![]() |
|
|
|
||||
|
Tune port injection vs. throttle body injection
I am building a 39 chevy sedan. I am planning on using a new 350 like came in the 94 chevrolet pickups. The 94 pickup i have gets about 18 mpg with throttle body injection. Tune port injection looks good on a street rod, but is there any advantage to it. I can get a throttle body injection system complete at a pretty cheap price, but The TPI seems to be about $300 to $400 and most of them require me to get the 90-92 computer for speed density sensor. I know that most of TPI injections i have ran across are from 305's and will need the injectors upgraded to the 350 ones. That will run over a couple hundred dollars. So is it really worth the extra money to go tune port over throttle body? I am building a driver car, not a drag car and on a limited budget. Saving money to build a new house. I am running a 700R4 from a 89 Camaro and a 3.40 gear in an 8" rear-end. Thanks for any info, Steven
|
|
||||
|
you can't for the time being beat a modern carb set up for power but if you have the time and money port injection is a nice set up, TBI is good but the injectors have limited flow so if you build a hot engine it may be more problems than it is worth. Now for off road injection (TBI or port) is the only real option.
henry @ oles |
|
||||||
|
All depends on what you want to do with the engine.
The TBI is good for factory engines and has a good cold start and idle at any temp. The TPI looks better performs better and I thing has a better idle quality. If you compare induction to induction I think the TPI wins hands down. Better performance, better fuel economy, and better looking. I have a complete TPI set up with the upgraded runners, just waiting to be installed on a engine, problem is I have had this set up for at least 2 years, but since upgraded to a LT1 engine. So the TPI just sits on the shelf. I think for the money the TPI is worth it. Just my .02 Steve |
|
||||
|
Henry is right, it's hard to beat a very well setup carb and intake system for the street. My choice for performance is ALWAYS a well setup Holley HP.
BUT, a poor carb setup to EFI is like apples and footballs. The last retro we did was a 400 SBC from an Edelbrock carb and intake to a TPI controlled by a F.A.S.T. EFI system. The customer was EXTREMELY pleased with how it ran. The trouble though with the stock TPI is it's not going to make horsepower. This application was in a truck with aftermarket runners. Still not a HP king at all but it made 450 ft/lbs of torque under 3000 RPM on the dyno. That's SAE corrected as well. Not foo foo magazine numbers. |
|
|
| Recent Engine posts with photos |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| lobe cam in a tune port injection | rhibbsiii | Engine | 7 | 03-28-2006 01:14 PM |
| I'm going to make a bonfire out of my car | blown69stang | Engine | 36 | 08-22-2005 03:36 PM |
| bad throttle body? | Skylark_77_455 | Engine | 2 | 12-23-2002 06:10 AM |
| chevy 400 cid vortec tune port | brnrubr | Engine | 1 | 11-20-2002 07:33 PM |
| sticky throttle on 1987 Corvette, Tuned Port Injection | H-D_Vette | Engine | 1 | 11-13-2002 12:53 PM |