Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board

Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board (http://www.hotrodders.com/forum/)
-   Engine (http://www.hotrodders.com/forum/engine/)
-   -   SBC Deep sump oil pan ? (http://www.hotrodders.com/forum/sbc-deep-sump-oil-pan-161028.html)

y2k600f4 07-02-2009 02:46 PM

SBC Deep sump oil pan ?
 
I am trying to compare the usage of a stock SBC 4 Qt pan (7.5) depth and a 7 Qt aftermarket deep sump pan (8.25) depth with the associated matched extended pickup for the pan (below) both pans have baffles and in this case no windage trays are used; also a HV oil pump is used:

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/SUM-G3502/http://]http://www.summitracing.com/parts/SUM-G3502P/

I know there is two purposes of using a deep sump pan:

1. To reduce the windage of the oil: the deeper pan in combo with the kick outs lets you run an oil level lower than OEM to keep it further from the crank by running 4-5 qts in the 7 qt pan
2. To run 3 additional quarts of oil to extend oil change intervals, protection of oil starvation due to leakage etc
My question is in a SBC 383 (400 crank) is there an advantage of running oil levels further from the crank ? What would be the noticeable effects of running the oil level too high be ?? Would the oil splashed splashed on the cylinder walls due to windage over power the rings causing oil consumption to a point until the oil was at a level below the crank that would not be effected by windage ?

carsavvycook 07-02-2009 02:52 PM

There is one small problem with the 7 quart pan you have a link to. It is not clearanced for a stroker crankshaft. It will have a knock that will drive you nuts. :D

y2k600f4 07-02-2009 02:55 PM

Quote:

There is one small problem with the 7 quart pan you have a link to. It is not clearanced for a stroker crankshaft. It will have a knock that will drive you nuts.
I did read that on the summit page. Thing is it was on the engine before the build and was put back on....no noticeable knocking :rolleyes:

carsavvycook 07-02-2009 03:26 PM

I ordered a Milodon 7 quart oil pan for a 383 stroker. In the box was a non-stroker clearanced oil pan. It had not appeared that the box had been opened before. The next morning, next day air, I received a second one which was clearanced. Summit's customer service is second to no one.

Maybe yours came clearanced for a stroker, and you did not know it.

This blown 383's total fill, with the oil filter is 7 quarts. So the oil pan only has 6 quarts in it at the full mark on the dip stick. The oil does not cavitate, and I have not seen any oil consumption since replacing the cheap/leaky oil pan that was on it a year ago.

y2k600f4 07-04-2009 06:52 AM

Thanks for the info....

Actually was hoping to learn about pros/cons of running a deep sump pan full vs normal capacity ??

carsavvycook 07-04-2009 06:05 PM

Here is a link to Milodon, and in the left column is their explanation for usage of the various oil pans they make.

http://www.milodon.com/oil-pans/oil-...om-milodon.asp

cobalt327 07-04-2009 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by y2k600f4
My question is in a SBC 383 (400 crank) is there an advantage of running oil levels further from the crank ?

I think that running the oil lower than where the level would be if using a standard depth pan helps reduce windage, as you said. This is of greater benefit than running additional oil in the pan, IMO.

Quote:

What would be the noticeable effects of running the oil level too high be ?? Would the oil splashed splashed on the cylinder walls due to windage over power the rings causing oil consumption to a point until the oil was at a level below the crank that would not be effected by windage ?
It could very well overpower the oil control rings as you stated. You would likely lower the level yourself before waiting for the oil to be used up by burning it, though. There would be a lot of noticeable smoke, and the plugs might foul, the engine could well be detonating because of the oil diluting the incoming fuel/air charge, etc.

Jsup 07-05-2009 07:57 AM

Hey, I did a lot of research and I went with a Kevko pan.

http://www.kevkoracing.com/

If you call there they will help out. All an oil pan has to do is hold oil, and not leak. I felt the product was of good quality.

They have an adapter pickup for the standard melling pumps.

I'm not promoting them, I just know they can guide you through their product line better than Summit can to make sure you get the right thing. I needed a passenger side dipstick and they made it up for me. They can do what you need. I paid just over $200 for my pan.

engineczar 07-05-2009 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jsup
All an oil pan has to do is hold oil, and not leak.

