Roller valvetrain in Ford 460 - Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board -- Hot Rod Forum

Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Unanswered Posts Auto Escrow Insurance Auto Loans
Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board > Tech Help> Engine
User Name
lost password?   |   register now

LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 07-05-2008, 07:41 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Fresno
Posts: 16
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Roller valvetrain in Ford 460

I'm working on a 1978 ford 460 engine. My idea and plan is to make as efficient an engine as possible, while getting the most bang for my buck. I'm not too concerned about horsepower; this is going in a car weighting nearly 6,000lbs, so it's not going to be raced, only cruised in both on and off the highway. I don't have all the money in the world, but I am willing to put money into things that'll do the most.

I was planning on changing to a roller cam and rockers, but I've heard that a roller cam and rockers don't really work well in these engines and wouldn't be worth the money for what I want to accomplish. Is this true?

I do plan on getting fuel injection on this engine; from what I understand and have read I can use a late model top end- heads, intake, exhaust, etc- and be ok.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 07-05-2008, 09:27 PM
Registered User
Last photo:
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 1,172
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
In this order:

1) small tube headers, tuned collectors, expansion chambers, efficient mufflers etc.

2) a good strong 4x4 or RV cam, check CompCams catalog. Valve springs to match. all the lift you can get. You already have 1.7 factory rocker arms. I would stay with stock.

3) hot ignition with a moderate advance curve, vacuum advance mandatory. I like MSD on a 460 like this. Multi spark up to 3000 rpm helps efficiency.

4) intake manifold and carb size is not that important. Stock 4 bbl intake will be fine below 4500 rpm, but a low rpm aftermarket dual plane like Performer (NOT RPM) and a well tuned carb is a help.

5) mild bowl ported stock heads, definitely get the smog bump out and polish the exhaust port.

6) Compression? Geez you are fighting a low compression (8.0 or less) battle without changing pistons. If you accidently stumble into a set of 69-71 429 closed chamber heads, that would help if you can get the quench distance down to a reasonable amount. The pistons are way down in the hole.

I guess the late model 90s truck fuelie set up will be an improvement.
In town cruising mileage can't mean much with 6000 pounds and a 460.

In town gear ratio will make a big difference for acceleration, but kill mileage on the road.
If you get a 3/4 ton truck AOD that would help for any time you can get into OD.

Have a 460 like yours on the stand now, for a lighter car 3800. All torque, 5200 rpm max.

People call me a Ford guy, maybe I am
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 07-05-2008, 10:05 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Fresno
Posts: 16
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Yeah, it was getting pretty hard on gas towards the end; somewhere like 7-9 mpg on a good day. It all changes on the freeway though; had it up to 15-17 mpg. That's why I was thinking fuel injection of some kind, either multi-port or tbi for better in town mileage. The late model idea was due to price- can't beat those half-off sales at pick-a-part!

That's interesting though. Would getting rid of the smog bump on the heads be something I can reasonably do myself?

I was also told that a mild stroker setup with either an offset ground crank(making a 4.125 stroke) or a regular stroker crank(only one I could find was 4.150). Any thoughts?

If I read my diff tag right, I've got a 9" gear with a 2.75 ratio. I was considering an AOD but wasn't sure it would be better than the C6 I have now; perhaps it's time to reconsider.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 07-05-2008, 11:24 PM
4 Jaw Chuck's Avatar Moderator
Last photo:
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Manitoba, Canada
Age: 49
Posts: 6,171
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 120
Thanked 445 Times in 321 Posts
To improve your in town mileage try a shorter gear in the rear, a 3.25 or 3.50 will move the weight while not cutting into your highway mileage that much.

Have you considered a rebuild? There is no better bang for the buck than a good seal on the rings and no leak past the valves, it will boost your mileage and get some of that lost torque.

Forget the roller valve train stuff, the efficiency gain is less than can get better than that by running narrower tires and pumping them to 40psi.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 07-05-2008, 11:50 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Fresno
Posts: 16
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I don't think I'll want to run any narrower tires than I have; might pop under the strain... but maybe not.

I think I will try the gears though; gotta replace the seal since it leaks and always wondered if it could be geared better.

So you think I'll be more than satisfied with a good basic stock rebuild? Just get really good rings and seals on the heads? Hell, if that's the case, that's cool; that means more money for paint and such!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Recent Engine posts with photos

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name (usually not your first and last name), your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:
Please select your insurance company (Optional)


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hydraulic roller lifters and 1986 Ford V6 hirax Engine 0 08-14-2007 06:36 AM
Beware of one piece oil pan gasket for a Ford 460..... onebadmerc Engine 0 12-30-2006 06:00 PM
Carb recommendation for a 460 Ford....... onebadmerc Engine 17 12-29-2006 06:34 AM
89 efi 460 motor in to 78 ford ltd wagon 74bubba Engine 3 07-28-2003 07:56 AM
Installing Comp Cam Roller Rockers on 5.0L Ford Motorsports GT-40 mikebmac Engine 2 07-23-2003 10:22 PM

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999 - 2012. All Rights Reserved.