![]() |
|
|
|
||||||
|
I had ran a FMX on my 351 for years, It just didnt hold up very well. The only thing I liked about it, was I could replace all the clutches without pulling the transmission out of the car. After I got tired of rebuilding my transmission all the time I went to a C-6. I dont know about 60hp but it does take more power to run a C-6, I had lost about .2sec on the quarter from it, if you calculate it out, its only about 25-30hp difference. But like stu said the FMX may be ok for you, I was pushing well over 500hp.
Ben |
|
|||||
|
FMX
Can handle just as many horsies as a C6 if done correctly.
Not wanting to start any arguments or suspicions of others mechanical abilities. Just my .02 cents worth. Plus 47 years as a rebuilder. |
|
||||||
|
More then welcome cougar70, good luck with it, by the way my wife has me cleaning out the garage this weekend, I think I may have some old Cleveland performance parts, if you want them you can PM me, Im into windsors now so have no use for them.
Ben Stu I know you have 47 years experiance, I have read your other bosts here,....I mean posts... Im sure no one knows more then you about transmissions. |
|
||||||
|
Re: Info
Quote:
Not wanting to start arguments or suspicions of others mathematical abilitys. FMX=25 C6=60 25-60 = 35hp wow pretty close to what I said thanks Stu Last edited by brainsboy; 08-20-2004 at 07:57 AM. |
|
|
| Recent Transmission - Rearend posts with photos |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|