are they all hype???? - Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board
Hotrodders.com -- Hot Rod Forum



Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Unanswered Posts Auto Escrow Insurance Auto Loans
Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board > Tech Help> Engine
User Name
Password
lost password?   |   register now

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-04-2008, 04:19 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 71
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
are they all hype????

Ok guys my 383 has a edelbrock rpm performer top end package. If I just change the heads to afr 195 street will I get a noticeable HP gain over the 170 edelbrocks. Went to a car show with 700 plus entrants this weekend and could not find one person with AFRs to pick there brain, what do you think? I'd like to get more torque and HP with better heads. Or are afrs just a major publicity game with all the magazine editors? Thanks for the help.

    Advertisement
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-04-2008, 04:39 PM
coldknock's Avatar
Member
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Social Circle, Ga.
Age: 43
Posts: 1,531
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
The gain in power will depend on how much of a limiting factor your current heads are. Post detailed info of the entire combination of parts and we might be able to give you a rough estimate.




Larry
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-04-2008, 05:13 PM
curtis73's Avatar
Hates: Liver. Loves: Diesel
 
Last wiki edit: How to find cheap parts
Last journal entry: Found an LQ9 today
Last photo:
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Carlisle, PA
Age: 41
Posts: 5,297
Wiki Edits: 16

Thanks: 20
Thanked 20 Times in 15 Posts
I'm personally not a fan of AFR heads. Some of them are fine, but they were state of the art in 1985, but they haven't improved them really. They use old chevy port designs and CNC port them with old plots that don't really make use of modern port technology. As a result they typically need big ports to flow big numbers and the result is poor low end performance. The AFR 180s I had on a Firebird LT1 were VERY soggy down low. They also inflate their flow numbers by a good margin. On a flow bench they don't move as much air as advertised.

I guess what I'm saying is, you can do better. Aftermarket heads are great beefy things, but you can usually achieve the same flow with less port volume and the same money with a top notch CNC porting service. For instance, I'm sending some factory aluminum LT1 heads to a respected LT1 porter. When they come back they'll be 180cc runners that flow 260 cfm. That's as good as AFR's 195 cc runner's actual flow. Plus, mine will have CNC profiled chambers, F1-spec 5.1 valve job, fully assembled with larger Manley race valves, beehive springs, titanium retainers, ARP rocker studs, custom bosses added for perimeter bolt valve covers, all for $1700. Expensive, yes, but when you compare it to aftermarket heads its a bargain.

Companies like Edelbrock, Trick Flow, and AFR specialize in high performance bolt-on street heads. They're fine, but nothing to write home about in my opinion. Companies like Dart, Brodix, and others tend to produce either entry level heads that flow so-so, or massive race heads. The smaller heads are designed for race classes where "stock" head types are required, then the racers port the snot out of them, but out of the box they aren't that impressive. The bigger heads are a no-compromise huge port flow game.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-04-2008, 06:04 PM
coldknock's Avatar
Member
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Social Circle, Ga.
Age: 43
Posts: 1,531
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Curtis, That's a bargain for the parts you're getting plus a complete port job.

Any good builder will give the engine all the airflow it needs to make the most of the combination of parts he has to work with, and not a bit more. As far as flowbenches are concerned, I've seen reductions in airflow numbers after cleaning up the quality of the airflow. This resulted in a gain in power. How's that for a monkeywrench in the flow numbers game?

Airflow comparisons from bench to bench are almost useless unless both benches used the same standards for calibration, and then only if all other variables are measured and taken into account. The size and shape of the clay at the port entry can make a 5% difference in flow numbers so don't take them with a grain of salt. The only thing that matters is the end result.

Horsepower.

All of the companies you mentioned produce heads that do make very healthy amounts of power when combined with the right parts on the right engine. Other companies like All Pro, Profiler, and CHI make extraordinary cylinder heads that can make huge power right out of the box. It's a matter of choosing the correct parts to use ALL of the avaliable airflow, not just a portion of it. That's how efficient power is made.

Anywho, to make a short story long, we can't really answer the fellas questuon until we know what he's working with.



Larry
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-04-2008, 07:30 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 71
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
F bird is correct I'm using edelbrock cam hydraulic 233/244 at .50 488/510 lift on 112lsa. The heads have 170 runners 64cc chambers, air gap intake, 750 speed demon, 1.5 roller rockers. I don't want to chase a hp number and lose all my driveability just a tire shredder 450-500 torque if possible. Current combo is 323rwhp I can't let the old ladies rousch mustang spank the good old 67 camaro, you know I'll never hear the end of it. Anyways I've read the heads won't allow a 1.6 rockers so lift is limited bt the rpms. thanks for the continuing help
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 05-04-2008, 07:46 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 71
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
forgot to add

I did talk to comp cams and they did suggest a xe284h it has 240/246 at.050 .507/.510 on 110lsa but this was with the afr heads not the edelbrocks. I didn't want to yank motor unless I had to!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 05-04-2008, 07:55 PM
curtis73's Avatar
Hates: Liver. Loves: Diesel
 
Last wiki edit: How to find cheap parts
Last journal entry: Found an LQ9 today
Last photo:
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Carlisle, PA
Age: 41
Posts: 5,297
Wiki Edits: 16

Thanks: 20
Thanked 20 Times in 15 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by coldknock
Curtis, That's a bargain for the parts you're getting plus a complete port job.
I even forgot to mention it comes with a matched cam.

