Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board - View Single Post - Smaller cam for 383 chevy?????'s
View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 07-27-2009, 08:04 PM
cobalt327's Avatar
cobalt327 cobalt327 is offline
Last wiki edit: Intake manifold
Last journal entry: 1980 Malibu Wagon
Last photo:
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,031
Wiki Edits: 1616

Thanks: 128
Thanked 616 Times in 565 Posts
Originally Posted by mupton
First of all I would like to think the folks that helped me out on the ZZ4 cam ?'s I had.The 96 long block I was going to use turned out to be trashed.So I'm back to replacing the broke crank in my 383.I'm now in the process of having it replaced.I would like to go to a smaller cam,than the XE268 I'm running now.My setup is vortec heads,9.7 to 1 comp,performer intake,600 carb,hei,headers,2.5inch duals.The motor ran very well with the XE268,but I would like to pickup more low end torque.I know that sometimes when using a smaller cam that you can raise the cylinder pressure to much.I'm trying to stay away from that.I don't care about max horsepower or a lopey idle anymore,I just want to build more lowend torque.This is my transportation on the weekends,just normal truck stuff.Hauling 2x4's,plywood,mulch for the wifes flower bed,and every now and then pulling a 16ft trailor with diesel tractor and bushog 200 miles one way to the hunting camp.I'm wondering if I should go with one of the CC4x4 cams or maybe one of the smaller Voodoo cams.Maybe the 262 or the 256(maybe incorrect on this cam)Vodoo cams.I figure what I lose in hp on the top I can gain back in tq on the bottom.Thanks for the help!
Personally, I would consider the smaller cams if the rear gear ratio was less than optimum- like low 3's or high 2's, and/or OD tranny and/or tall rear tires. You would notice the increased torque especially when taxing the truck- pulling the loaded trailer, for example.

Otherwise, I would stick w/the 268 cam.

Good luck.
Reply With Quote