![]() |
|
|
|
||||||
|
You might have a bit more lower rpm response due to a more accurate way of measureing incoming air. But depending on CFM's of flow on the throttlebody vs. the carb, your intake velocity should be relatively the same. And as you are not changing runner sizes or dimensions, your power range will be pretty much the same. I dont know what the difference is in dimensions of the TBI vs. the carb. You might gain or lose a little volume depending on the height, but again, this isn't going to affect your overall powerband drastically.
__________________
Bringing history and technology together. |
|
||||||
|
TBI and MAF?
Quote:
|
|
|||||
|
you should be able to "MAP" it to compensate for any weaker signal by boosting or cutting the fuel pulse at any given rpm, and the Torker (misnamed by Edelbrock- as it is a mini tunnel ram by looks and rpm range) should give you a good healthy high rpm performance
|
|
||||||
|
It isn't missnamed. The torker is a single plane intake that has more bottom end than the normal single plane intakes. They are rated 2,500 to 6,500. Other single plane intakes can be rated to start working at 4,500+.
By no means are they like a tunnel ram. The torker has a small plenum and small runners to give it more bottom end torque. |
|
|
| Recent Engine posts with photos |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|