![]() |
|
|
|
|||||
|
I think I would start with a chalk outline on the floor of the garage. I would use real wheels to see how it would fit in with my design. What kind of pickup is it?
|
|
|||||
|
If you are using 2X4 tubing, how will you run your brake lines and wiring? Channel would be easier to work with and provide you a place to run your lines. Crossmembers would be easier to to mount. 2x4 tubing is used more by production frame shops that have mandrell benders to work the metal, ie Chris Aston Chassis.
Does the pickup that you have require a kickup rear frame or a straight frame to carry the lines of the body? Check out my gallery pictures on Pg 89 and see a picture there titled "LIFT CLEARANCE" to see the underside of my '40 Ford P/u and how the channel works for you. Also see Pg 75. Last edited by alittle1; 05-12-2008 at 08:15 PM. |
|
||||||
|
Take a look at Cboy's journal and look at mine to get some ideas of where to start and how to lay it out..I hope you have your rear and front axles on hand as well as the body you intend to use as you need them to take off measurements from// BTW I would up using 2x6 tube and am glad I did as it gave me some more room for things like mufflers and such..
Sam
__________________
I have tried most all of it and now do what is known to work.. Last edited by OneMoreTime; 05-12-2008 at 08:16 PM. Reason: additional info |
|
|||||
|
'34 sheet metal will require you to pinch the frame in front and the open flared front fenders will show a lot of the chassis and suspension, which can get really ugly. A straight frame will give you lots of height, if that what you are going for. The kick up at the rear will bring it back down to more realistic proportion.
|
|
|||||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||||
|
Quote:
I also picked up a set of craigars mounted on slicks and the front wheels mounted on nothing for $20 and there was my 2 holly carbs for $5 a piece and I used one for spare parts and the other is working great.
|
|
||||||
|
Quote:
Besides the clunky looks, just about everything on the mini pickup chassis will turn out to be in the wrong place including the steering box, steering arms and steering column as well as the front crossmember which is huge and will severely limit engine placement and radiator placement. In addition the frame width at the cowl will make any 20's or 30's body style you build look fat and awkward (the frame in the above pictures has already been narrowed about 18".) Having build cars both ways (mini pickup chassis and simple ladder frames) I would have to say that the mini pickup option is MUCH more challenging and difficult to make look right. Obviously, if looks are not your concern, then a stock mini-chassis can be used and some sort of body built to sit on top of it. But think long and hard before investing your time and money into a car like that. I have yet to see one used in an open wheel car that looks really good...and I've seen dozens of attempts - including my own. I don't want to discourage you from your plans, but from my limited experience, you will be much happier with the simple ladder type chassis you originally considered.
__________________
Always learning...and sharing what I've learned. The Scratch-Built Hot Rod. |
|
|||||
|
check out this site http://www.morbid-rodz.com/ I don't there bodies are the greatest, the roadster looks like a box and the Sedan looks kind of odd in the rear, the only 1 I would really consider is the truck cab... but the $1,500 for a roller frame isn't bad provided it is a sound frame.
|
|
||||||
|
Building your own frame is a little more complicated than you may think. So is modifying a frame. If you want to check out how I started when building my frame for my 34 pickup you can find it here..http://dons.zenfolio.com/p861300798/...7E88#902594184
There is a breif discription for each picture below the picture. |
|
||||||
|
Hot rod frame building
How stuck are you on the '34 body? In the last few years these cabs have become very popular and expensive. Wouuld you consider a Model A instead? Building a pickup cab from a cowl and 2 doors would be much more cost effective. I just bought the above pieces along with a frame and both front and rear ends for $250. The plan is to use 2 more doors for the quarter panels and fab a flat back panel for the cab.
The 2x4 tubing will work for the frame but to make it look 'right' you will want to taper the front of the rails about 27" back. You only need 2" at the front cross member. I would suggest you build your body first, then have the pickup box, engine, front and rear suspensions before you design your frame. Good luck with this project. It's a big one, but it will be really gradifing when it's done. Ron |
|
||||||
|
Hot rod frame building
Here's a link to a thread on tapering your rails;
http://www.tbucketeers.com/forum/f5/...ame-rails-952/ Ron |
|
|
| Recent General Rodding Tech posts with photos |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Beverly Hillbillies Hot Rod | tgotcha | Hotrodders' Lounge | 14 | 06-29-2010 06:09 PM |
| building a hot rod in the future | over drive | Introduce Yourself | 2 | 04-08-2006 06:50 PM |
| Is 2 inch stitch welding going to make my frame to hot | STATUTORY GRAPE | Suspension - Brakes - Steering | 2 | 01-21-2005 07:17 AM |
| A true Hot Rod | Nightfire | Hotrodders' Lounge | 10 | 10-18-2004 04:40 PM |
| Hot Rod of the Week suggestions? | Jon | Hotrodders' Lounge | 30 | 06-02-2003 04:53 AM |