your proper pushrod length for proper performance. Its not one lenght for roller rockers and one for standard. If you are using roller rockers better make sure you have the correct length pushrods. So search that on this site and then you will see your head spin!! |
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Why would Comp Cams advertise their Retro Rollers FIRST when you look up SBC cams on their site? Also, talked to COMP CAMS and found out that the reason why they have 2 different pushrods is that one is HARDENED, while the OTHER IS NOT for the cam that I am looking at~! I thought it might have been for 1.5 and the other for 1.6 rockers, not what you just claimed...that was someone else speculating... Anyways, I already made up my mind to go retro roller anyways and I will have a ton of advantages to going this method.... And the number one reason for going this route is I DO NOT HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT WIPING A LOBE, then trying to deal with a manufacturer....NUFF SAID~! Last edited by Dannyringo; 04-11-2012 at 07:33 PM. |
|
|||||
|
Just do a google search on "wiped cam lobe" or "I wiped my cam lobe"
Then look at the dates, 2010, 2011 as well as 2012.... Search About 37,300 results (0.27 seconds YA, RIGHT~! no concern and I am over analyzing it? 37,300 hits in under 1/2 second~! |
|
|
| Recent Hotrodding Basics posts with photos |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| retro hit hyd roller cam in oe roller block? | 973kgt | Engine | 4 | 07-26-2010 08:54 AM |
| Hyd. Roller lifters on Solid roller cam | danrace1 | Engine | 6 | 01-28-2010 05:21 PM |
| Hyd Roller Cam W/Solid Roller Lifters? | RoyLeoGracie | Engine | 12 | 02-03-2009 10:15 AM |
| Roller cam vs. Flat Tappet cam | Half Breed | Engine | 4 | 01-11-2006 08:31 PM |
| What cam to go with Hyd. or solid (flat tappet BBC) | Bumpstick | Engine | 2 | 05-02-2005 08:26 PM |