Hotrodders.com -- Hot Rod Forum



Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Unanswered Posts
Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board > Tech Help> Engine
User Name
Password
lost password?   |   register now


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread share on Facebook  
  #1  
Old 04-27-2009, 06:43 PM
fortkenter fortkenter is offline
Registered User
 

Last journal entry: Starting Off
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Bristol,ct
Posts: 7
Wiki Edits: 0

283 questions

I was just wondering what a good estimate of HP my motor has so I can better plan for the future of my truck. This is what i have: 1972 chevy c10 lwb fs. under the hood is a 283 from a 64 nova 202 hump heads from a 67 or 68 350 edelbrock performer intake holly double pump 600cfm carb mallorry HEI extreme energy cam 283/289 and heddman long tubes thats about it. no machine work all original internals besides cam and lifters.


Register now (free) or login to remove ads
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-27-2009, 06:53 PM
BIGWISEXY BIGWISEXY is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: kentucky
Posts: 47
Wiki Edits: 0

if those heads have the 202 valves your looking at trouble, i had a pair of 375 double humps with the 202 valves and that smacked my pistons. need something smaller.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-27-2009, 07:05 PM
cobalt327's Avatar
cobalt327 cobalt327 is offline
WFO
 
Last wiki edit: Intake manifold
Last journal entry: 1980 Malibu Wagon
Last photo:
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Atlanta
Age: 57
Posts: 15,649
Wiki Edits: 1,616

I doubt you will want to hear my personal opinion, but w/o going into the gory details of why this is mismatched, I would say that if you swapped out the short block for a 350 or 383 short block, you will be a LOT happier w/the performance.

If you want to keep the 3" stroke, you will need heads that will keep the CR up as well as the keep the port velocity high to ever hope to use the potential of the cam. The way things are now, the engine might have peak power above 6K RPM, with a CR below 9.5:1.

In your case the 2.02/1.60 valves are more of a hindrance than a help. They will be shrouded w/that stock bore. The heads have reasonably-sized ports, though. You may well need a smaller combustion chamber to get the CR up or use domed pistons, but they have there own problems. A decked set of 305 castings would be a low-buck approach to solving the problems associated w/the "fulie" heads.

And you will need steep gears/loose converter w/a 2004R or wide ratio 4-speed.

Changing just the cam to something less radical (something like the Comp 262, as an example) would be a move in the right direction, if you were to do nothing else, IMHO.

Good luck.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-27-2009, 07:09 PM
fortkenter fortkenter is offline
Registered User
 

Last journal entry: Starting Off
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Bristol,ct
Posts: 7
Wiki Edits: 0

I did not build this motor but i have the documentation from when it was put together and when things were added so i pretty much know what i have but this motor has about 3500 miles on it and have not had any trouble yet. I'm sure they checked clearances. are you sure you were configured right??
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-27-2009, 07:15 PM
fortkenter fortkenter is offline
Registered User
 

Last journal entry: Starting Off
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Bristol,ct
Posts: 7
Wiki Edits: 0

well cobalt327 that cam i listed is not in the motor (everything else is) i listed this cam because the comp tech line said this is the one i need. The cam right now is a 286 ho6 Way too big!! A lot of guys want those heads. should i sell them and if so what should i put on it??
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-27-2009, 07:25 PM
cobalt327's Avatar
cobalt327 cobalt327 is offline
WFO
 
Last wiki edit: Intake manifold
Last journal entry: 1980 Malibu Wagon
Last photo:
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Atlanta
Age: 57
Posts: 15,649
Wiki Edits: 1,616

Personally, I like the double hump heads, too. I like the way they run, and have zero problems w/them- except when on a small displacement engine.

Unless you're "married" to that particular short block, I think that switching it out for a 350 (I know, everyone has one- but there's a reason for that ), you will really enjoy the combination, as long as a cam is chosen to compliment the CR.

A 350 will be a beast, compared to the 283.

I'm kinda at a loss as to why that cam would be Comp's recommendation, unless I'm missing something (a distinct possibility, BTW). What's the specs on that cam, if you have them?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-27-2009, 07:33 PM
fortkenter fortkenter is offline
Registered User
 

Last journal entry: Starting Off
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Bristol,ct
Posts: 7
Wiki Edits: 0

The cam that is in it Intake 102 exhaust 110 duration 230 advance duration 286
the one they recommend I'm not sure but the pn is 249-cl12-238-2
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-27-2009, 07:59 PM
cobalt327's Avatar
cobalt327 cobalt327 is offline
WFO
 
Last wiki edit: Intake manifold
Last journal entry: 1980 Malibu Wagon
Last photo:
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Atlanta
Age: 57
Posts: 15,649
Wiki Edits: 1,616

Quote:
the pn is 249-cl12-238-2
Turns out that cam is: Xtreme Energy XE262H Hydraulic Flat Tappet Camshaft Only
Lift: .462''/.469''
Duration: 262°/270°
RPM Range: 1300-5600

That coincides w/what I had recommended earlier- "(something like the Comp 262, as an example)", I thought the advertised duration numbers were 283/289, which would put the duration @ 0.050" higher than what the 262 cam is.

That cam would be about as good as it gets w/your current combo.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-27-2009, 08:08 PM
fortkenter fortkenter is offline
Registered User
 

Last journal entry: Starting Off
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Bristol,ct
Posts: 7
Wiki Edits: 0

performance and reliability wise what are your thoughts. still too mismatched or will this be reasonable. I also intend on installing a stage 2 700r4 and 3.55 gearset. ???????????
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-27-2009, 08:16 PM
cobalt327's Avatar
cobalt327 cobalt327 is offline
WFO
 
Last wiki edit: Intake manifold
Last journal entry: 1980 Malibu Wagon
Last photo:
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Atlanta
Age: 57
Posts: 15,649
Wiki Edits: 1,616

I think that cam will be as good of a match for your combo as you are likely to get, and that gear/tranny combo will help matters, at least at take-off. You will still be pulling a 2.6-something rear gear when locked up in OD, though. But that's less of a problem than it sounds like, because (thankfully) the tranny shifts out of OD as soon as you add throttle to it at cruise.
Reply With Quote
Back to top


Recent Engine posts with photos


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads for: "283 questions"
ThreadThread StarterForumRepliesLast Post
1940 Ford pickup box and door questions?SkimanHotrodding Basics1004-04-2011 05:50 PM
700R4 to '58 283 flexplate and starterStevekantercoolEngine401-11-2009 11:18 PM
Suspension-Brakes-Steering Common QuestionsJonSuspension - Brakes - Steering010-16-2003 03:19 PM
Questions, questions, questions?slider in waTransmission - Rearend209-27-2003 02:01 PM
stock 283 questionsBlobEngine309-08-2003 04:56 AM



Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:36 AM.
Copyright Hotrodders.com 1999 - 2012. All Rights Reserved.