Triangulated 4 link anti-squat - Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board -- Hot Rod Forum

Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Unanswered Posts Auto Escrow Insurance Auto Loans
Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board > Tech Help> Suspension - Brakes - Steering
User Name
lost password?   |   register now

LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-14-2006, 05:40 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ardmore, Oklahoma
Posts: 7
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Triangulated 4 link anti-squat

I have read several of the previous post about four link rear suspensions and have become very concerned about the designs out there, such as TCI, that show parallel links with reference to each other and to the ground that should have no anti-squat. There must be hundreds out there with this setup. I am referring to the chassis for the '32 Ford in particular. Just how important is this to a street rod chassis to have anti-squat. Without anti-squat, is the chassis going to transfer so much weight when accelerating from a dead stop that it will create tire rub on the rear fenders? Some of the builders are setting up the links where the instant center is behind the axle. How is the anti-squat figured in this setup? These should squat even worse than the parallel setups. Right? I am totally confused and need help to understand this suspension design.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-14-2006, 06:14 AM
BillyShope's Avatar
Philippines Cowboy

Last journal entry: THE TRACTION DYNO
Last photo:
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Orlando, FL
Age: 81
Posts: 884
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 13 Times in 7 Posts
First, weight transfer is determined by total weight, CG height, wheelbase, and acceleration. Nothing more. The only thing left to "adjust" is just how much of that weight transfer is carried through the links and how much through the rear suspension springs. With 100% anti-squat, it's carried entirely through the links and the springs see none of it.

Having each link pair parallel is great, in that there is no binding during cornering, but, as you pointed out, you get excessive squat if the pair is also parallel to the ground. If, however, the links are parallel to the no squat/no rise line (100% anti-squat), you still avoid the binding and, at the same time, have no squat or rise. This requires an angle with a tangent equal to the CG height divided by the wheelbase.

I would say that 100% anti-squat is particularly important for a competition car, in that a rear end bobbing up and down means rear tire loads are also varying with time. For a street car, parallel links that are also parallel to the no squat/no rise line will result in some loss in ride quality. Placing the IC on the line at a height equal to the tire radius will restore ride quality, but, unless it's a triangulated 4link OR a 3link, binding is a problem.

The no squat/no rise line passes through the rear tire patch, with the effects reversed as the IC is positioned behind the rear axle.

I discuss these matters more fully at:
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-14-2006, 01:15 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ardmore, Oklahoma
Posts: 7
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks for the reply. Sounds like the street rod chassis builder is looking for a combination of IC / roll center and spring rate to get the good ride characteristics. The triangulated four link seems to be the nicer looking package, but is susceptable to binding. The suspension travel on the street rod is very limited though. Lots of trade offs here. Thanks again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Recent Suspension - Brakes - Steering posts with photos

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name (usually not your first and last name), your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:
Please select your insurance company (Optional)


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Triangulated four link rear suspension Ridiek Suspension - Brakes - Steering 23 01-05-2006 06:15 AM
Triangulated four link 41willys Suspension - Brakes - Steering 18 10-26-2005 03:51 PM
Triangulated 4 link help?! jqmile Suspension - Brakes - Steering 14 10-19-2004 09:35 AM
4 link vs. triangulated 4 link. rear suspension bentwings Suspension - Brakes - Steering 4 11-23-2002 12:44 PM
Parallel 4 link or Triangulated 4 link rear ? RonWood Suspension - Brakes - Steering 1 11-13-2002 07:25 AM

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:56 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999 - 2012. All Rights Reserved.