The Sbc Legend, The 327 ? - Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board
Hotrodders.com -- Hot Rod Forum



Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Unanswered Posts Auto Escrow Insurance Auto Loans
Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board > Tech Help> Hotrodding Basics
User Name
Password
lost password?   |   register now

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-29-2008, 08:42 AM
chevy350_Camd's Avatar
VROOOM !!!!!!
 

Last journal entry: This is the Rough Draft of the V8 Frame
Last photo:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bluff City Kansas
Age: 21
Posts: 133
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The Sbc Legend, The 327 ?

Hi guys, Im not here to ask how much power I have or which ways I could Im just here to learn something about a motor that I kind of like. I just wanted to know facts about it, why it was was of the best small blocks ever made, How could it rev so High and hold it there for awhile, why did it die out ?. What would be its best at racing ?. How High can they rev ?. Which Is better for longer life the Large Journal or the small journal, why were these motors always put onto a powerglide transmission, Are they fairly good gas savers stock ?. People have told me they rev so fast you have to watch what out cause it will blow up so fast, is all this true ?. I know Ive been annoying in the past, but Im just wanting to learn about motors because i want to have a career in it. Thanks

    Advertisement
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-29-2008, 09:52 AM
68NovaSS's Avatar
Hotrodders.com Moderator
 
Last wiki edit: Working with chromed bolts
Last journal entry: New to me T-Bucket
Last photo:
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Nine Mile Falls, Washington
Posts: 5,218
Wiki Edits: 9

Thanks: 101
Thanked 130 Times in 121 Posts
Moving to the Basics Forum.
__________________
Boost adds dignity to what would otherwise be a vulgar brawl...

Midnight Sun Street Rod Association
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-29-2008, 12:22 PM
327NUT's Avatar
Registered User
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: So. Utah
Age: 67
Posts: 3,203
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 64 Times in 58 Posts
Ok good, since you're asking in this way........The 327 chevy was introduced due to the horse power wars heating up "back in the day". The cars were getting bigger/heavier and the 283 couldn't produce the needed torque. The same reason the 350 took the 327's place years later. The 327 is a great engine but it has it's limits like all engines.

Lot's of myths in "engine lore" but they were high revers due to the large bore, short stroke design, like the infamous 302 Z-28. To answer your question about "blowing up".....you can over rpm any engine to the point it will grenade after a while but whoever told you that they blow up quickly is just taking out their a--. The 327 came with 3 speeds, 4 speeds and of course the Powerglide because thats all chevy had back then for an automatic.

The small journal vs. large is a mute point for the street, use whichever you have. In all out racing the small journal would see a little less amount of parasitic loss due to the smaller bearing surface. You can build a mild 327 with a 2 bbl or small 4 bbl or better yet with a good fuel injection set up it ....and keep your foot out of it then you could get decent mileage, but remember it's still a 327 cubic inch engine so it needs to be fed more fuel/air than say a 283.

There's nothing magical or mysterious about the 327, it's just one of the well engineered sbc that were produced. If you have one then do your homework and build it to meet your*** NEEDED APPLICATION *** and you'll have an engine that will last a long time........Dave
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-29-2008, 01:31 PM
Henry Highrise's Avatar
Lost in the 60's
 
Last wiki edit: Removing stuck fasteners Last photo:
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Dixieland
Age: 69
Posts: 15,189
Wiki Edits: 4

Thanks: 0
Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
Hats off to you Dave...that was a very good answer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-29-2008, 01:38 PM
DoubleVision's Avatar
Not Considered a Senior Member
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Heart Of Dixie
Age: 40
Posts: 10,654
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 15
Thanked 58 Times in 55 Posts
What was said is true. You can build one to rev a long way up there if you got a real fat wallet, but you wont do it on stock parts. while a 327 is my favorite small block, you can have all the revs you want, I'll take the torque of a 400 small block any day. Torque is what moves you, not horsepower.
The horsepower wars kicked off the in the 50s, the 283 reached a impression factory peak of 315 horsepower. In 1962, the demand for more horsepower made chevy engineers create a bigger small block with a bigger bore and longer stroke, 4.000 X 3.250 The 327. in 1964, it reached its zenith, the 375 horsepower version that came with a solid lifter duntov 30 30 cam, 11:1 forged pistons, 2.02 1.60 valve heads, mechanical fuel injection, dual exhaust. The highest horsepower rating of any small block, however, this is misleading. When 1967 rolled around, chevy again increased displacement by increasing the stroke to 3.480 to create 350 cubic inches. Chevy knew as everybody did, the more displacement the more power, leaving no future for the 327 and it was discontinued in 1969. In 1970, the LT1 350 was introduced, using many of the same parts the 327 did in its highest horsepower form, only it used a holley carb, it was rated at 370 horsepower, even so it had far more. the 350 became chevys flag ship small block.
many things you will hear from "small block genuises" as I call them, like it'll blow due to revving too high and etc. The valve train limits revability, the valves will float long before it'll come apart providing the bottom end is in good shape. The small journal had some issues, while they were good engines, the rods are somewhat weak, so if any real performance is planned with it, replace the rods with better aftermarket units. Remember also, shorter stroke engines somewhat rev fast, but, if you take a bigger engine with a light rotating assembly it'll rev faster, weight plays a big role. Many other things add to this also. For you I would suggest you read online about the small block chevy, all the answers are there is more written about it than any other engine in history.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 05-29-2008, 04:03 PM
techinspector1's Avatar
Senior Curmudgeon
 
Last wiki edit: DynoSim combinations Last photo:
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hemet, California, USA
Age: 72
Posts: 12,603
Wiki Edits: 326

Thanks: 701
Thanked 891 Times in 758 Posts
The max power 327's were built in an era where very high octane fuel was available at the corner filling station, so operating an iron-headed motor at 11.0:1 on the street was no problem at all. Add a mechanical flat tappet cam of very long duration and either two 4-bbl carbs or Rochester mechanical fuel injection and you have a recipe for 365 hp with carbs or 375 hp with injection. The short 3.25" stroke, fairly light reciprocating parts and solid lifters allowed the motors to rev to the moon.