Quote:
Any good builder will give the engine all the airflow it needs to make the most of the combination of parts he has to work with, and not a bit more. As far as flowbenches are concerned, I've seen reductions in airflow numbers after cleaning up the quality of the airflow. This resulted in a gain in power. How's that for a monkeywrench in the flow numbers game?
Amen. Flow does not equal dyno, and even if it did, we don't race dynos. Quality is more important than quantity.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 05-04-2008, 10:03 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 71
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
[QUOTE=F-BIRD'88]Forget the chassis dyno numbers and take your car to the track and see what it will do. With some sticky tires. Then open the exhaust and try it. The dyno numbers (from a chassis dyno) don't mean squat.
Those heads are not limited in rocker ratio. Don't know where you got that.
Rockers, by them selves won't help. (+/- a few horses.)
If you want more torque you need a different camshaft and improve the exhaust system (scavedging and flow). New heads or ported head won;t do squat if the exhaust system sucks.
Possibly a single pattern cam with tight LSA 236-236 240-240ish duration 106-108LSA on 102 to 104 intake C/L and high lift.
What trans torque converter are you using. What gear ratio?
Your ignition advance curve probabily -most likely needs work.
Go to the track and get a MPH on the car. It will tell you how much power you're making.Need more info on the engine and car. compression ratio etc etc.[/QUOTE


I'm using a th400 with a 10 inch 3000 stall and a davis unified ignition hei with 12 degrees initial and 24 degrees coming in at 3000rpm for 36. This may be the puss way of 1/4 mile time but the best pass with a G tech ran 12.45 at 116mph in 3500lb 67 camaro with 3.90 gears. I'm definately not concerned of making changes to combo just want to get it right, and I probably over analzye everything. Exhaust is 1 3/4 long tube hookers with 2.5 exhaust h-pipe and spin tech mufflers hopefully it breaths well.



]
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 05-04-2008, 10:24 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 1,885
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
The Edelbrock RPM is a nice head and has a decent combustion chamber, although not the latest tech. If you went to an AFR head you'd want to go to the 195 and you'll gain almost 60 CFM at peak. You'll have flow gains throughout the lift in fact. You will gain a much better combustion chamber, lighter valves and all the latest trick and trinkets. If you can get a decent price for your old heads, would be a decent upgrade.

Curtis, after using these heads since the early mid 90's I have not found anything you said to be true, either on the flowbench or on the track. I'm suspecting you have no first hand experience with these heads.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 05-04-2008, 10:43 PM
curtis73's Avatar
Hates: Liver. Loves: Diesel
 
Last wiki edit: How to find cheap parts
Last journal entry: Found an LQ9 today
Last photo:
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Carlisle, PA
Age: 41
Posts: 5,297
Wiki Edits: 16

Thanks: 20
Thanked 20 Times in 15 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick WI
Curtis, after using these heads since the early mid 90's I have not found anything you said to be true, either on the flowbench or on the track. I'm suspecting you have no first hand experience with these heads.
I've had close personal experience with three sets of AFR heads. I had some 195s on a 95 F-body, briefly a set of 180s on a 96 B-body, and I built an AFR-headed LT1 motor for my friend's firebird. All three were VERY disappointing, on the dyno, the flowbench, and the track. The CNC porting was terrible, in spots missing the walls entirely, in other places biting off too much causing galling of the aluminum. One set was shipped to me with a crack beside a guide and they refused to replace it. I called, they refused to replace it, told me to get a lawyer and then hung up the phone on me. So I got a lawyer and got them replaced. All of a sudden they were my best friends. I called their bluff and after they received a letter from a lawyer they caved like a sand castle in the surf.