You're kidding with this statement right?

There is horsepower to be found in choosing the right configuration of oil pan. Also depending on if a car is to be raced either drag, circle track, or road racing having the correct baffling can make a difference when it comes to keeping the pickup covered and not cooking the bearings.

y2k600f4 07-06-2009 09:21 AM

Quote:

I think that running the oil lower than where the level would be if using a standard depth pan helps reduce windage, as you said. This is of greater benefit than running additional oil in the pan, IMO.

Thanks for the tip...I think I will try to run 5 qts in my 7 qt pan; still 1 qt more than a stock 4qt SBC pan.

Will I be able to trim my dipstick tube to register from 3-7 qts ? 3 being 1 qt low (add) on a 4 qt pan and 7 being full on the 7 qt pan running full capacity (plan on running 5 qt with 4 qt being 1 qt low or "add"). The oil pan depth is 8.25 inches (stock it is 7.5") . Thanks.

cobalt327 07-06-2009 10:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by y2k600f4
Will I be able to trim my dipstick tube to register from 3-7 qts ?

I'd suggest leaving the tube as-is, and scribe a new "full" and "1 qt. low" lines onto the back side of the original stick. This way, should you decide to run more or less oil later on, you can remark or replace the dipstick, and the tube will be fine.

Add all but 1 quart of oil. Run the engine long enough to circulate the oil to the filter and rest of the engine. Stop it let rest for 5 minutes and mark the stick with the 1 qt. low mark.

Fill w/the last quart and repeat the deal, marking the stick w/a "full" indicator.

In any event, should you want to trim the tube, go by what you see by inserting the stick, not be measuring the depth of the old pan as compared to the new pan. Use what the dipstick indicates to determine how much to remove from the tube.

y2k600f4 07-06-2009 11:17 AM

Cobalt327 thanks for the tips I will give that a try. Actually I have trimmed the tube 1" already in the past and have an OEM SBC dipstick with trying to maintain 7qts on the dipstick is difficult. If the level falls .5-1 qts it comes off the dipstick. I am not sure if it is due to the pan shape with the kickout that a very small change in amount of oil in the system results in a larger change on the level shown on the dipstick; it appears I need a longer dipstick than the 19.5" stock one.

y2k600f4 07-07-2009 08:17 PM

Frustrated with a simple dipstick
 
I'm been messing around with this dispstick situation for over a yr and it still is giving me strange and inconsistent readings. I started out with an after market chrome dipstick (installed when I bought the car) which is utilized with an aftermarket summit 7qt pan (with kickouts); also previously installed. I ended up trimming the dipstick tube a while back ~1"...still having problems I picked up an OEM dipstick from a local u-pull-it from a SBC. I think there is something going on in the pan area or where the dipstick goes in the block, since it seems like the dipsitck gets "hung up" in that area. If I place the dipstick in one way the oil reading is off the dipstick if I place it 180 degrees it reads full !!! Also when the dipstick is inserted it sounds like it is rubbing the pan. I recently had the engine rebuilt ~300 miles ago and having a difficult time monitoring the oil level. I really don't want to drop the pan (would have to pull engine). I know a dipstick is a pretty simple thing but I am at witts end on what is going on. Is it this pan ??? :mad:

cobalt327 07-07-2009 08:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by y2k600f4
I'm been messing around with this dispstick situation for over a yr and it still is giving me strange and inconsistent readings.

Oh yes- now I remember this dip stick! :evil: lol

ericnova72 07-07-2009 08:57 PM

Did you (or the previous owner) forget to install the lower guide dipstick tube into the block?? It goes into the block dipstick tube location before the upper tube is inserted. Its function is to guide the stick down into the pan past the crank and main cap. If it isn't there the dipstick will try to curl either up towards the crank or down and out towards the pan side.

Commonly lost or left out part at rebuild, it is basically just a piece of 5/16" fuel line about 7" long with the flare still on the upper end to keep it from falling through into the pan. The factory piece is slightly larger than 5/16" to fit tighter in the hole, but 5/16" works fine, the upper tube holds it down and tight.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:33 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright Hotrodders.com 1999 - 2012. All Rights Reserved.