red65mustang said:
Jon is in court because the written negative Street Beast info was broadcast on the entire net...
SWRNC now has the same right to sue HR.com because this "suspension" thread info was broadcast over the entire net and will do harm to his business reputation and he will incur costs to correct his business reputation...
Did you ever stop and think that "maybe" it was his motive for posting from the beginning....
He did give credentials to prove his business reputation on the thread in question and carefully worded his posts to read that he was here only to offer help on Street Beasts cars problems "at no charge"....
When asked to behave within the rules he did!!!!
he may have carefully worded his rant against woodz' to get a "broadcast" reaction response from the administration....
(I do hope I am wrong!!!)
I know for a fact that Barry was consulting his attorneys starting about a year ago about this board for what he could say...
Barry does have a earlier dated moderators complaint thread to show "just cause" against dingers thread and 4jaw...
that is why I asked for apologies and for the dump!!!
my $.02 bottem line:
you are further irritating already angry frustrated people with these "public hanging" threads...
it is going to bite you in the arse one of these days!!!
I read these public "suspension" threads notices as you are walking on very thin legal ice!!!!
YES the moderator's should take action against mis-conduct (privately)
it's clear to me based on the moderator responses that I have wasted my time on this thread and the Barry suspension thread so I will shut up....
Jon is in court because of
alleged libel , once it it shown in that the
alleged libelous statements were in fact previously known truthful statements, brought in from other sources, including court documents, available to the public, it will probably be found that there is no basis for a lawsuit.
swrnc came here, violated rules, and was suspended per our posted guidelines. This is just news, nothing more. The people have a right to know. Those who wish to remain ignorant of what is going on in the media in which they choose to participate are free to not look. This is not a public club, we can and will refuse service to anyone who willfully disregards the rules.
Should someone in the general public see how a busnessman behaves while representing his own company? I think so.
All of that which was done on our part is truthful and has nothing to do with his business. His own statements display the type of businessman he is...
He joined and then willfully disregarded our guidelines,(which he had to agree to before he joined), and was given the appropriate disiplinary action..
You are not a lawyer, yet you "see" libel, slander, and or defamation of character.
I therefore assume, suppose and opine that because I percieve you to continually assume, then write things that can be proven to be merely a matter of perception, and keep on repeating them, that hotrodders.com could sue you as well.
The fact that this type of thread has been posted before should be enough to demonstrate that it is within the adminstration's rights to do so.. You do not want to accept what you have been shown, and it is of my opinion that at this point, nothing will get you to change your opinion.
Your posted a link to a company that specializes in spinning online appearances. In my honest opinion, they appear to use methods that are less than honorable, and I could also conclude that they are very competent when it comes to filing SLAPP lawsuits, which are filed to induce a chilling effect on the free speech of those not web savvy enough to know that there is no legal merit to many of those type of lawsuits.
You sought out and posted a link that company....That action on your part, while not against any guidelines, could cause me to assume and be of the opinion that you approve of the action that Streetbeasts is taking against Jon and Hotrodders.com.
Now, is what I just wrote libelous? Slanderous? Intent to defame your character?
Later, mikey