I made the mistake of trusting their advertising, then I made the mistake of using their heads. I was disappointed all three times. Don't get me wrong... the heads aren't terrible. They flow respectably, but they don't really have anything special about them. I'll be getting the same flow from 15cc less runner for $800 cheaper with my porter, so I don't see what all the love is for. Sure AFR heads are fine. The company sucks, but the heads are vaguely respectable. I just recommend against them because you can get so much more quality for less money elsewhere.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-2008, 12:10 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 1,885
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
I guess I have to say, and end my part of the discussion with I don't believe it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-2008, 03:53 AM
curtis73's Avatar
Hates: Liver. Loves: Diesel
 
Last wiki edit: How to find cheap parts
Last journal entry: Found an LQ9 today
Last photo:
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Carlisle, PA
Age: 41
Posts: 5,297
Wiki Edits: 16

Thanks: 20
Thanked 20 Times in 15 Posts
I think most wouldn't believe it, but having lived within 10 miles of AFR's facility for the last almost decade, been to their facility a dozen times, having been disappointed by three sets of their heads, and been told by their employees that in order to get non-cracked heads I need to hire a lawyer, I think I can authoritatively speak on my opinion of the company and their product.

Also, numbers don't lie. I'm not sure why anyone would spend $2500 for a 265 cfm 195cc AFR head when they can get 260 cfm from a 180 cc ported head for $1700. I just don't subscribe to the hype and propoganda. I DO subscribe to a respected porting company who has countless timeslips to represent their product. AFR has knowingly inflated their flow numbers, their port shapes and contours are based on nearly 20 year old designs as I personally verified by touring their shop and personally seeing their CNC machine.

They just don't do it for me. Call me grassroots, but when I'm looking at the best bang for the buck, it becomes pretty obvious. $2500 for a huge-port race head that flows street/strip numbers, or a ported street head that flows race numbers for $1700. No contest.

Even if NONE of my story were true, you can't ignore the numbers. Forget the poor customer service or my dyno time... I can't accept the flow/port size/cost ratio calculation with AFR heads. The bottom line is that they need a lot more port volume to generate the same flow as other heads, and to add insult to injury, their numbers tend to be inflated.

We can agree to disagree, but the verifiable numbers are clearly published all over the internet. I respect your love for AFR, I just interpret the data differently.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-2008, 08:03 AM
Stroke Meister
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: MI, USA
Posts: 703
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
This is going to be a pissing match. AFR backs there product and will fix or replace anything found defective. Some people are brand loyal - you won't get a Brodix guy buying AFR's or vice-versa. Most aftermarket head mfrs (domestic) do not sell junk, although there is always the possibility of something. As with any product, they should always be checked and inspected for problems before installation. JMO
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-2008, 08:04 AM
Member
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Lakeland FL
Age: 66
Posts: 4,110
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
your ignition timing for that cam and heads is way off the mark....

you are loosing very likely 30HP+ and 40TQ+....

track testing will tell you the best combo for your particular car but this will get you atleast into the ballpark for that cam...

http://www.vetteclub.org/technicalti...t%20Timing.pdf

LOL...with 12base in at 3,000...yup! the old lady would spank your butt!!!
(unless you do launch at 3,000+)

Last edited by red65mustang; 05-05-2008 at 08:51 AM.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-2008, 07:27 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 71
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Guys thanks for the suggestions but I'm actually getting a little confused now. First of all it sounds like I may be able to take my current combo do some porting and get some results. Problem is in my area central Missouri I do not know of any reputable cylinder porting services so if you guys no of a expert please let me know. Two with the timing I always thought your normal high performance street engine liked 12-16 degrees initial timing and then all come in at 2600-3200rpm with 34-40 total maybe I'm wrong. Again this will be a weekend cruiser just wanted the extra grunt.To be totally honest I'm looking fort any 383 combos thats working for you guys or something real similar. I'm getting bored with current engine combination and thought if I was to change weather it would be head, cam( even thinking maybe retro fit roller) , or a combination of components i'd find some new found interest. Most likely what ever I decide my good friend who has been a mechanic all his life will help in the assembly, just trying to cover all bases. Again thanks for your time. Also I had a crane cam tech ask me what the cranking compression was, so with out proper instruction I got a compression gauge checked 3 cylinders and readings were 185 to 200. I did not know I had to remove all spark plugs so readings were no good, but I still didn't understand why he wanted to know this info. What's the story behind his question?

Last edited by neverfastenuff; 05-05-2008 at 07:37 PM.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Recent Engine posts with photos

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name (usually not your first and last name), your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Annular boosters - the real deal or marketing hype? Mad Maggot Engine 18 11-22-2009 04:13 PM
QuietCar Sound deadener real or hype? Choir Boy Jon General Rodding Tech 4 04-10-2008 09:07 PM
Marketing {hype} Ole JIM Hotrodders' Lounge 25 08-25-2006 05:51 PM
Cast or hyperutectic pistons Novaman78 Engine 36 02-01-2005 10:25 PM
Oil additives, hype or truth? 4 Jaw Chuck Engine 11 03-17-2003 10:14 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright Hotrodders.com 1999 - 2012. All Rights Reserved.