![]() |
|
|
|
|||||
|
Because a 0 degree angle would do more harm than good. There's more to a head than valve angle and if you consider what else move when you move the valve angle it becomes apparant why. Look at the head from the intake manifold to the valve face.
|
|
||||||
|
the overly simplified answer is that the more you make air change direction the bigger the restriction to airflow, and since intake side flow is usually generated by a relatively weak vacuum you for the most part want to minimize direction change as much as you want to maximize exposed valve opening area in the chamber.
For the most part, a flatter valve angle should result in less of a chance of the valve hitting the piston, but may cause more clearance and shrouding problems with they cylinder wall. |
|
|
| Recent Engine posts with photos |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Lunati cam and 305 sbc questions in a Frankenstein | low budget rodder | Engine | 13 | 06-30-2009 04:55 AM |
| Odd SBC valve cover problem. | junior stocker | Engine | 7 | 12-18-2008 10:36 PM |
| Valve Lash & Cam Operation - Basic Questions | leejoy | Engine | 7 | 12-14-2008 05:13 PM |
| Piston notching for valve relief/clearance | OHD | Engine | 9 | 09-16-2008 10:27 AM |
| Pinion Angle? Again? | oldskools10 | Transmission - Rearend | 7 | 01-27-2007 01:48 PM |