Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board - View Single Post - Undestanding Ackerman/suspension geometry
View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 12-31-2012, 12:09 PM
MARTINSR's Avatar
MARTINSR MARTINSR is offline
Brian Martin,Freelance adviser
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: San francisco bay area
Age: 56
Posts: 13,435
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 1,570
Thanked 1,324 Times in 1,149 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by timothale View Post
Moving the rack fore aft will change more angles, arc swing and change the effective akerman angles inducing more toe- in or toe- out during turns than ideal akerman angles. Racing geometry gets more complicated hard cornering suspension squat changes effective camber and that affects where the tire wants to roll. My old friend Bruce Cambern, retired head of Ford SVO designed the last suspension on his 427 Cobra on his home computer, And his theories worked.
I never thought about it that way but yeah in reading the little bit on the ackermann principle in racing with suspension rebound and what not they control the toe and that is all I use see it as, but if one toe is more or less than the other THAT is part of the ackermann principle so where I use to think of it as simple "bumpsteer" the experienced engineer is USING this "flaw" to do what he wants, very interesting.

Brian
Reply With Quote