Hotrodders Bulletin Board Hotrodders Bulletin Board
Home · Bulletin Board · Project Journals · Tech Article Wiki · Knowledge Base · Photo Gallery · Classifieds · Company Reviews · Calendar · T-Shirts


Thanks!Thanks Streetbeasts lawsuit donors!thanks
See the full list of donors helping to protect free speech.

We're winning the case!
Get the latest update on the lawsuit, see the original lawsuit post, or read the article Streetbeasts doesn't want you to see.

Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Unanswered Posts
Hotrodders Bulletin Board > Tech Help > Engine
User Name
Password
lost password?   |   register now


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #106  
Old 12-20-2006, 05:02 PM
automotive breath's Avatar
automotive breath automotive breath is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 658
Wiki Edits: 0

I like the discussion about detonation and testing an engines detonation limits. I do most of my testing at the drag strip, with my combination detonation shows up first at the launch. It's easy to be unaware of it because of the noise and as piston speed goes up the problem can quickly go away. If it's severe enough it comes back when I put it in high gear, piston speed goes down, VE is very high and the engine is heavily loaded.

One of the problems I have with testing detonation limits is when I find something that works and the detonation goes away I then must find a way too raise the compression while maintaining the same basic configuration before resuming testing.

Another confusing issue is when combustion is improved ignition advance requirements are less. Both the modification and the new timing settings reduce detonation, and then you have to tear it down, raise compression with out changing critical specifications and start over.

Anyway people locally want grooves in their cylinder heads, here's some of the projects I'm working on






Last edited by automotive breath : 12-20-2006 at 05:23 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #107  
Old 12-20-2006, 05:50 PM
QuenchPiston QuenchPiston is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 209
Wiki Edits: 0

[QUOTE=automotive breath]I like the discussion about detonation and testing an engines detonation limits. I do most of my testing at the drag strip, with my combination detonation shows up first at the launch. It's easy to be unaware of it because of the noise and as piston speed goes up the problem can quickly go away. If it's severe enough it comes back when I put it in high gear, piston speed goes down, VE is very high and the engine is heavily loaded.

One of the problems I have with testing detonation limits is when I find something that works and the detonation goes away I then must find a way too raise the compression while maintaining the same basic configuration before resuming testing.

Another confusing issue is when combustion is improved ignition advance requirements are less. Both the modification and the new timing settings reduce detonation, and then you have to tear it down, raise compression with out changing critical specifications and start over.
QUOTE]

Interesting. Not everyone has access to a dyno but any one of us can put some mufflers on the exhaust and either run it down the drag strip or up a steep hill with a rubber hose and Styrofoam cup on the end of it placed close to the engine to listen for detonation.
Your right about the ignition advance, the better the combustion becomes the less advance you need up to a certain point, I was reading something like 15 degrees is around the minimum.
Another interesting thing about efficient combustion and Nox levels is the Oldsmobile engine. I read that the reason it was the last American V8 to remain carburetor was because of of its efficient and flat combustion chamber. However if you ever saw an Olds combustion chamber it is huge. Of course there are reasons why the chamber worked.
One more thing, I don't think those grooves are adding that much more surface area to the chamber to add to the causes of detonation.
Reply With Quote
  #108  
Old 12-20-2006, 08:18 PM
redlightning redlightning is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: TN
Age: 44
Posts: 990
Wiki Edits: 0

Looking at the first picture in post 106.I can see where the grooves come toward the valves.There are four points.I would think these points would get hot and stay hot.Right across is the spark plug.I wonder if the reason you are seeing a decrease in your detonation is because the four points are staying hot and igniting the mixture more evenly along with the spark plug.In other words instead of detonation knocking the piston sideways the four points are remaining hot and almost igniting it from both sides.Or do you guys feel they would not remain hot enough?
Reply With Quote
  #109  
Old 12-20-2006, 10:16 PM
Rick WI Rick WI is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 1,887
Wiki Edits: 0

Quote:
Originally Posted by redlightning
Looking at the first picture in post 106.I can see where the grooves come toward the valves.There are four points.I would think these points would get hot and stay hot.Right across is the spark plug.I wonder if the reason you are seeing a decrease in your detonation is because the four points are staying hot and igniting the mixture more evenly along with the spark plug.In other words instead of detonation knocking the piston sideways the four points are remaining hot and almost igniting it from both sides.Or do you guys feel they would not remain hot enough?


That would not make sense. With those areas getting hot they would promote preignition.
Reply With Quote
  #110  
Old 12-21-2006, 09:54 AM
johnsongrass1's Avatar
johnsongrass1 johnsongrass1 is offline
Race it, Don't rice it!
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Columbia, Mo
Age: 33
Posts: 3,838
Wiki Edits: 0

I think we need to define detonation and preignition.

Detonation: When a ember or heat generated from compressed gasses begins to burn the A/F instead of the plug initiating the flame. Sometimes detonation can happen when gasses on the other side of the chamber begin to burn the A/F and then the plug fires, creating another flame from that collides. This is very uncontrolled.

Preigntion, Anytime the A/f is burned before the plug initiates the sequence. Controlled but at the wrong time.


