![]() |
Hotrodders Bulletin Board
Home · Bulletin Board · Project Journals · Tech Article Wiki · Knowledge Base · Photo Gallery · Classifieds · Company Reviews · Calendar · T-Shirts |
|
||||||
|
|||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
#16
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
arns,
tripped over another example on the corral.net site (duh!....arns85GT= arns302 ford....wonder if any of my brain cells are alive) stock 5.0 block 220/220 cam (crane) GT40p heads BBK headers normal/typical 5.0 add ons for peak hp/tq graph is rwhp..... note that there just isn't much hp/tq present till 3,000+ to get more low end "punch".....you listed your power band (cam) very similar my point is, if your custom made pipes (way cool!) don't add a bunch at low rpms....it's not likely anything you did or didn't do Last edited by red65mustang : 02-08-2007 at 09:14 AM. |
|
#17
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Haha
V6 here. (sorry, no Mustang) Yeah, I'm playing with a 140 hp stock engine. I currently have 131 whp on the last dyno run, without headers. The car ran its best time (stock) at 15.474 on the 1/4 mi. I'm hoping to do a little better. You can see the log exhaust manifolds. They have an unequal length Xover pipe. Really bad design. I'm hoping to get the car down to an honest 15 flat time with a Holley 390, some head work, and headers. I know the car is capable of 12's with an SBC but I'm content to play with the 6 for now. This is my "little rod". Thanks for the help. Arn |
|
#18
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
arns,
I looked up the stock spec's, what jumped out at me is the stock rear gears are only 3.65 with a OD tranny (70mph=1800???, 28mpg) if they are available, 4:11 gears will do what you want big time..... that's what made all the old sports cars (MG's, Triumph, etc) fun....100bhp and deeeeep gears and small diameter tires......a blast around town.....6krpms was about 100mph "top speed" definitely will help your ET (140HP/2700lbs) drive safe Red |
|
#19
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Odd thing
Thanks,
This is the odd thing. It is pretty well documented that the fastest Fiero on the 1/4 mi. is the 1985 4 speed with the 3.65 gears. One would think the lower gear ratio would do better, but that just isn't the case. It has to do with the first 3 gears' configuration. Also the 4.11 came in the '84 tranny which has a much weaker case. Some guys have put the 4.11 gears in the '85 case and it works pretty well with v8 conversions, however, the 1/4 mi figures still work out that the 3.65 - 4 gear is the quickest. Go fig eh? My GT ,BTW, is the second fastest stock 2.8 documented on the Fiero Forum. That's the trivia of the day. The fastest was also a 3.65. Arn Edit - the stock weight with all fluids on my notchback is 2552 lbs. The fastbacks are heavier. |
![]() |
Back to top |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads for: "What are the typical performance gains for equal length headers over OE"
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Full length headers on hot rod? | staleg | Engine | 3 | 12-29-2006 05:51 PM |
| full length headers for 56 chev truck | 56 3100 | Engine | 5 | 03-03-2005 05:41 AM |
| exhaust system length affect performance? | smlblcks10 | Engine | 10 | 02-19-2004 04:40 PM |