![]() |
|
|
|
|||||
|
Will my CR be too high?
Thinking of putting 461 heads on my SBC but don't want to go over 9.5 because of detonation with the hyper pistons. Engine specs are:
355 (4.030" bore) SBC Stock crank (3.48" stroke) Regular Fel-pro head gasket (thickness?) block at stock deck height H345NP+30 Fed Mog pistons 461 double hump heads I read that the 461 heads have 60.5cc chambers?!? I currently have 336x heads on it which should have 72cc chambers from what I read. The specs (from here) on the pistons say they should have a cr of 9.35 with 64cc heads. Using this I calculated that the cr with 60.5cc heads should be 9.58. Can someone check to make sure I did this correctly? I don't want the car to detonate if it gets hot since I only run pump gas. Will i still be ok with 92 octane with this cr? |
|
||||||
|
With the piston 0.025" in the hole, a 0.041" head gasket, 4.1" gasket diameter, 5cc dish, and 64 cc chambers you will be at 9.75:1 CR.
60 cc chambers, all else the same is 10.2:1. Zero deck, 64 cc= 10.34, zero and 60 cc= 10.85. You need to find a calculator you like and get used to using it.
|
|
|||||
|
Quote:
The problem is that i do have a calculator I like and it gives me similar numbers to what you're getting. I'm wondering why the piston spec page I quoted says 9.35 for 64cc heads with these pistons?? |
|
|||||
|
Isn't the H345NP piston a 1.540" compression height piston, instead of factory spec 1.560"?? This fact would make their published #'s close to correct.
Just asking, I don't ever use hypers. I just looked and yes it is, means that piston is down the bore .045" on an uncut block. Lowers compression ratio and KILLS quench with an .041" gasket. Will be detonation prone and want better than 90 octane at 9.35-1 because of it. I'd find a better piston or zero deck the block to reduce octane sensitivity. Last edited by ericnova72; 06-24-2010 at 04:44 PM. |
|
|||||
|
Wow, I didn't know they have a different compression height than stock... that sux. I wish I knew that before I put them in. Would some thinner head gaskets help?
The engine runs good and doesn't detonate as far as I know. I guess I better stick with the 336x heads. The engine has very run little time on it so if I did end up changing pistons in this engine, should I reuse the bearings, rods, and rings? I don't have much of a budget to rebuild this engine again... The other thing is that the engine was balanced for these pistons and rods. What pistons can I use that are roughly the same weight so I don't have to rebalance the engine? Last edited by enduro54; 06-24-2010 at 06:43 PM. |
|
|||||
|
The compression height info is on the Flatlander page you linked, all you had to do is look, same as the TRW catalog.
Thinner head gaskets would help but it could have sealing problems if the block deck isn't flat(and they rarely are after 70.000 miles) and the head remachined flat. The 461 heads do have a better, less detonation prone chamber than the 336, have them skimm cut to make sure they are flat and use the #1094 Felpro rubber coated shim gasket. On an apples to apples comparison of unported heads, the 461 head(and any fuelie chamber/camel hump head) will make roughly 15-20 hp/20-25 ft lbs Tq more than a smog chamber head like the 336x, just from the better chamber shape. Gets better yet if they are ported. I don't have a clue what other piston might weigh the same, you'll have to do your own homework there. |
|
|||||
|
I'm surprised to hear the fuelies have a better combustion chamber shape than the 336x's. I'd probably stand the chance of detonating with the 461's because of the higher cr, right? I definitely don't want that with hyper pistons. I think I'll just stick with the 336x's for now.
|
|
|||||
|
The basic fuelie combustion chamber shape is quite close to the same as all modern aluminum and iron aftermarket SBC heads. There are slight differences and refinements with the newer heads but it is the same basic shape.
|
|
|||||
|
Knowing the lack of quench in my engine will raise my detonation risk, I don;t feel comfortable putting the fuellies on and raising my cr. I think I'll just leave it alone or this season. If I end up tearing it down this winter, can I use the same rings, bearings, etc and just change the pistons? The engine has very little run time on it. I think changing the pistons would be better than having it decked since I'd have to take it apart to deck it anyway.
|
|
||||||
|
Quote:
In any event, between the chambers and the ports, there's no doubt that the Vortec head outperforms the fulie head. Just as the fulie heads outperform the later large chamber SBC head. Old: Vortec: |
|
||||||
|
Quote:
I missed that part. Can you point me to where you listed the rules? I don't recall what vehicle this is, or the set-up either so if that is already here somewhere I'd appreciate a link to that, too. |
|
|
| Recent Engine posts with photos |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| High Volume vs High Pressure | Moore's Speed | Engine | 8 | 07-29-2006 08:30 PM |
| How high can I rev? | Malibu73 | Engine | 9 | 02-03-2006 07:45 AM |
| High Powered Coil's Question | Francis | Electrical | 3 | 04-12-2004 03:36 AM |
| Emissions HELP | cutsupreme | Engine | 33 | 12-27-2003 08:22 AM |
| More Info, High RPM to Shift on 700R4 | Ted Bundy | Transmission - Rearend | 3 | 11-25-2003 05:44 PM |