Turbulence helps by creating a "draft" that helps cool the hot spots.

Turbulence will not help Preigniton.


The only way to reliably test detonation is with EGT's and knock sensors. Drag strips are to varied in atmosphere and track conditions. Fuel, timing devices, wind speeds, all have an effect. You aren't controlling your control. Negating any reasonable testing. Since your are finding positive results with your grooving, I'd be looking at other things that might cause a similar result. Don't wear blinders...
Reply With Quote
  #111  
Old 12-21-2006, 10:29 AM
QuenchPiston QuenchPiston is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 209
Wiki Edits: 0

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnsongrass1
I think we need to define detonation and preignition.

Detonation: When a ember or heat generated from compressed gasses begins to burn the A/F instead of the plug initiating the flame. Sometimes detonation can happen when gasses on the other side of the chamber begin to burn the A/F and then the plug fires, creating another flame from that collides. This is very uncontrolled.

.


That definition sounds a little crossed up. First detonation is spontaneous. Detonation always happens after the the spark plug initiates normal combustion. You are correct with the heat or ember (I will assume by ember you mean perhaps a hot exhaust valve, hot spot in the combustion chamber within the head or piston top/crown. Now your example of "Sometimes detonation can happen when gasses on the other side of the chamber begin to burn the A/F and then the plug fires, creating another flame from that collides." belongs in your pre ignition definition. Thats not detonation. Also pressure can cause detonation. The main thing you want to remember is that detonation occurs "after" the spark plug propagates normal combustion.
Reply With Quote
  #112  
Old 12-21-2006, 11:36 AM
QuenchPiston QuenchPiston is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 209
Wiki Edits: 0

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnsongrass1


Turbulence helps by creating a "draft" that helps cool the hot spots.

Turbulence will not help Preigniton.


The only way to reliably test detonation is with EGT's and knock sensors. Drag strips are to varied in atmosphere and track conditions. Fuel, timing devices, wind speeds, all have an effect. You aren't controlling your control. Negating any reasonable testing. Since your are finding positive results with your grooving, I'd be looking at other things that might cause a similar result. Don't wear blinders...


I am not sure what you mean by turbulence creating a draft. As far as I know turbulence is caused by the intake port/system or by the rapid decrease in volume near a quench area.
As far as testing with a EGT or knock sensor that would be out of the budget of most people here since you would need a data acquisition system therefore a drag strip is the closest controlled testing ground most average blue collar workers have to test at.
If the guy has everything else the same except the grooves, what or where else should he look to that is causing his results?
I kind of think the guy took his blinders off and tried something in left or right field and it is working for him.
Reply With Quote
  #113  
Old 12-21-2006, 12:07 PM
Classix_Lover's Avatar
Classix_Lover Classix_Lover is offline
Music soothes the soul
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: League City, TX
Age: 21
Posts: 587
Wiki Edits: 0

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnsongrass1
I think we need to define detonation and preignition.

Detonation: When a ember or heat generated from compressed gasses begins to burn the A/F instead of the plug initiating the flame. Sometimes detonation can happen when gasses on the other side of the chamber begin to burn the A/F and then the plug fires, creating another flame from that collides. This is very uncontrolled.

Preigntion, Anytime the A/f is burned before the plug initiates the sequence. Controlled but at the wrong time.



I doubt this'll clear up the issue considering the fact that both of those definitions sound exactly the same.
Reply With Quote
  #114  
Old 12-21-2006, 12:33 PM
johnsongrass1's Avatar
johnsongrass1 johnsongrass1 is offline
Race it, Don't rice it!
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Columbia, Mo
Age: 33
Posts: 3,838
Wiki Edits: 0

Perhaps that was a little dumbed down. I meant only to clarify the terms.

I might agree that timed runs are a distant second to dyno runs but if if the changes are small and minute, than with any kind of variable, the results are affected. My small list of variables are already posted.

Judgement results, and that all we have with timed runs, because of the variable involved, are often skewed because a person opinion greatly influences what they feel. Circumstantial evidence at best.
Reply With Quote
  #115  
Old 12-21-2006, 01:38 PM
automotive breath's Avatar
automotive breath automotive breath is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 658
Wiki Edits: 0

johnsongrass1,

As pointed out by others, your understanding of pre-ignition and detonation are very weak and full of inaccuracies. In addition you have no understanding of the testing I perform, how well I control variables and what benefit the testing provides.

IMO you are not in a position to make statements like “don't wear blinders”.
Reply With Quote
  #116  
Old 12-21-2006, 02:35 PM
bigbadbowtie's Avatar
bigbadbowtie bigbadbowtie is offline
Bottle Fed
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Huntsville Alabama
Age: 36
Posts: 470
Wiki Edits: 0


Reply With Quote
  #117  
Old 12-21-2006, 03:07 PM
QuenchPiston QuenchPiston is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 209
Wiki Edits: 0

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnsongrass1
Perhaps that was a little dumbed down. I meant only to clarify the terms.

I might agree that timed runs are a distant second to dyno runs but if if the changes are small and minute, than with any kind of variable, the results are affected. My small list of variables are already posted.

.