As you have more than likely learned from this board, any engine you screw together is no more than an air pump. You can move more air two ways. Increase displacement or rev higher.

Previously, I gave you the formula for determining static compression ratio. Now, I'll give you the formula for determining air flow through a motor in cubic feet per minute (CFM). A naturally-aspirated motor (meaning that the cylinders are filled by the push of atmospheric pressure only, without the aid of a supercharger or turbocharger) will not fill the cylinders fully on a run-of-the-mill grocery getter motor. Some specific-designed naturally aspirated racing motors will exceed 100% with tuned intake and exhaust runner lengths and diameters, but for the sake of determining the CFM of a naturally aspirated grocery getter, we use something less than 100%, usually based on common sense and the combination at hand. In other words, if you are using highly efficient cylinder heads, you might use a 90 or 95% figure in your calculations. If you're using junk smog heads and intake manifold from the 70's, you might use a 80 or 85% efficiency figure in your calculations.

First, to find cubic inches, you must know the bore and stroke and number of cylinders. In the case of a 327, that's 4.000" and 3.25" and 8.
So, 0.7854 times 4 times 4 times 3.25 times 8 equals 326.72 cubic inches, rounded off to 327.
Next, pick an rpm where you want to find the CFM. W'ell use 7000 in this exercise, because the little 327 had no problem revving to 7000.....and beyond. And we'll use an efficiency figure of 85%, because of the relatively old school heads and manifold architecture used on these motors originally.

There are 1,728 cubic inches in a cubic foot. If this motor were a 2-stroke where the cylinders are filled with every ONE revolution of the crankshaft, we would use the 1,728 figure. But it's not, it's a 4-stroke, where the cylinders are filled every TWO revolutions of the crankshaft or every 720 degrees of crankshaft rotation. Therefore, instead of 1,728, we'll use double that, or 3,456 in our equation.

7000 times 327 divided by 3456 equals 662 CFM. Multiplying that number times 0.85 (85% efficiency) equals 562 CFM.

On the flip side, using a motor with 400 cubic inches, but turning less rpm, we'll look at a comparison:
400 times 6000 divided by 3456 times 0.85 equals 590 CFM. So, you could theoretically make more power with a 400 turning 6000 than you could with a 327 turning 7000, all other things being equal.

Hope this helps with your education.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 05-29-2008, 05:23 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 39
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
So you say the 1080 Holly three barrel I had on my 327 back in the late 60s was a little overkill? I still have the carb on the shelf in the garage. I guess thats where it belongs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 05-29-2008, 06:04 PM
poncho62's Avatar
Out of the Loop Moderator
 
Last wiki edit: Streetbeasts links
Last journal entry: at car show
Last photo:
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Hanover, Ontario, Canada
Age: 62
Posts: 16,858
Wiki Edits: 5

Thanks: 20
Thanked 247 Times in 201 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by cgates
So you say the 1080 Holly three barrel I had on my 327 back in the late 60s was a little overkill? I still have the carb on the shelf in the garage. I guess thats where it belongs.
Had one on a 454 LS6......Good times..............
__________________
Ontario Rodders

Budget RVs
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 05-29-2008, 11:56 PM
327NUT's Avatar
Registered User
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: So. Utah
Age: 67
Posts: 3,203
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 64 Times in 58 Posts
Thanks Henry I appreciate the kudo's......speaking of the 3 bbl. Holley, back in '65 my brother bought a '63 split window as a theft recovery. I know this will sound like name dropping but he went to high school with Gale Banks and we were going to El Mirage with Gale and his '53 stude.....poor man's pit crew. I was 18 and they were 22, nobody had any money back then but man did we have a lot of fun.

So along with Gale in his little one car garage/shop we put together a nice 327 with the fuelie heads and 30-30 cam and for some unknown reason installed a 950 cfm Holley 3 bbl. carb. It was a major pig till about 4000 then the engine would start to catch up to that big Holley and it would start to SCREAM. Learned how to "row" that Muncie pretty well with that car. I think he sold that '63 for $1700 a couple of years later.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Recent Hotrodding Basics posts with photos

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name (usually not your first and last name), your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
sbc 327 68novafan Engine 3 08-12-2007 04:59 PM
come ONE come ALL! SBC debate: 327, 350, 383 or 400. which do you like best and why? tony350ss Engine 50 06-14-2006 09:14 AM
327 SBC identification numbers ? 1 Day Engine 2 07-11-2004 07:29 AM
327 sbc w/350 hp cam overheats/stalls pircjo Engine 10 05-11-2003 07:18 AM
sbc 327 heads sonic Engine 3 10-05-2002 10:45 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright Hotrodders.com 1999 - 2012. All Rights Reserved.