![]() |
|
|
|
|||||
|
Which vortec head is best?
Aluminum vortec head 200cc runners/64cc, 2.02/1.60
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/PAIR-...QQcmdZViewItem or RHS, ProTorker Vortec Cast Iron Head, 170cc/64cc, Assembled 170cc/64cc, 2.02/1.60, Assembled, Pair Both are the same price. Going in a 1977 corvette (3400lbs) , auto(TH350), edelbrock performer intake, 2.5"ram horn exhaust manifolds with true dual exhaust (no cats), Q-jet, planning on mild/mod cam, rpms kept under 5500. Which head is best for my application and why? Thanks, Scott |
|
||||||
|
How about other specs; compression, target use of the car, rear axle ratio, cam specs... Its pointless to recommend something unless we know everything about the car.
If you're really keeping it under 5500, then there is absolutely no reason for big-port heads. They'll kill low end and drivability. You can do a lot with stock iron vortecs. They exhibit tons of flow with small ports, meaning they will shine in both HP and low end drivability. They'll do really well in a 350 up to 5500 rpms without porting. With some porting and bigger valves, I've seen them lay down 600 hp in a 400. Add in the fact that they can be had for $350 a set rebuilt and I'd say they're a winner. |
|
|
| Recent Engine posts with photos |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AFR or Vortec heads? Cam? | rodent | Engine | 18 | 06-08-2010 03:50 PM |
| Vortec head studs??? | rbomar | Engine | 3 | 11-12-2006 08:22 AM |
| Warning Vortec Head users | ChevyIIMan | Engine | 3 | 06-16-2004 09:06 AM |
| Vortec Head Bolts | reddwarf | Engine | 2 | 02-24-2003 10:56 AM |
| Vortec head ? | 83GrandPrix | Engine | 5 | 02-01-2003 08:33 PM |