Can you tell me the post number so I can read over those variables?
Reply With Quote
  #118  
Old 12-21-2006, 03:24 PM
Rick WI Rick WI is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 1,887
Wiki Edits: 0

It is very simple and very easy to dumb down. This isn't rocket science.

Detonation, a collision of flame fronts in the combustion chamber.

Pre ignition, ignition occurs prior to spark.
Reply With Quote
  #119  
Old 12-21-2006, 03:52 PM
automotive breath's Avatar
automotive breath automotive breath is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 658
Wiki Edits: 0

Here's a quote from another forum, this member has a very clear understanding of combustion, detonation, pre-ignition and the importance of turbulence during the combustion process.

Quote:

Spark ignition (SI) engines all work on the principle of a turbulent flame front (TFF) consuming the air-fuel charge. A normal combustion event would be considered one where the spark ignites the air fuel mixture (a complex process in itself) and the flame propagates throughout the air-fuel mixture with this turbulent flame front. Skip the next paragraph if you know how stuff burns

I think most people have a pretty good idea of how a TFF works, but let’s go through some of the details. First, think of a chamber (say a cube or a disc for simplicity) full of nice calm, still air-fuel mixture. A spark in the middle ignites, and begins to consume the mixture. Ideally, the flame front (in this case a laminar flame front, since the mixture is still) would form a spherical shell, as it progresses. Now, this flame front is propelled by a couple of forces. First, the mixture in the wake of the flame front is obviously heated by the combustion. This heat translates to an increase in pressure. This higher pressure burned gas compresses the mixture ahead of the flame front. Since the volume of the burned gases expands it helps accelerate the flame front. Think of blowing up a balloon. The compression of the end gas also raises its temperature. Flame speeds are higher in higher temperature mixtures.

For a turbulent flame front, consider instead of a calm chamber, a chamber full of turbulent eddies, of all size scales. As the flame front approaches one of these swirling eddies, the flame edge is 'torn' and spun around by the eddy, into fresh mixture. This helps to shred up the flame front, and helps to progress the burn of the mixture. In short, this is really why SI engines work at all, lol.

Now, this burning action is really a race. As you compress the combustible end gas, you get ever closer to the auto-ignition temperature. Auto-ignition is a process by where a series of branching chemical reactions (which mainly all have a very strong dependence on temperature) result in the combustion of a mixture, with no flame front. These reactions begin to oxide the mixture simply due to the thermal energy available from the high temperature. Now don't get me wrong, this is a VERY complex series of chemical reactions, but some of the basics help give a good understanding.

The auto-ignition is very dependent on the time history of the mixture. If you hold the mixture at a low temperature, it may not auto-ignite for a long time. Raise the temperature, and it ignites sooner. So if the TFF takes a long time consuming the mixture, the compression effects of the TFF are present for a longer time and hence the temp. of the end gas is higher for longer.

If the end gas does auto-ignite before the TFF reaches it, or before the relatively cool cylinder wall quenches the flame, the end gas auto-ignites, or detonates. Now, if one corner of this chamber is the last to receive the flame front, and indeed does detonate, what is the result? The auto-igniting mixture essentially 'explodes' and sends a pressure wave across the chamber at the local speed of sound in the cylinder. This pressure wave is what is heard as 'knock' Oddly enough your ear picks up short pulses of a tone, as a 'knock', and not a ringing sound.
Reply With Quote
  #120  
Old 12-21-2006, 06:00 PM
automotive breath's Avatar
automotive breath automotive breath is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 658
Wiki Edits: 0

Earlier I mentioned one of the cars that is running grooved cylinder heads.

It's important for people to understand I am not claming the grooves are the only reason this car runs well. The modification is one of many things that were done to this car and engine to improve performance.

It's a late 80's Camaro with a 355 SBC and a T350. Last time out the weather was good and the car was working great, here's the times it ran.

60 ft. 1.299
330ft 3.997
1/8 6.258
Mph 108.63
1000 ft 8.221
1/4 9.895
Mph 134.22

My involvement was porting the dart heads and cutting the grooves, the remainder of the combination was the work of the owner. Here,s some pictures:





If you look in the background the blue dodge is running grooved 340X heads, and I'm porting and grooving a set of SBF edelbroock heads for the yellow truck, I'll post pictures later.

Last edited by automotive breath : 12-21-2006 at 06:08 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply
Back to top


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads for: "Singh's Grooves in Ported & Milled vortec heads on stock 350"
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stock 350 with 305 truck heads? CrazyT Engine 3 08-04-2009 01:15 PM
vortec vs phase 2 heads 71vegagt Engine 3 01-29-2006 05:12 AM
Exclusive parts for Vortec heads mgray Engine 1 10-16-2003 06:38 PM
Collection of Ported Vortec Heads (pics) Ken-96GMC K1500 SC Engine 2 06-08-2003 04:00 PM
350 heads or 305 H.O. heads????? crshrmn3 Engine 3 08-25-2002 08:51 PM



Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 2.3.2 © 2005, Crawlability, Inc.
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:55 PM.
Copyright Hotrodders.com 1999 - 2009. All Rights Reserved.