Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board - View Single Post - very lazy 400
Thread: very lazy 400
View Single Post
  #64 (permalink)  
Old 02-26-2013, 04:17 AM
cobalt327's Avatar
cobalt327 cobalt327 is offline
WFO
 
Last wiki edit: Intake manifold
Last journal entry: 1980 Malibu Wagon
Last photo:
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Atlanta
Age: 59
Posts: 5,037
Wiki Edits: 1616

Thanks: 128
Thanked 597 Times in 546 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by 90caprice408 View Post
I will more than likely try both methods to see how it responds to each...will try the light springs first(maybe 1 light 1 medium) bein that I bought a recurve kit a while back but never used it.....and if that doesn't work I will go with the locked out method...
Just use the light springs for testing- the idea is to see if the engine actually wants to run w/a ton of advance or if it will detonate under heavy throttle/heavy load below 3000 rpm or so- which is the normal "all in by" rpm. Using the light springs, once you see if the engine detonates under load or not you can decide whether to use some mechanical advance or not.

To run a big cam/locked advance you really need a loose torque converter- is yours actually stalling at 3000 rpm or more? Steeper rear gears will help w/this as well. With a too tight TC and/or highway gears, detonation is more likely w/locked timing. Whether the 3.73s and the TC you have is enough or not remains to be seen.

Ideally for a car as heavy as yours is you'd put a smaller cam in the engine along w/using the correct compression to match the cam, but if you're bound to keep the cam, you should go w/more gear and stall. Gutting 600 lbs. would help, too. I've seen estimates of 4000-4200 lbs for a 1990 Caprice.
Reply With Quote